Employee Non-Compete Agreement and Enforceability Memo — Utah
UTAH Employee Non-Compete Agreement and Enforceability Memo
Quick-Reference Summary
| Item | Utah Specifics |
|---|---|
| Governing statute | Utah Code §§ 34-51-102, 34-51-201 through 34-51-206, and 34-51-301 (Post-Employment Restrictions Act) |
| Effective dates | General employee one-year rule: May 10, 2016; healthcare-worker and veterinarian amendments: May 6, 2026 |
| General employee maximum duration | One (1) year post-termination |
| Effect of exceeding one year | Void — likely not subject to judicial reformation |
| Common-law reasonableness | Still required: (1) supported by consideration; (2) no bad faith; (3) necessary to protect goodwill; (4) reasonable in time and geography (Kasco Servs. Corp. v. Benson, 831 P.2d 86 (Utah 1992)) |
| Broadcasting carve-out | § 34-51-201(2) — non-compete valid only if (a) employee is exempt broadcasting employee; (b) part of written contract of reasonable duration; (c) employer terminates for cause OR employee breaches; (d) duration no longer than earlier of 1 year or original contract term |
| Severance-agreement exception | § 34-51-202(1)(a) — reasonable severance agreement mutually and freely agreed upon in good faith at or after termination |
| Sale-of-business exception | § 34-51-202(1)(b) — general or healthcare non-compete tied to sale of business where the restricted individual receives value related to the sale |
| NDA / non-solicit / confidentiality | Outside the general non-compete definition, but healthcare-worker patient notices and veterinarian nonsolicit/nondisclosure terms are separately regulated by §§ 34-51-203, 34-51-205, and 34-51-206 |
| Healthcare worker | A person may not enter a healthcare-practice non-compete on or after May 6, 2026 unless a § 34-51-202 severance or sale-of-business exception applies |
| Veterinarian | Non-compete prohibited unless veterinarian owns at least 5%; out-of-state dispute forum void; nonsolicitation agreement void; experience-related nondisclosure clause void |
| Employer enforcement remedy | § 34-51-301 — employer liable for employee's arbitration costs, attorney fees and court costs, and actual damages after seeking enforcement of a covered agreement determined unenforceable |
| Blue-pencil / reformation | Chapter 51 supplies no right to reformation; § 34-51-201 declares a violating agreement void |
| Trade-secret backstop | Utah UTSA, Utah Code §§ 13-24-1 to 13-24-9 |
| Choice of law / forum | Permissible; Utah public policy applies to Utah-resident employees |
Part A — Enforceability Memo
TO: [CLIENT / HIRING MANAGER]
FROM: [COUNSEL NAME], [LAW FIRM]
RE: Enforceability of Proposed Non-Compete Agreement with [EMPLOYEE NAME] — Utah Law (Post-Employment Restrictions Act)
DATE: [__/__/____]
1. Executive Summary
For a general employer-employee agreement entered on or after May 10, 2016, Utah Code § 34-51-201 caps post-employment non-compete duration at one year and renders a violating agreement void. Agreements entered on or after May 6, 2026 require an occupation screen: licensed healthcare-practice non-competes are prohibited unless a § 34-51-202 exception applies, while veterinarian agreements are subject to the ownership, forum, nonsolicitation, and nondisclosure rules in §§ 34-51-201, 34-51-205, and 34-51-206. Beyond the statutory rules, the proposed agreement must satisfy current Utah common law as confirmed by Utah counsel.
Critical risk: Under Utah Code § 34-51-301, an employer that seeks to enforce a covered agreement determined unenforceable is liable for the employee's arbitration costs, attorney fees and court costs, and actual damages.
2. Statutory and Common-Law Requirements
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Statutory cap (§ 34-51-201(1)) | Duration ≤ 1 year post-termination |
| Consideration (Kasco) | Initial employment OR separately bargained-for benefit |
| No bad faith (Kasco) | Fair process; no overreach at termination |
| Protect goodwill (Kasco) | Legitimate interest: customer relationships, trade secrets, specialized training |
| Reasonable time (Kasco) | Within 1-year statutory cap; consider 6 months for typical roles |
| Reasonable geography (Kasco) | Tied to areas where employer does business and employee worked |
| Written agreement | Strongly recommended |
3. Excluded / Differently Regulated Agreements
| Agreement Type | Governing Law |
|---|---|
| Non-disclosure / confidentiality | Outside the general one-year definition, but veterinarian experience-related nondisclosure clauses are regulated by § 34-51-205 |
| Customer non-solicitation | Outside the general one-year definition; healthcare-worker patient notices and veterinarian nonsolicitation remain subject to §§ 34-51-203 and 34-51-206 |
| Employee non-solicitation (no-raid) | Outside the general one-year definition; veterinarian nonsolicitation agreements entered on or after May 6, 2026 are void |
| Sale-of-business non-compete | § 34-51-202(1)(b) — exception for general or healthcare non-compete if the restricted individual receives value related to the sale |
| Severance-agreement non-compete | § 34-51-202(1)(a) — exception if reasonable, mutually and freely agreed in good faith at or after termination |
| Broadcasting-industry non-compete | § 34-51-201(2) — special multi-element test |
4. Broadcasting Carve-Out (§ 34-51-201(2))
A non-compete between a broadcasting company and a broadcasting employee is valid only if:
- The employee is an exempt broadcasting employee;
- The non-compete is part of a written employment contract of reasonable duration (based on industry standards, position, experience, geography, and unique circumstances);
- Either the broadcasting company terminates the employee for cause, or the employee breaches the contract such that the employee is no longer employed; and
- Duration is no longer than the earlier of (i) one year post-termination, or (ii) the day the original contract term ends.
A non-compete failing any of these is void.
5. Fee-Shifting Penalty (§ 34-51-301)
If an employer seeks to enforce a non-compete and the agreement is found unenforceable in court or arbitration, the employer is liable for the employee's:
- Arbitration costs
- Court costs
- Attorney fees
This is one-way fee-shifting against the employer. There is no corresponding fee award if the employer prevails. Draft conservatively to avoid triggering this remedy.
6. Recommended Drafting Parameters (UT)
| Restriction | Recommended Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Duration | 6 months for most roles; 1 year only with strong justification | Statutory cap |
| Geographic scope | Counties / radius where Employee actually worked or Company operates | Kasco factor |
| Scope of activities | Tied to Employee's actual role | Avoid "any capacity" |
| Customer non-solicit | 1–2 years; limited to customers Employee personally serviced or learned of | Outside cap, but draft narrowly |
| Employee non-solicit | 1–2 years | Outside cap |
| Confidentiality | Perpetual for trade secrets; 3–5 years for confidential info | Utah UTSA anchor |
7. Recommendation
[The proposed NCA with [EMPLOYEE NAME] is / is not enforceable as drafted under Utah law. Recommended modifications: ________________________________.]
Part B — General Employee Non-Compete Agreement (Utah — Not for Healthcare Workers or Veterinarians)
EMPLOYEE NON-COMPETITION, NON-SOLICITATION, AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
This Agreement is entered into between [EMPLOYER NAME] ("Company") and [EMPLOYEE NAME] ("Employee") on [__/__/____] (the "Effective Date"), which is on or after May 10, 2016, the effective date of the Utah Post-Employment Restrictions Act.
Recitals
A. Company is engaged in the business of [________________________________] (the "Business").
B. Employee [is being offered initial employment with / is being promoted within / is receiving the following additional consideration from] Company: [________________________________].
C. Employee will have access to Company's trade secrets, confidential business information, customer relationships, and specialized training, the protection of which constitutes a legitimate business interest within the meaning of Kasco Servs. Corp. v. Benson, 831 P.2d 86 (Utah 1992).
D. Employee is not performing licensed healthcare practice within § 34-51-102's healthcare-worker definition and is not a veterinarian. If either statement is incorrect, do not use this form without occupation-specific Utah counsel review.
1. Definitions
1.1 "Competing Business" means [________________________________].
1.2 "Restricted Territory" means [the following Utah counties / a [____]-mile radius from each Company office at which Employee worked during the 12 months prior to termination]: [________________________________].
1.3 "Restricted Period" means one (1) year [or, if shorter, [________ months]] following termination of Employee's employment for any reason. Notwithstanding any other provision, in no event shall the Restricted Period exceed one (1) year, consistent with Utah Code § 34-51-201(1).
1.4 "Customer" means any person or entity to whom Company sold products or provided services during the 24 months preceding Employee's termination and whom Employee personally serviced or about whom Employee received Confidential Information.
1.5 "Confidential Information" includes trade secrets as defined in Utah Code § 13-24-2.
2. Non-Competition
During the Restricted Period, within the Restricted Territory, Employee shall not, directly or indirectly, engage in any Competing Business in a capacity substantially similar to the capacity in which Employee served Company. In no event shall this restriction extend beyond one (1) year from the date Employee is no longer employed by Company (Utah Code § 34-51-201(1)).
3. Customer Non-Solicitation (Occupation Screen Required)
During the [twelve (12) to twenty-four (24)] months following termination, Employee shall not solicit or accept business from any Customer with respect to products or services competitive with the Business. This provision is outside the general one-year non-compete definition, but it may not override § 34-51-203's healthcare-worker patient-notice protection or § 34-51-206's veterinarian nonsolicitation prohibition.
4. Employee Non-Solicitation (Occupation Screen Required)
For [twelve (12) to twenty-four (24)] months after termination, Employee shall not solicit, recruit, or hire any person who was an employee or independent contractor of Company during the 6 months preceding Employee's termination.
5. Confidentiality and Trade Secrets
Employee shall hold all Confidential Information in strict confidence. Trade-secret obligations are perpetual; other Confidential Information obligations continue [____] years post-termination. Misappropriation is independently actionable under the Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah Code §§ 13-24-1 to 13-24-9.
6. Return of Property
Upon termination, Employee shall return all Company property and certify deletion of Company information from personal devices.
7. Reasonableness; Severability
The parties acknowledge that the restrictions are reasonable under Kasco Servs. Corp. v. Benson, supported by good and valuable consideration, entered into in good faith, and necessary to protect Company's legitimate goodwill. If any provision is held unenforceable, the parties intend that the remaining provisions remain in effect.
8. Remedies
Breach causes irreparable harm. Company may seek injunctive relief and damages. The parties acknowledge Utah Code § 34-51-301, under which an employer that seeks to enforce an unenforceable non-compete is liable for the employee's arbitration costs, court costs, and attorney fees.
9. Governing Law; Venue
Utah law governs. Venue is the state and federal courts in [________________________________] County, Utah. Any choice-of-law provision selecting another state is void to the extent it would deprive Employee of the protections of the Utah Post-Employment Restrictions Act.
10. Severability; Survival; Entire Agreement
Severable. Sections 1–8 survive termination. This is the entire agreement on its subject matter.
11. Employee Acknowledgments
Employee acknowledges: (a) opportunity to consult independent counsel; (b) consideration in Recital B is good and sufficient; (c) protectable interests are real and substantial; (d) Employee enters this Agreement freely.
EMPLOYEE:
| Signature | Date |
|---|---|
| [EMPLOYEE NAME] | [__/__/____] |
COMPANY:
| Signature | Date |
|---|---|
| [EMPLOYER NAME] | [__/__/____] |
| By: [________________________________] | |
| Title: [________________________________] |
Part C — Pre-Signing Checklist
☐ One-year cap observed in Section 2 — Restricted Period does not exceed 12 months.
☐ Kasco common-law factors documented in legal file: consideration, no bad faith, necessary to protect goodwill, reasonable time and geography.
☐ Consideration identified in Recital B — initial employment or specific additional benefit.
☐ Restricted Territory geographically reasonable and tied to Company's actual business area / Employee's actual work location.
☐ Scope of activities tied to Employee's actual role (no "any capacity").
☐ Employee is not a statutory healthcare worker or veterinarian. If false, stop and use occupation-specific counsel.
☐ Customer non-solicit screened under §§ 34-51-203 and 34-51-206 — Section 3.
☐ Employee non-solicit screened under § 34-51-206 — Section 4.
☐ Confidentiality anchored to Utah UTSA (Utah Code §§ 13-24-1 et seq.).
☐ Broadcasting carve-out addressed if Company is a broadcaster — confirm all § 34-51-201(2) elements.
☐ Severance-agreement non-compete (if used at termination) drafted under § 34-51-202(1)(a).
☐ Sale-of-business non-compete (if applicable) drafted under § 34-51-202(1)(b).
☐ Fee-shifting (§ 34-51-301) risk evaluated before any enforcement action.
☐ Governing law / venue set to Utah.
☐ Reasonable opportunity to review — provide draft at least [____] business days before execution.
☐ Onboarding file retains: signed offer letter, signed Agreement, consideration documentation.
☐ Existing-employer NCA conflict check for laterals.
Sources and References
- Utah Code Title 34, Chapter 51 (Post-Employment Restrictions Act): https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-201: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S201.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-202: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S202.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-203: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S203.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-205: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S205.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-206: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S206.html
- Utah Code § 34-51-301: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title34/Chapter51/34-51-S301.html
- Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah Code §§ 13-24-1 to 13-24-9: https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title13/Chapter24/13-24.html
- Kasco Servs. Corp. v. Benson, 831 P.2d 86 (Utah 1992)
- FindLaw — Utah Code § 34-51-201: https://codes.findlaw.com/ut/title-34-labor-in-general/ut-code-sect-34-51-201/
- Utah State Bar: https://www.utahbar.org/
About this template
- Last updated
- July 28, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Utah
- Category
- Employment & HR
Legal authority
- Utah Code § 34-51-201 (Post-Employment Restrictions Act; one-year maximum for agreements entered on or after May 10, 2016)
- Utah Code § 34-51-201(2) (broadcasting company / broadcasting employee provisions)
- Utah Code § 34-51-202(1)(a)-(b) (severance-agreement and sale-of-business exceptions)
- Utah Code §§ 34-51-203, 34-51-205, and 34-51-206 (healthcare-worker and veterinarian restrictions)
- Utah Code § 34-51-301 (employee remedy — arbitration costs, court costs, attorney fees)
- Kasco Servs. Corp. v. Benson, 831 P.2d 86 (Utah 1992) (common-law reasonableness factors)
- Utah Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Utah Code §§ 13-24-1 to 13-24-9
Employment documents govern the relationship between a company and its workers, from offer letters and employment agreements through handbooks, performance reviews, and separations. Done right, they set clear expectations, protect against wrongful termination and discrimination claims, and give both sides a record to rely on. Done poorly, they invite lawsuits, agency complaints, and costly disputes.
Not legal advice
This template is provided for informational purposes. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Checked against the law it cites
The statutes this template relies on are listed under Legal authority.
Draft your Employee Non-Compete Agreement and Enforceability Memo — Utah in the editor
Answer a few questions, let the AI editor draft each section from your answers, review it, and download Word and PDF. $99 one time, or $249 per month for every document and every Ezel app.