DEFAMATION COMPLAINT — PER SE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Per Se Category
- Cause of Action — Defamation Per Se
- Damages
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- Signature Block
I. CAPTION
IN THE [________________________________] COURT OF [________________________________]
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
Case No.: [________________________________]
[________________________________], Plaintiff,
v.
[________________________________], Defendant(s).
II. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [________________________________] ("Plaintiff") is:
- ☐ An individual residing at [________________________________], State of [________________________________]
- ☐ A business entity organized under the laws of [________________________________] -
Defendant [________________________________] ("Defendant") is:
- ☐ An individual residing at [________________________________], State of [________________________________]
- ☐ A corporation organized under the laws of [________________________________]
- ☐ A media organization with principal offices at [________________________________]
- ☐ Other: [________________________________]
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to [________________________________].
-
The amount in controversy exceeds $[________________________________], exclusive of interest and costs.
-
Venue is proper because:
- ☐ The defamatory statement was published in this county
- ☐ Defendant resides or maintains a principal place of business in this county
- ☐ Plaintiff suffered reputational injury in this county
IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
- On or about [__/__/____], Defendant made the following statement(s) to third parties:
"[________________________________]"
-
The statement was communicated via:
- ☐ Written publication (libel)
- ☐ Oral utterance (slander)
- ☐ Online post / social media
- ☐ Broadcast media (television / radio / podcast)
- ☐ Other: [________________________________] -
The statement was published to the following third-party audience: [________________________________].
-
The statement is false. The true facts are: [________________________________].
-
Plaintiff's status for First Amendment purposes:
- ☐ Private individual — negligence standard applies (Gertz, 418 U.S. 323)
- ☐ Limited-purpose public figure — actual malice standard applies
- ☐ Public official — actual malice standard applies (Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254)
V. PER SE CATEGORY
- The defamatory statement falls within the following recognized per se category:
- ☐ Imputation of a serious criminal offense — The statement accuses Plaintiff of committing [________________________________], a felony / crime of moral turpitude. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 571.
- ☐ Imputation of a loathsome disease — The statement falsely attributes to Plaintiff a condition of [________________________________]. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 572.
- ☐ Imputation injurious to business, trade, or profession — The statement impugns Plaintiff's fitness in the occupation of [________________________________]. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 573.
- ☐ Imputation of sexual misconduct or unchastity — The statement alleges that Plaintiff [________________________________]. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 574.
- Because the statement is defamatory per se, general and presumed damages are available without proof of special damages.
VI. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION — DEFAMATION PER SE
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant's statement was a false assertion of fact (not opinion) concerning Plaintiff.
-
The statement was unprivileged and was published to one or more third parties.
-
The statement is defamatory per se because it falls within the category identified in Paragraph 11.
-
Defendant acted with the requisite degree of fault:
- ☐ Negligence (private-figure plaintiff)
- ☐ Actual malice (public-figure / public-official plaintiff) -
As a direct and proximate result, Plaintiff suffered presumed damages to reputation, standing, and emotional well-being.
VII. DAMAGES
- Plaintiff seeks the following damages:
- ☐ Presumed / general damages in an amount to be determined at trial
- ☐ Special damages for documented economic losses of $[________________________________], including: [________________________________]
- ☐ Punitive / exemplary damages based on Defendant's malice, oppression, or fraud
- ☐ Emotional distress damages
- ☐ Injunctive relief — Order requiring Defendant to retract or remove the statement
- ☐ Attorneys' fees and costs where permitted by statute
VIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant;
B. Award presumed and general damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
C. Award special damages in the amount of $[________________________________];
D. Award punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and deter;
E. Issue a permanent injunction requiring Defendant to retract and remove the defamatory statement;
F. Award Plaintiff attorneys' fees and costs of suit; and
G. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
IX. VERIFICATION
I, [________________________________], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of [________________________________] that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [__/__/____] at [________________________________].
_________________________________________
Plaintiff Signature
X. SIGNATURE BLOCK
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________________
[________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
State Bar No. [________________________________]
[________________________________] (Firm Name)
[________________________________] (Address)
[________________________________] (City, State, ZIP)
[________________________________] (Telephone)
[________________________________] (Email)
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES
| State | Key Variation |
|---|---|
| California | Cal. Civ. Code § 45 (libel per se); § 46 (slander per se). Anti-SLAPP motion under CCP § 425.16 is likely. |
| New York | Must plead defamatory words with particularity (CPLR § 3016(a)). Four per se categories recognized. |
| Texas | Single-publication rule codified at Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.002. TCPA anti-SLAPP exposure (Ch. 27). |
| Florida | Pre-suit retraction demand required under Fla. Stat. § 770.01 for media defendants. |
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 558–574 (1977)
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
- CACI Nos. 1700–1704 (California Civil Jury Instructions — Defamation Per Se)
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749 (1985)
Need help customizing this document?
Get 3 days of intelligent editing. Tailor every section to your specific case.