DEFAMATION COMPLAINT — PER QUOD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Caption
- Parties
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Factual Allegations
- Inducement and Innuendo
- Cause of Action — Defamation Per Quod
- Special Damages
- Prayer for Relief
- Verification
- Signature Block
I. CAPTION
IN THE [________________________________] COURT OF [________________________________]
COUNTY OF [________________________________]
Case No.: [________________________________]
[________________________________], Plaintiff,
v.
[________________________________], Defendant(s).
II. PARTIES
-
Plaintiff [________________________________] ("Plaintiff") is:
- ☐ An individual residing at [________________________________], State of [________________________________]
- ☐ A business entity organized under the laws of [________________________________] -
Defendant [________________________________] ("Defendant") is:
- ☐ An individual residing at [________________________________], State of [________________________________]
- ☐ A corporation or media organization at [________________________________]
- ☐ Other: [________________________________]
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
-
This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to [________________________________].
-
The amount in controversy exceeds $[________________________________], exclusive of interest and costs.
-
Venue is proper because:
- ☐ The defamatory statement was published in this county
- ☐ Defendant resides or does business in this county
- ☐ Plaintiff suffered reputational and economic injury in this county
IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
- On or about [__/__/____], Defendant made the following statement(s):
"[________________________________]"
-
The statement was communicated via:
- ☐ Written publication (libel)
- ☐ Oral utterance (slander)
- ☐ Online post / social media
- ☐ Broadcast media
- ☐ Other: [________________________________] -
The statement was published to the following third-party audience(s): [________________________________].
-
On its face, the statement does not appear defamatory. However, when read in light of the extrinsic facts set forth below, the statement carries a defamatory meaning.
V. INDUCEMENT AND INNUENDO
A. Inducement (Extrinsic Facts)
- The following extrinsic facts, known to the recipients of the statement, give the statement its defamatory meaning:
a. [________________________________]
b. [________________________________]
c. [________________________________]
B. Innuendo (Defamatory Meaning)
-
In light of the above extrinsic facts, the statement was understood by its recipients to mean: [________________________________].
-
This meaning is defamatory because it tends to:
- ☐ Expose Plaintiff to hatred, contempt, or ridicule
- ☐ Injure Plaintiff in their trade, business, or profession
- ☐ Cause Plaintiff to be shunned or avoided
- ☐ Lower Plaintiff's estimation in the community
C. Colloquium (Statement Refers to Plaintiff)
- Although the statement does not expressly name Plaintiff, the recipients understood the statement to refer to Plaintiff because: [________________________________].
VI. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION — DEFAMATION PER QUOD
-
Plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs.
-
Defendant's statement, when understood in light of the extrinsic facts, constituted a false and defamatory assertion of fact concerning Plaintiff.
-
The statement was unprivileged and was published to one or more third parties.
-
Defendant acted with the requisite degree of fault:
- ☐ Negligence (private-figure plaintiff)
- ☐ Actual malice (public-figure / public-official plaintiff) -
As a direct and proximate result of the publication, Plaintiff suffered special damages as itemized below.
VII. SPECIAL DAMAGES
- Plaintiff has suffered the following specific, quantifiable economic losses directly caused by Defendant's defamatory statement:
| Item | Description | Amount | Causal Connection |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [________________________________] | $[____] | [________________________________] |
| 2 | [________________________________] | $[____] | [________________________________] |
| 3 | [________________________________] | $[____] | [________________________________] |
| 4 | [________________________________] | $[____] | [________________________________] |
-
Total Special Damages: $[________________________________]
-
In addition, Plaintiff seeks:
- ☐ General / compensatory damages for emotional distress and reputational harm
- ☐ Punitive damages based on Defendant's malice or reckless disregard
- ☐ Injunctive relief requiring retraction or removal
- ☐ Attorneys' fees and costs
VIII. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant;
B. Award special damages in the amount of $[________________________________];
C. Award general and compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
D. Award punitive damages in an amount sufficient to punish and deter;
E. Issue injunctive relief requiring Defendant to retract and remove the defamatory statement;
F. Award Plaintiff reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit; and
G. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
IX. VERIFICATION
I, [________________________________], declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of [________________________________] that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on [__/__/____] at [________________________________].
_________________________________________
Plaintiff Signature
X. SIGNATURE BLOCK
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________________
[________________________________]
Attorney for Plaintiff
State Bar No. [________________________________]
[________________________________] (Firm Name)
[________________________________] (Address)
[________________________________] (City, State, ZIP)
[________________________________] (Telephone)
[________________________________] (Email)
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES
| State | Key Variation |
|---|---|
| California | Cal. Civ. Code § 45a defines libel per quod; special damages required. CACI No. 1705 governs jury instructions. |
| New York | Must plead special damages with particularity; CPLR § 3016(a). Loss of specific, identified customers preferred. |
| Texas | Special damages must show actual, realized pecuniary loss. Hancock v. Variyam, 400 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2013). |
| Florida | Pre-suit notice required for media defendants under Fla. Stat. § 770.01. Special damages must be itemized. |
SOURCES AND REFERENCES
- Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 563, 575, 603 (1977)
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974)
- CACI Nos. 1701, 1705 (California — Defamation Per Quod)
- Tressler LLP, "The Special Damage Requirement in Defamation Per Quod Cases"
- Hancock v. Variyam, 400 S.W.3d 59 (Tex. 2013)
Need help customizing this document?
Get 3 days of intelligent editing. Tailor every section to your specific case.