Criminal Appeal Brief
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Cover Page
- Table of Authorities
- Issues Presented
- Statement of the Case
- Statement of the Grounds for Appellate Review
- Statement of the Facts
- Argument
- Conclusion
- Certificate of Compliance
- Certificate of Service
- Appendix
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA
| STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, | |
| No. [________________________________] | |
| v. | |
| [________________________________] County | |
| [DEFENDANT/APPELLANT FULL LEGAL NAME], | No. [________________________________] CRS |
| Defendant-Appellant. |
From the Superior Court of [________________________________] County
The Honorable [________________________________], Judge Presiding
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S BRIEF
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant:
[________________________________]
N.C. State Bar No. [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________], North Carolina [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
| Case | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) | [____] |
| Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) | [____] |
| State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506 (2012) | [____] |
| State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 (1985) | [____] |
| State v. Odom, 307 N.C. 655 (1983) | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
Statutes
| Statute | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444 | [____] |
| N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27 | [____] |
| N.C. Gen. Stat. § [________________________________] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
Rules
| Rule | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| N.C. R. App. P. 10 | [____] |
| N.C. R. App. P. 28 | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
ISSUES PRESENTED
I. Whether the trial court erred in [________________________________].
II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for [________________________________].
III. Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to [________________________________].
IV. [________________________________]
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On [__/__/____], Defendant-Appellant, [DEFENDANT/APPELLANT FULL LEGAL NAME], was charged by ☐ indictment / ☐ information in [________________________________] County Superior Court with:
| Count | Offense | N.C. Gen. Stat. |
|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | § [________________________________] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | § [________________________________] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | § [________________________________] |
[Summarize pretrial proceedings, motions, and rulings.]
[________________________________]
The case was tried at the [__/__/____] session of [________________________________] County Superior Court before the Honorable [________________________________] and a jury.
On [__/__/____], the jury returned a verdict of:
[________________________________]
(R p. [____]; T p. [____].)
The trial court entered judgment on [__/__/____], sentencing Defendant-Appellant to:
[________________________________]
(R p. [____].)
Defendant-Appellant gave notice of appeal in open court on [__/__/____]. (R p. [____]; T p. [____].)
STATEMENT OF THE GROUNDS FOR APPELLATE REVIEW
☐ Defendant-Appellant appeals as of right from a final judgment in a criminal case pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(a) and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-27(b).
☐ Defendant-Appellant appeals from a sentence imposed after conviction of a criminal offense pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(a1) or (a2).
☐ Defendant-Appellant seeks review by writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C. R. App. P. 21 and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(e).
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
A. State's Evidence
[________________________________]
(T p. [____].)
B. Defendant's Evidence
[________________________________]
(T p. [____].)
C. Jury Instructions and Verdict
[________________________________]
(T p. [____].)
ARGUMENT
I. [ISSUE ONE HEADING]
A. Standard of Review
☐ De novo review applies to questions of law and constitutional issues. (State v. Biber, 365 N.C. 162, 168 (2011).)
☐ Abuse of discretion applies to the trial court's evidentiary rulings and discretionary decisions. (State v. Hennis, 323 N.C. 279, 285 (1988).)
☐ Sufficiency of the evidence reviewed de novo: The court must determine whether substantial evidence, taken in the light most favorable to the State, of each essential element of the offense and of the defendant's being the perpetrator exists. (State v. Fritsch, 351 N.C. 373, 378 (2000).)
☐ Ineffective assistance of counsel: Under Strickland, the defendant must show deficient performance and prejudice. (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); State v. Braswell, 312 N.C. 553, 562 (1985).)
☐ Plain error review applies where no objection was made below. The defendant must show that the error was so fundamental that justice cannot have been done or that the error had a probable impact on the jury's verdict. (State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506, 518 (2012); State v. Odom, 307 N.C. 655, 660 (1983).)
B. Preservation
☐ This issue was preserved by timely objection. (T p. [____].)
☐ This issue was preserved by motion. (R p. [____].)
☐ This issue is reviewed for plain error under N.C. R. App. P. 10(a)(4).
☐ This constitutional issue is reviewable under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1446(d).
C. Argument
[________________________________]
(T p. [____]; R p. [____].)
D. Prejudice
☐ Constitutional error: The error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (State v. Castaneda, 196 N.C. App. 109, 116 (2009).)
☐ Non-constitutional error: A reasonable possibility exists that the error affected the verdict. (State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506, 518 (2012).)
[________________________________]
II. [ISSUE TWO HEADING]
A. Standard of Review
[________________________________]
B. Preservation
[________________________________]
C. Argument
[________________________________]
III. [ISSUE THREE HEADING]
[________________________________]
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Defendant-Appellant respectfully requests that this Court:
☐ Vacate the judgment and remand for a new trial.
☐ Arrest judgment and dismiss the charges.
☐ Vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
☐ Find no error in the trial proceedings.
☐ [________________________________]
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
N.C. State Bar No. [________________________________]
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant
Date: [__/__/____]
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I certify that this brief complies with the word-count limitation set forth in N.C. R. App. P. 28(j). This brief contains [________________________________] words, excluding the cover page, table of contents, table of authorities, certificate of compliance, certificate of service, and appendices.
_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
Date: [__/__/____]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Defendant-Appellant's Brief was served upon the following on [__/__/____] by:
☐ Depositing a copy in the United States mail, first class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic service
☐ Hand delivery
| Party | Address |
|---|---|
| North Carolina Attorney General's Office | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] County District Attorney | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
_________________________________________
[NAME]
Date: [__/__/____]
APPENDIX
☐ Appendix A: Judgment and Commitment Order
☐ Appendix B: Indictment
☐ Appendix C: Notice of Appeal
☐ Appendix D: [________________________________]
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES FOR NORTH CAROLINA
-
Notice of Appeal: In criminal cases, the defendant may give notice of appeal orally at trial or file written notice within 14 days after entry of judgment. (N.C. R. App. P. 4(a); N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1448(a).)
-
Word Limit: Court of Appeals: 8,750 words for principal briefs; 3,750 words for reply briefs. (N.C. R. App. P. 28(j).) The Supreme Court does not impose word limits.
-
Filing Deadline: Appellant's brief is due within 30 days after the record on appeal is filed. (N.C. R. App. P. 13(a)(1).)
-
Preservation: Under N.C. R. App. P. 10(a)(1), a party must have presented the trial court with a timely request, objection, or motion, stating the specific grounds, to preserve the issue. Limited exceptions exist for plain error and constitutional claims.
-
Anders/Kinch Brief: If appointed counsel finds no meritorious issues, counsel may file an Anders brief. Under State v. Kinch, 314 N.C. 99 (1985), counsel must advise the defendant of the right to file a pro se brief and the court must independently review the record.
-
Guilty Plea Appeals: A defendant who pleads guilty generally may not appeal except to challenge the sentence or raise issues specifically preserved prior to the plea. (N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(a2).)
-
MAR (Motion for Appropriate Relief): Under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1415, a defendant may file a motion for appropriate relief in the trial court, which may be used to raise issues not raised on direct appeal, such as ineffective assistance of counsel.
-
Discretionary Review by Supreme Court: After the Court of Appeals decision, a petition for discretionary review to the North Carolina Supreme Court may be filed within 15 days. (N.C. R. App. P. 15(b).)
-
Appointed Appellate Counsel: In capital and non-capital felony cases, the Office of the Appellate Defender or the Indigent Defense Services may appoint appellate counsel.
About This Template
Criminal law paperwork covers every stage of a criminal case, from the first appearance and bail motion through pretrial motions, plea agreements, sentencing, and appeals. Deadlines in criminal cases are short and often unforgiving, and constitutional rights can be waived just by missing a filing. Using the right motion at the right time can mean the difference between evidence getting suppressed, charges getting reduced, or a case getting dismissed entirely.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: April 2026