TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Cover Page
2. Table of Authorities
3. Statement of Jurisdiction
4. Issues Presented for Review
5. Statement of the Case
6. Statement of Facts
7. Standard of Review
8. Argument
9. Conclusion
10. Certificate of Compliance
11. Certificate of Service

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF ARIZONA

DIVISION [ONE / TWO]

APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF

Attorney for Appellant:

[________________________________]
State Bar No. [________________________________]
[________________________________]
[________________________________], Arizona [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Cases

Statutes

Rules

I. STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

This appeal is taken from a final judgment of conviction and sentence entered on [__/__/____] in the Superior Court of Arizona, [________________________________] County, the Honorable [________________________________] presiding. The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4033(A) and Ariz. Const. Art. VI, § 9.

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal on [__/__/____].

☐ The notice of appeal was filed within 20 days after entry of judgment and sentence (Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.3(a)).
☐ The case proceeded to trial (direct appeal available).
☐ The appeal is from a post-trial order entered on [__/__/____].

II. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW

1. Whether the trial court erred in [________________________________].

2. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for [________________________________].

3. Whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by [________________________________].

4. [________________________________]

III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On or about [__/__/____], an ☐ indictment / ☐ information / ☐ complaint was filed in the Superior Court of Arizona, [________________________________] County, charging Appellant with:

[Summarize significant pretrial proceedings, motions, and rulings.]

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the case proceeded to ☐ jury trial / ☐ bench trial.

On [__/__/____], the jury returned a verdict of:

[________________________________]

On [__/__/____], the trial court sentenced Appellant to:

[________________________________]

(R.T. [____]; R.O.A. [____].)

IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS

A. State's Case

[________________________________]

(R.T. [____].)

B. Defense Case

[________________________________]

(R.T. [____].)

V. STANDARD OF REVIEW

Issue 1: [________________________________]

☐ De novo review applies to questions of law, including statutory interpretation and constitutional questions. (State v. Hansen, 215 Ariz. 287, 160 P.3d 166 (2007).)

☐ Abuse of discretion applies to the trial court's discretionary rulings, including evidentiary rulings and sentencing. (State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549, 858 P.2d 1152 (1993).)

☐ Sufficiency of the evidence — viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the verdict, a reviewing court determines whether substantial evidence supports the conviction. (State v. Mathers, 165 Ariz. 64, 796 P.2d 866 (1990).)

☐ Fundamental error review applies when no objection was made below. The defendant must show the error (1) went to the foundation of the case, (2) took from the defendant a right essential to the defense, or (3) was so egregious that the defendant could not have received a fair trial. (State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, 115 P.3d 601 (2005).)

Issue 2: [________________________________]

VI. ARGUMENT

A. [ISSUE ONE HEADING]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[Describe the trial court proceedings relevant to this issue with record citations.]

(R.T. [____]; R.O.A. [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice

☐ Under Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), the constitutional error was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because [________________________________].

☐ Under the Arizona harmless error standard, the error was not harmless because it is not possible to say beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict. (State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. at 588.)

B. [ISSUE TWO HEADING]

[________________________________]

1. Relevant Proceedings Below

[________________________________]

(R.T. [____]; R.O.A. [____].)

2. Applicable Legal Principles

[________________________________]

3. Analysis

[________________________________]

4. Prejudice

[________________________________]

C. [ADDITIONAL ISSUES AS NEEDED]

[________________________________]

VII. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Appellant respectfully requests that this Court:

☐ Reverse the judgment of conviction and remand with directions to enter a judgment of acquittal.
☐ Reverse the judgment and remand for a new trial.
☐ Vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
☐ Modify the judgment as follows: [________________________________].
☐ [________________________________]

Respectfully submitted,

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
Attorney for Appellant

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.13, I certify that this brief contains [________________________________] words, as counted by [________________________________] word-processing program. This brief does not exceed the 14,000-word limit for opening briefs.

Date: [__/__/____]

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, [________________________________], hereby certify that on [__/__/____], I served the foregoing Appellant's Opening Brief on the following parties by the method indicated:

☐ U.S. Mail, first-class, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic filing via TurboCourt/eFiling
☐ Hand delivery

_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]

STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES FOR ARIZONA

1. Notice of Appeal Deadline: Must be filed within 20 days after entry of judgment and sentence (Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.3(a)).

2. Word Limit: Opening brief may not exceed 14,000 words; reply brief may not exceed 7,000 words (Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.10).

3. Appellant's Brief Due: Within 40 days after the filing of the transcript on appeal (Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.10(a)).

4. Appellee's Brief Due: Within 40 days after service of the opening brief (Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.10(b)).

5. No Appeal After Guilty Plea: A defendant who pleads guilty or no contest generally cannot pursue a direct appeal; review is through Rule 32 (post-conviction relief), except as to the voluntariness of the plea or legality of the sentence.

6. Anders/Leon Brief: When appointed counsel finds no meritorious issues, counsel must file a brief complying with State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), identifying potential issues and requesting the court to search the record.

7. Fundamental Error: Unpreserved errors are reviewed only for fundamental error under State v. Henderson, 210 Ariz. 561, 115 P.3d 601 (2005).

8. Death Penalty Appeals: Appeals in capital cases go directly to the Arizona Supreme Court (A.R.S. § 13-4031).