Criminal Appeal Brief
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Cover Page
- Table of Authorities
- Statement of Jurisdiction
- Statement of Questions Presented
- Statement of Facts
- Argument
- Relief Requested
- Certificate of Service
- Appendix
IN THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
| PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, | |
| Plaintiff-Appellee, | Court of Appeals No. [________________________________] |
| v. | Circuit Court No. [________________________________] |
| [DEFENDANT/APPELLANT FULL LEGAL NAME], | |
| Defendant-Appellant. |
Appeal from the [________________________________] County Circuit Court
The Honorable [________________________________], Circuit Judge
☐ ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT'S BRIEF ON APPEAL
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant:
[________________________________]
P[________________________________] (State Bar of Michigan)
[________________________________]
[________________________________], Michigan [________________________________]
Telephone: [________________________________]
Email: [________________________________]
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
| Case | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) | [____] |
| Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) | [____] |
| People v. Carines, 460 Mich. 750 (1999) | [____] |
| People v. Ullah, 216 Mich. App. 669 (1996) | [____] |
| People v. Ginther, 390 Mich. 436 (1973) | [____] |
| People v. Wolfe, 440 Mich. 508 (1992) | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
Statutes
| Statute | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| MCL 770.1 | [____] |
| MCL 770.3 | [____] |
| MCL [________________________________] | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
Rules
| Rule | Page(s) |
|---|---|
| MCR 7.204 | [____] |
| MCR 7.212 | [____] |
| [________________________________] | [____] |
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to Michigan Constitution Article VI, Section 10, and MCL 770.3.
The trial court entered the judgment of sentence on [__/__/____]. Defendant-Appellant filed a timely claim of appeal on [__/__/____], within ☐ 42 days of sentencing (MCR 7.204(A)(2)) / ☐ 6 months of sentencing by leave of court.
☐ Defendant-Appellant appeals as of right from a conviction following a ☐ jury trial / ☐ bench trial.
☐ Defendant-Appellant appeals by leave granted on [__/__/____].
STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS PRESENTED
I. Whether the trial court erred in [________________________________].
Defendant-Appellant answers: Yes.
Trial Court answered: No.
II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction for [________________________________].
Defendant-Appellant answers: No.
Trial Court answered: Yes.
III. Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to [________________________________].
Defendant-Appellant answers: Yes.
Trial Court answered: [Did not address / No.]
IV. [________________________________]
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. Charges and Pretrial Proceedings
On [__/__/____], Defendant-Appellant was charged by ☐ Information / ☐ Indictment in the [________________________________] County Circuit Court with:
| Count | Offense | MCL Citation | Maximum Penalty |
|---|---|---|---|
| [____] | [________________________________] | MCL [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | MCL [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
| [____] | [________________________________] | MCL [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
[Summarize pretrial proceedings.]
[________________________________]
B. Trial Evidence
Prosecution's Case:
[________________________________]
(T. [____].)
Defense Case:
[________________________________]
(T. [____].)
C. Verdict and Sentencing
On [__/__/____], the ☐ jury returned a verdict of / ☐ court found Defendant-Appellant:
[________________________________]
(T. [____].)
On [__/__/____], the trial court sentenced Defendant-Appellant to:
[________________________________]
(Sentencing T. [____].)
☐ The sentence falls within / ☐ departs from the Michigan Sentencing Guidelines range of [________________________________].
ARGUMENT
I. [ISSUE ONE HEADING]
A. Standard of Review
☐ De novo review applies to constitutional questions and questions of law. (People v. Ullah, 216 Mich. App. 669, 673 (1996).)
☐ Abuse of discretion applies to evidentiary rulings and other discretionary trial court decisions. An abuse of discretion occurs when the trial court's decision falls outside the range of principled outcomes. (People v. Babcock, 469 Mich. 247, 269 (2003).)
☐ Sufficiency of the evidence: The court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether a rational trier of fact could find the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Wolfe, 440 Mich. 508, 515 (1992); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979).)
☐ Great weight of the evidence: A new trial may be granted if the evidence preponderates so heavily against the verdict that it would be a miscarriage of justice to allow the verdict to stand. (People v. Lemmon, 456 Mich. 625, 642-43 (1998).)
☐ Ineffective assistance of counsel: Under Strickland, the defendant must show deficient performance and prejudice. (Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); People v. Carbin, 463 Mich. 590, 599-600 (2001).)
☐ Plain error review applies to unpreserved issues. The defendant must show: (1) error occurred, (2) the error was plain, and (3) the error affected substantial rights. (People v. Carines, 460 Mich. 750, 763 (1999).)
B. Argument
[________________________________]
(T. [____].)
C. Prejudice / Harm Analysis
☐ Preserved constitutional error: Reversal required unless the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Anderson, 446 Mich. 392, 405 (1994).)
☐ Preserved non-constitutional error: The error is presumed not to be a ground for reversal unless it affirmatively appears that it is more probable than not that the error was outcome-determinative. (People v. Lukity, 460 Mich. 484, 495-96 (1999).)
☐ Unpreserved error (plain error): Reversal is warranted only when the plain error resulted in the conviction of an actually innocent defendant or seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. (People v. Carines, 460 Mich. 750, 763-64 (1999).)
[________________________________]
II. [ISSUE TWO HEADING]
A. Standard of Review
[________________________________]
B. Argument
[________________________________]
III. [ISSUE THREE HEADING]
[________________________________]
RELIEF REQUESTED
Defendant-Appellant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court:
☐ Reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial.
☐ Reverse the conviction and enter a judgment of acquittal.
☐ Vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
☐ Remand for a Ginther hearing on the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
☐ [________________________________]
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
P[________________________________]
Attorney for Defendant-Appellant
Date: [__/__/____]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on [__/__/____], I served a copy of this Defendant-Appellant's Brief on Appeal upon the following by:
☐ First-class U.S. mail, postage prepaid
☐ Electronic filing via TrueFiling
☐ Personal delivery
| Party | Address |
|---|---|
| [________________________________] County Prosecuting Attorney | [________________________________] |
| [________________________________] | [________________________________] |
_________________________________________
[ATTORNEY NAME]
APPENDIX
☐ Appendix A: Judgment of Sentence
☐ Appendix B: Register of Actions
☐ Appendix C: Sentencing Information Report (SIR)
☐ Appendix D: Jury Instructions
☐ Appendix E: [________________________________]
STATE-SPECIFIC NOTES FOR MICHIGAN
-
Claim of Appeal: Must be filed within 42 days after entry of the judgment of sentence. (MCR 7.204(A)(2).) For delayed appeals, an application for leave must be filed within 6 months. (MCR 7.205(F)(3).)
-
Page Limit: 50 pages double-spaced, exclusive of tables, indexes, and appendixes. Reply briefs: 10 pages. (MCR 7.212(B).)
-
Font and Format: At least 12-point type; one-inch margins; printing on one side only.
-
Oral Argument: A party filing a timely brief is entitled to oral argument by writing "ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED" on the title page. (MCR 7.212.)
-
Ginther Hearing: To develop a record for an ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim, the defendant may move for a remand for an evidentiary hearing (a Ginther hearing). (People v. Ginther, 390 Mich. 436 (1973).)
-
Anders Brief: If appointed counsel finds no meritorious issues, counsel must file an Anders brief and move to withdraw. The court independently reviews the record. (Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).)
-
Sentencing Guidelines: Michigan uses advisory sentencing guidelines. Departures from the guidelines range must be supported by substantial and compelling reasons articulated on the record. (People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358 (2015).)
-
Standard 4 Brief: A defendant represented by appointed counsel may file a pro se supplemental brief (Standard 4 brief) raising additional issues. (MCR 7.211(C)(1).)
-
Application for Leave to Appeal to Supreme Court: After the Court of Appeals decision, an application for leave to appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court must be filed within 56 days. (MCR 7.305(C)(2).)
-
6500 Motion: A defendant may file a motion for relief from judgment under MCR 6.500 et seq. for post-conviction claims not raised on direct appeal, such as newly discovered evidence or ineffective assistance.
About This Template
Criminal law paperwork covers every stage of a criminal case, from the first appearance and bail motion through pretrial motions, plea agreements, sentencing, and appeals. Deadlines in criminal cases are short and often unforgiving, and constitutional rights can be waived just by missing a filing. Using the right motion at the right time can mean the difference between evidence getting suppressed, charges getting reduced, or a case getting dismissed entirely.
Important Notice
This template is provided for informational purposes. It is not legal advice. We recommend having an attorney review any legal document before signing, especially for high-value or complex matters.
Last updated: April 2026