Is a New York corporation owned by tribal members and operating entirely on an Indian reservation exempt from Article 9-A franchise tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current New York tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Basil J. Cook Enterprises, Inc. is a New York corporation that manages a bingo operation located entirely on the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation in northern New York. All of its shareholders are members of the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe. It asked (1) whether it is exempt from the New York business corporation franchise tax, and (2) whether it must compute the business allocation percentage for the minimum taxable income base.
It is not exempt. Federal Indian law does let a resident tribe member earn income on the reservation free of state personal income tax (McClanahan; Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Sac & Fox Nation). But this taxpayer is not an individual tribe member -- it is a New York domestic corporation, an entity created under New York law and subject to the state's general civil jurisdiction. Federal treaties and laws do not prohibit states from taxing income earned by non-members -- including a corporation -- on tribal land (Mescalero Apache Tribe v. Jones). Under section 209.1, every corporation owes the franchise tax for the privilege of its franchise, and a domestic corporation is subject to all New York laws generally applicable to corporations.
Reservation land is "within New York." For the business allocation percentage (sections 210.3 and 210.3-a), the portion of the St. Regis Mohawk Reservation that lies in the United States (as opposed to the Canadian portion) is physically located within New York and must be treated as within New York. So the corporation's reservation income is allocated to New York.
What this means for you
A corporation is not a tribe member
The personal-income-tax exemption for reservation income belongs to resident individual tribe members. A corporation -- even one wholly owned by tribe members -- is a separate taxpayer subject to New York's franchise tax.
Doing business on a reservation does not move you out of New York
The U.S. portion of the reservation is in New York for tax purposes, so income earned there is New York income for the allocation percentage.
Choice of entity matters
The opinion notes that members operating as a partnership or sole proprietorship might be treated differently; incorporating created a New York taxpayer.
Common questions
Q: Our corporation is owned entirely by tribe members and operates only on the reservation. Are we exempt? A: No. The corporation is a New York taxpayer subject to Article 9-A; the federal exemption protects individual resident tribe members, not corporations.
Q: Is reservation income allocated to New York?
A: Yes. The U.S. portion of the reservation is physically within New York, so it counts as "within New York" for the business allocation percentage.
Q: Would a partnership or sole proprietorship be treated the same? A: Possibly not -- the opinion distinguishes individual resident tribe members, who may earn reservation income free of state personal income tax.
Citations and references
Statutes, regulations, and authorities:
- Tax Law section 209.1 (franchise tax on every corporation)
- Tax Law section 210.1 (tax bases) and section 210.3 / 210.3-a (business allocation percentage)
- 20 NYCRR 1-2.3 (definition of corporation and domestic corporation)
Source
- Landing page: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pubs_and_bulls/advisory_opinions/corporation_ao_1993.htm
- Opinion: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/advisory_opinions/corporation/a93_17c.pdf
Original ruling text
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau
TSB-A-93 (17) C
Corporation Tax
October 12, 1993
STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION
PETITION NO. C930422A
On April 22, 1993, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Basil J. Cook Enterprises, Inc., PO Box 480, Route #37, Hogansburg, New York 13655. The issues raised by Petitioner, Basil J. Cook Enterprises, Inc., are whether Petitioner whose business is performed entirely on a recognized Indian Reservation and is owned by tribal member stockholders is exempt from New York State business corporation franchise tax, and if a New York State corporation doing business on a recognized Indian Reservation, is subject to "Computation of Business Allocation Percentage for Minimum Taxable Income Base" Petitioner manages a bingo operation located on the St. Regis Mohawk Indian Reservation An northern New York State. Petitioner conducts all of its business on the St. Regis Mohawk Indian Reservation and is incorporated as a New York State corporation. All stockholders are members of the St. Regis Mohawk Indian Tribe. Petitioner contends that if the shareholders of this corporation were partners in a partnership or were a sole proprietorship conducting all its business on the reservation, they would not be subject to New York State personal income tax, and Petitioner questions whether the New York corporation should be treated differently. It is true that, pursuant to federal Indian law, tribe members residing on a reservation may earn income on that reservation without incurring any liability for State personal income taxes. See, Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v Sac & Fox Nation, _ US _ (dec. May 17, 1993), and McClanahan v Arizona State Tax Comm'n, 411 US 164 (1973). However, even if it is assumed that all of the shareholders of Petitioner are resident members of the St. Regis Mohawk Nation, the instant situation does not involve income earned by resident tribe members on a reservation. The entity earning the income in question is not a member of the St. Regis Mohawk Nation residing on that Nation's reservation. It is a New York domestic corporation that (unlike a resident Indian tribe member) is subject to New York State's general civil jurisdiction. Federal Indian treaties and laws do not prohibit states from imposing taxes on income earned by non-Indians and non-members located on the reservation or other lands of a tribe or nation. (411 US 145 (1973) Mescalero Apache Tribe v Jones) Section 1-2.3(a) of the Business Corporation Franchise Tax Regulations (hereinafter "Regulations") defines a corporation as an entity created as such under the laws of the United States, any state, territory or possession thereof, the District of Columbia, or any foreign country, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, which provides a medium for the conducting of TP-9 (9/88)
-2
TSB-A-93 (17) C
Corporation Tax
October 12, 1993
business and the sharing of its gains. Section 1-2.3(a)(1) of the Regulations defines the term domestic corporation as a corporation incorporated by or under the laws of New York State. Section 209.1 of the Tax Law imposes, annually, a franchise tax on every corporation for the privilege of exercising its corporate franchise, or of doing business, or of employing capital, or of owning or leasing property in New York State in a corporate or organized capacity, or of maintaining an office in New York State for all or any part of each of its fiscal or calendar years. As a domestic corporation, Petitioner is subject to all New York State Laws generally applicable to domestic corporations, including the New York State business corporation franchise tax imposed under Article 9-A of the Tax Law. Petitioner also asks whether it is subject to the "Computation of Business Allocation Percentage for Minimum Taxable Income Base". Section 210.1 of the Tax Law provides that the tax imposed by section 209.1 of the Tax Law shall be the sum of (1) the highest of the amounts prescribed in paragraphs (a) [entire net income base], (b) [capital base], (c) [minimum taxable bases] and (d) [fixed dollar minimum] of section 210.1 and (2) the amount prescribed in paragraph (e)
[subsidiary capital base] of section 210.1. A taxpayer's entire net income base means the portion of the taxpayer's entire net income allocated within New York State. A taxpayer's minimum taxable income base means the portion of the taxpayer's minimum taxable income allocated within New York State. The business allocation percentage is computed pursuant to section 210.3(a) of the Tax Law, and the business allocation percentage for minimum taxable income base is computed pursuant to section 210.3-a of the Tax Law. The portion of the St. Regis Mohawk Indian Reservation that is located in the United States (as opposed to the Canadian portion) is physically located within New York State, and such portion must be treated as "within New York" for purposes of computing the business allocation percentage and the business allocation percentage for minimum taxable income.
DATED: October 12, 1993
s/PAUL B. COBURN
Deputy Director
Taxpayer Services Division
NOTE: The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions
are limited to the facts set forth therein.
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current New York tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace