Is a $100 million Section 468B civil claims settlement fund subject to New York franchise tax or New York State and City personal income tax, and what must it file?

Short answer No tax, no return. The Salomon civil claims fund -- a $100 million settlement fund created by federal court order and treated as a qualified settlement fund under Section 468B -- is not subject to New York franchise tax or to New York State or City personal income tax. For Article 9-A, the fund administrator only holds, invests, and distributes the money, which is not conducting a business, so the fund is not a corporation under Tax Law section 208.1. For Article 22, a Section 468B fund is not treated as a trust federally, so it is not a trust under section 607(a), and section 601(g) excludes entities taxed as corporations federally. New York City follows the State. Because the fund is not a taxable entity, it has no New York franchise or personal income tax filing or reporting obligations.
State
NY
Ruling
TSB-A-93(12)C, (6)I
Tax type
Corporation Tax; Income Tax
Issued
1993-05-27
Issued by
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Taxpayer Services Division, Technical Services Bureau
Requested by
The Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc Civil Claims Fund (Joel L. Carr, Administrator)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current New York tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Taxpayer Services Division, Technical Services Bureau at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc Civil Claims Fund was a $100 million settlement fund established by order of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to settle the SEC v. Salomon action over government securities sold at auction. The fund held only cash and short-term Treasury bills, its administrator's office was in New York, and it elected to be treated as a qualified settlement fund under Section 468B. The administrator asked (1) whether the fund's income is subject to New York franchise tax or New York State and City personal income tax, and (2) what the fund must file.

The fund is not taxable in New York, and it has no filing obligations.

Not a corporation (Article 9-A). Under Tax Law section 208.1 and the regulation, a fund administrator who merely holds, invests, and distributes the fund's money is not conducting a business -- "the mere investment of funds and the collection of income therefrom" is not a business. So the fund is not deemed a corporation and owes no franchise tax. The opinion follows Buxbaum, TSB-A-93(10)C.

Not a trust (Articles 22 and 30). A Section 468B fund is not treated as a trust for federal income tax (Treasury Reg. 1.468B-1(b)), so under section 607(a) it is not a trust for Article 22; and section 601(g) excludes entities taxed federally as corporations (which a Section 468B fund is, on its modified gross income). The New York City personal income tax follows.

No filings. Because the fund is not a taxable entity for New York State or City purposes, it has no New York franchise tax or personal income tax filing or reporting obligations.

What this means for you

A court-ordered claims fund is not a New York corporation

A Section 468B settlement fund whose administrator only invests and pays out the money is not "doing business," so it is outside Article 9-A.

It is not a trust and owes no personal income tax

Because the fund is not a trust federally, it is not one under section 607(a); section 601(g) also keeps corporation-taxed entities out of Article 22, and the City follows the State.

No return is required

A non-taxable fund has no New York State or City filing or reporting obligations.

Common questions

Q: Does a Section 468B civil claims fund owe New York franchise tax? A: No. Holding, investing, and distributing the fund's money is not conducting a business, so the fund is not a corporation under Article 9-A.

Q: Is the fund subject to New York or City personal income tax? A: No. It is not a trust federally (so not under section 607(a)), and section 601(g) excludes entities taxed as corporations; the City follows the State.

Q: Does the fund have to file New York returns? A: No. Because it is not a taxable entity, it has no New York State or City franchise or personal income tax filing or reporting obligations.

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and authorities:

  • Tax Law section 209.1 (franchise tax on every corporation)
  • Tax Law section 208.1 (definition of corporation; includes associations and business trusts)
  • Tax Law section 607(a) (Article 22 terms follow federal income tax meaning)
  • Tax Law section 601(g) (entity taxable as a corporation federally is not subject to Article 22)
  • 20 NYCRR 1-2.3 (definition of corporation; activities of a trustee)
  • IRC section 468B and Treasury Regulation section 1.468B-1 (qualified settlement funds)
  • Treasury Regulation section 301.7701-4 (classification of trusts)

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

TSB-A-93 (12) C
Corporation Tax
TSB-A-93 (6) I
Income Tax
May 27, 1993

Taxpayer Services Division
Technical Services Bureau
STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. Z930315A

On March 15, 1993, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from The Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc Civil Claims Fund, c/o Joel L. Carr, Civil Claims Fund Administrator, 300 Old Country Road, Suite 241, Mineola, New York 11501. The issues raised by Petitioner, The Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc Civil Claims Fund (hereinafter "The Fund"), are (1) whether the income earned by The Fund is subject to New York State corporation franchise tax or New York State and New York City personal income taxes and (2) what are The Fund's filing or reporting obligations. The Fund is a $100 million settlement fund established by order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on May 26, 1992 in connection with the settlement of an action pending in such court entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc. Claims may be made against The Fund for, among other things, compensatory damages arising from activities of Salomon Inc and Salomon Brothers Inc in connection with government securities sold at auction. The Fund consists solely of cash and short-term United States treasury bills held through the Court Registry Investment System maintained by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The Fund administrator's office is located in Mineola, New York. For federal income tax purposes, The Fund will be treated as a qualified settlement fund under section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code and section 1.468B-1 of the Treasury Regulations. The Fund will elect to be treated as a qualified settlement fund with respect to the period beginning as of the date of its inception in 1992. Section 209.1 of the Tax Law imposes, annually, a franchise tax on every corporation for the privilege of exercising its corporate franchise, or of doing business, or of employing capital, or of owning or leasing property in New York State in a corporate or organized capacity, or of maintaining an office in New York State for all or any part of each of its fiscal or calendar years. Section 208.1 of the Tax Law provides that: The term "corporation" includes an association, within the meaning of paragraph three of subsection (a) of section seventy-seven hundred one of the internal revenue code, a joint-stock company or association, a publicly traded partnership treated as a corporation for purposes of the internal revenue code pursuant to section seventy-seven hundred TP-9 (9/88)

-2­

TSB-A-93 (12) C
Corporation Tax
TSB-A-93 (6) I
Income Tax
May 27, 1993

four thereof and any business conducted by a trustee or trustees wherein interest or ownership is evidenced by certificate or other written instrument ... The term "corporation" is defined in section 1-2.3 of the Business Corporation Franchise Tax Regulations, which provides, in part, that: (a) The term 'corporation' means an entity created as such under the laws of the United States, any state, territory or possession thereof, the District of Columbia, or any foreign country, or any political subdivision of any of the foregoing, which provides a medium for the conducting of business and the sharing of its gains.
. . .
(b) ... An entity conducted as a corporation is deemed to be a corporation.
. . .
(2) A business conducted by a trustee or trustees in which interest or ownership is evidenced by certificate or other written instrument includes, but is not limited to, an association commonly referred to as a business trust or Massachusetts trust. In determining whether a trustee or trustees are conducting a business, the form of the agreement is of significance but is not controlling. The actual activities of the trustee or trustees, not their purposes and powers, will be regarded as decisive factors in determining whether a trust is subject to tax under article 9-A of the Tax Law. The mere investment of funds and the collection of income therefrom, with incidental replacement of securities and reinvestment of funds, does not constitute the conduct of a business in the case of a business conducted by a trustee or trustees .... For New York State franchise tax purposes, an unincorporated entity is not taxed as a corporation unless its activities are conducted in a manner whereby the entity presents itself as a corporation, in which case it is deemed to be a corporation. The conduct of business is more than the ownership of property and the collection and distribution of income derived from that property. (Smadbeck v St Tax Comm, 33 NY2d 930 (1973); People ex rel Nauss v Graves, 283 NY 383, 386 (1940)). It is "more than the mere investment of funds and the collection of income therefrom, with the incidental replacement of securities and the reinvestment of funds that constitute the corpus, as in the case of an ordinary trust." (Burrell v Lynch 274 AD 347,352 (1948); see also, City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v Graves, 272 NY 1, 6 (1936)).

-3­

TSB-A-93 (12) C
Corporation Tax
TSB-A-93 (6) I
Income Tax
May 27, 1993

Herein, the activities of the administrator of The Fund, do not constitute the conduct of a business as contemplated by section 208.1 of the Tax Law and section 1-2.3 of the Business Corporation Franchise Tax Regulations. (See Samuel R. Buxbaum, Administrator Buxbaum-Banco Popular Settlement Fund, Adv 0p Comm T
& F, April 30, 1993, TSB-A-93(10)C.) Accordingly, The Fund is not deemed to be a corporation for purposes of Article 9-A and is not subject to the tax imposed by such Article. With respect to the New York State personal income tax under Article 22 of the Tax Law, the tax is imposed on resident and nonresident trusts. Section 607(a) of the Tax Law provides, in pertinent part, that: Any term used in this article shall have the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the laws of the United States relating to federal income taxes, unless a different meaning is clearly required .... For federal income tax purposes, The Fund is a qualified settlement fund. Pursuant to section 1.468B-l(b) of the Treasury Regulations, a fund, account, or trust that is a qualified settlement fund that could be classified as a trust within the meaning of section 301.7701-4 of the Treasury Regulations, is classified as a qualified settlement fund for all purposes of the Internal Revenue Code. Accordingly, since The Fund is not treated as a trust for federal income tax purposes, The Fund, pursuant to section 607(a) of the Tax Law, is not treated as a trust for purposes of Article 22 of the Tax Law. (See Samuel R. Buxbaum, Administrator Buxbaum-Banco Popular Settlement Fund, Adv Op Comm T & F, April 30, 1993, TSB-A-93(10)C.) Further, section 601(g) of the Tax Law provides that an association, trust or other unincorporated organization which is taxable as a corporation for federal income tax purposes shall not be subject to tax under Article 22 of the Tax Law. Herein, The Fund is a qualified settlement fund under section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code and pursuant to such section, The Fund is a person for federal income tax purposes that is taxed on its modified gross income and the tax imposed is treated as a tax on corporations. Accordingly, The Fund is not subject to the tax imposed under Article 22 of the Tax Law. The New York City personal income tax is similar to the New York State personal income tax and is administered by New York State the same as Article 22 of the Tax Law. Accordingly, The Fund is not treated as a trust for New York City personal income tax purposes and The Fund is not subject to the New York City personal income tax authorized under Article 30 of the Tax Law.

-4­

TSB-A-93 (12) C
Corporation Tax
TSB-A-93 (6) I
Income Tax
May 27, 1993

After determining that The Fund is not a taxable entity for New York State and New York City tax purposes, The Fund has no New York State franchise tax or New York State or New York City personal income filing or reporting obligations.

DATED: May 27, 1993

s/PAUL B. COBURN
Deputy Director
Taxpayer Services Division

NOTE: The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions are limited to the facts set forth therein.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current New York tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace