NY TSB-A-24(18)S Sales Tax 2024-08-01

Is a prescription-only portable electrotherapy device (a TENS/muscle stimulator) exempt from New York sales tax as medical equipment?

Short answer: Exempt. The Department concluded that the petitioner's Multi-Mode Stimulator — a prescription-only (FDA Class II) portable electrotherapy/TENS device used to treat pain, muscle spasms, and similar conditions — is exempt medical equipment under Tax Law § 1115(a)(3). It is primarily and customarily used for medical purposes and is not useful in the absence of illness or injury (it can't build muscle). And because the patient's insurer pays for it and it is dispensed to the patient, it is sold to the patient — not to a practitioner for use in performing paid medical services, which would have made it taxable.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked at the bottom of this page, or PDF in the sidebar) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An out-of-state seller of durable medical equipment asked whether its Multi-Mode Stimulator — a portable electrotherapy/TENS device used to treat pain, relax muscle spasms, improve circulation, prevent disuse atrophy, and aid post-surgical recovery — is subject to New York sales tax. The device is an FDA Class II product that requires a prescription. The Department concluded it is exempt.

New York taxes retail sales of tangible personal property (Tax Law § 1105(a)), but Tax Law § 1115(a)(3) exempts medical equipment and suppliesunless purchased at retail for use in performing medical services for compensation. Exempt medical equipment must be primarily and customarily used for medical purposes and not generally useful in the absence of illness, injury, or physical incapacity (20 NYCRR 528.4(e)(2)); exemptions are strictly construed, with the burden on the claimant (20 NYCRR 528.1(c)).

The device cleared both hurdles. Even though the Department had earlier said ordinary electrical muscle stimulators can be useful for non-medical purposes (TSB-A-12(15)S), this device is prescription-only, used to treat specific conditions, and cannot build muscle — so it isn't useful absent illness or injury. And on the "for compensation" exclusion: the practitioners don't buy the device (they hold consignment inventory, return unsold units, and exchange no money); instead, the patient's insurer pays the seller and the device is dispensed to the patient. So it's sold to the patient, not to a practitioner for use in providing paid medical services — keeping it exempt.

What this means for you

Medical device makers and DME suppliers

A device is more likely to be exempt medical equipment when it's prescription-required, used to treat conditions, and not useful for general (non-medical) purposes like fitness. Marketing or capabilities that make a device "useful in the absence of illness" can cost you the exemption — the same product category can be taxable or exempt depending on these facts.

Watch the "sold for use in paid services" trap

The § 1115(a)(3) exemption is lost if the equipment is bought for use in performing medical services for compensation. The consignment-plus-insurance model here mattered: because the patient (through insurance) was the buyer and the device was dispensed to the patient, it stayed exempt. Selling the same device to a clinic that uses it on patients for a fee can flip it to taxable.

Accountants and tax professionals

Run the two-part § 1115(a)(3) analysis: (1) is it primarily/customarily medical and not useful absent illness (528.4(e)(2)), and (2) who is the buyer and is it for compensated services? Document the prescription requirement and the payment flow; exemptions are strictly construed (528.1(c)).

Common questions

Q: Is a TENS / electrotherapy device taxable in New York?
A: It depends. Here a prescription-only device used to treat medical conditions and not useful for building muscle was exempt medical equipment. Devices useful in the absence of illness or injury can be taxable.

Q: Why did the prescription requirement matter?
A: It supported the conclusion that the device is primarily and customarily used for medical purposes and not generally useful absent illness or injury — a requirement for the exemption.

Q: What's the "for compensation" exclusion?
A: Medical equipment loses the exemption if bought for use in performing medical services for compensation. Here the device was sold to the patient (paid by insurance), not to a practitioner providing paid services, so the exclusion didn't apply.

Q: Can my business rely on this opinion?
A: Not as binding. A TSB-A advisory opinion binds the Department only as to the petitioner and the exact facts described. Use it to understand the reasoning, then check your own facts.

Citations and references

New York Tax Law and regulations:
- Tax Law § 1105(a) — sales tax on retail sales of tangible personal property
- Tax Law § 1115(a)(3) — exemption for medical equipment and supplies (unless for use in paid medical services)
- 20 NYCRR 528.4(e)(2) — definition of exempt medical equipment (primarily medical; not useful absent illness)
- 20 NYCRR 528.1(c) — exemptions strictly construed; burden on the person claiming

Guidance cited:
- TSB-A-12(15)S — ordinary electrical muscle stimulators can be useful for non-medical purposes (distinguished)

Source

Original ruling text

Sales Tax
August 1, 2024
Office of Counsel

The Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for Advisory Opinion from [ redacted ] (“Petitioner”). Petitioner asks whether receipts from the sale of its Multi-Mode Stimulator (“Device”) are subject to sales tax. We conclude that Petitioner’s Device is medical equipment exempt from sales tax, because it is not sold for use in performing medical services for compensation.

Facts

Petitioner sells durable medical equipment from its headquarters and sole business location outside New York State. Among the products it sells to New York customers is the Device, a portable electrotherapy device used to treat and alleviate chronic and acute pain, as well as to treat certain types of muscular injuries. The Device is prescribed specifically to treat various types of pain, to relax muscle spasms, increase blood flow circulation, or prevent disuse atrophy. The Device also may be prescribed for muscle re-education, maintaining or increasing range of motion, or for immediate post-surgical stimulation of lower leg muscles to prevent venous thrombosis. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies the Device as a Class II medical device, for which a prescription is required.

The Device features four therapeutic modes. Each mode sends varying degrees of electronic pulses and impulses, which stimulate the nerves or muscles in the treatment area. The stimulation is designed to be applied to the patient’s neck, shoulder, hand, lower back, knee or foot. The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) mode is used for non-narcotic pain management and is not useful in the absence of pain. The muscle stimulator modes are used to relieve muscle spasms or slow the progression of disuse atrophy. Petitioner states that none of the modes have sufficient voltage to build muscle, and that the science does not support the theory that electric muscle stimulators are effective in non-medical exercise.

Petitioner does not sell the Device to medical practitioners. Each medical practitioner who prescribes the Device for patients stores an inventory of the Devices, provided by the Petitioner, in their offices. The medical practitioners do not purchase the Devices and any unsold inventory of the Devices are returned to Petitioner if either the practitioner or Petitioner no longer desire to continue this arrangement. No money is exchanged between the Petitioner and the medical practitioners. When a medical practitioner prescribes the Device, they provide the patient’s insurance information to the Petitioner, which requests approval from the patient’s health insurance company. If the insurer approves payment, Petitioner authorizes the medical practitioner to dispense the Device directly to the patient. If the insurer declines payment, the patient does not receive the Device. The Petitioner receives payment for the product directly from the patient’s insurance provider.

The medical practitioners do not provide any services using the Device; they only instruct the patient in the use of the Device. Patients use the Devices at the location of their choice in accordance with the instruction manual and based on their medical practitioner’s specific instruction for each patient’s condition.

Analysis

All retail sales of tangible personal property are subject to sales tax pursuant to Tax Law § 1105(a), unless otherwise exempt. Tax Law § 1115(a)(3) exempts medical equipment and supplies from sales and compensating use tax, unless purchased at retail for use in performing medical and similar services for compensation. An exemption is strictly construed and the burden of proving non-taxability is on the person claiming the exemption. See 20 NYCRR 528.1(c).

Medical equipment is defined as machinery, apparatus, and other devices (other than prosthetic aids) that are intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of illnesses or diseases, or the correction or alleviation of physical incapacity in human beings. To qualify for this exemption, the equipment must be primarily and customarily used for medical purposes and not be generally useful in the absence of illness, injury or physical incapacity. See 20 NYCRR 528.4(e)(2).

Although the Department has previously opined in TSB-A-12(15)S that “[e]lectrical muscle stimulator units and EMS placement belts are useful for other than illness, injury or physical incapacity,” this Device is available only with a prescription for use in treating certain medical conditions and cannot be used to build muscle. Based on these facts, we conclude that the Device is used for the treatment of disease or physical incapacity in human beings, and is not useful in the absence of illness, injury or physical incapacity. In addition, because Petitioner is paid for the Device by the patients’ insurance provider, the Device is sold to the patients, and not to medical practitioners for use in providing medical services for compensation. Accordingly, the Device is exempt from sales tax.

DATED: August 1, 2024

Mary Ellen Ladouceur
Principal Attorney

Note: An Advisory Opinion is issued at the request of a person or entity. It is limited to the facts set forth therein and is binding on the Department only with respect to the person or entity to whom it is issued and only if the person or entity fully and accurately describes all relevant facts. An Advisory Opinion is based on the law, regulations, and Department policies in effect as of the date the Opinion is issued or for the specific time period at issue in the Opinion. The information provided in this document does not cover every situation and is not intended to replace the law or change its meaning.