Are a retired federal employee's periodic (non-lump-sum) Thrift Savings Plan distributions exempt from New York State income tax?

Short answer Yes. Distributions other than a lump sum from a federal Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) funded by the employee and the federal government qualify for the federal-employee pension subtraction under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii), so they may be subtracted from federal adjusted gross income in computing New York adjusted gross income, to the extent they are included in federal income.
State
NY
Ruling
TSB-A-24(14)I
Tax type
Income Tax
Issued
2024-04-24
Issued by
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Office of Counsel

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2024. Ask about yours and see what current New York tax law says, with citations.

Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A retired federal employee in the Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS) asked whether his Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) distributions — taken as periodic payments rather than a lump sum — can be subtracted from his New York income. His TSP was funded on a pre-tax basis by both himself and the federal government, with no rollovers in from outside accounts.

The Office of Counsel concluded yes. New York gives a subtraction for "pensions to officers and employees of the United States" (Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii)), and the regulation expressly covers federal-employee benefits "including, but not limited to, annuities, interest, and lump sum payments" (20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b)). For this petitioner's TSP, funded by him and the federal government with no transfers from other retirement accounts, the Department allowed the subtraction for the non-lump-sum distributions he asked about, to the extent included in federal adjusted gross income.

What this means for you

Retired federal employees in New York

The Department allowed the federal-pension subtraction for this retired federal employee's non-lump-sum TSP distributions, funded by his and the government's contributions. It did not decide lump-sum distributions or TSP accounts with transferred-in funds.

Accountants and tax preparers

The opinion addressed only this petitioner's non-lump-sum distributions from a TSP with no transfers from other retirement accounts. It does not analyze IRA rollovers or gains.

Common questions

Q: Does it matter that I take monthly payments instead of a lump sum?
A: This opinion decided only non-lump-sum distributions. The cited regulation mentions lump sums, but the Department did not decide a lump-sum payment on these facts.

Q: My TSP was funded by me and my federal agency. Does it still qualify?
A: Yes. Employee-plus-government-funded TSP distributions are covered.

Q: What if I roll the TSP into an IRA?
A: This opinion did not address IRA rollovers or later IRA earnings. The petitioner had made no transfers into his TSP.

Q: Can I rely on this opinion?
A: It binds the Department only as to the petitioner. Use it as guidance and confirm your own facts.

Citations and references

Statutes and regulations:

  • Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii); § 607
  • 20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b)

Source

Original ruling text

TSB-A-24(14)I
Income Tax
April 24, 2024

The Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for Advisory Opinion from [ REDACTED ] (“Petitioner”). Petitioner asks if distributions from Petitioner’s Federal Employees’ Retirement Thrift Savings Plan (“TSP”) attributable to contributions made by the Federal Government and Petitioner are allowed to be subtracted from federal adjusted gross income (“FAGI”) in determining New York adjusted gross income (“NYAGI”) under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) when Petitioner receives distributions, other than by a lump sum, from the TSP.

We conclude that Petitioner’s distributions, other than by a lump sum, from the TSP that were funded with contributions from Petitioner and the Federal Government qualify for the subtraction modification under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) to the extent the distributions are included in Petitioner’s FAGI.

Facts

Petitioner is a retired federal employee and member of the Federal Employees’ Retirement Service (FERS). FERS is a 3-part retirement package available to federal employees under which the employees are eligible after retirement for a basic annuity, Social Security, and distributions from the TSP. The TSP, established by 5 USC § 8437, is a retirement savings and investment plan and is treated for tax purposes as a trust under Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) § 401(a). The TSP is a defined contribution plan as defined in IRC § 414(i). Individual accounts are established for each participating employee. The account may include contributions made by the account owner, the account owner’s federal employer and the earnings associated with those contributions, as well as funds transferred to the TSP account from an account owner’s nongovernmental retirement account and its associated earnings. During Petitioner’s employment, he participated in the TSP. Contributions were made to Petitioner’s TSP account by Petitioner and by the Federal Government, Petitioner’s employer. Petitioner made all contributions on a pre-tax basis. Petitioner did not transfer any funds from another retirement account to the TSP account.

Analysis

Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) provides a subtraction modification for “pensions to officers and employees of the United States of America…or any agency or instrumentality of any one of the foregoing, to the extent includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes…. The term “pension” is not defined in Article 22 of the Tax Law. However, Tax Law § 607 provides that any term used in Article 22 shall have the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the laws of the United States relating to federal income taxes, unless a different meaning is clearly required. Payments paid from a qualified pension plan within the meaning of IRC § 401(a) would constitute a pension within the meaning of Tax Law § 612(c)(3) and (c)(3-a). See TSB-A-94(1)I and TSB-A-01(1)I.

Tax Regulation 20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b) provides that pensions and other retirement benefits (including, but not limited to, annuities, interest, and lump sum payments) paid to an employee of the United States, or any agency of the United States, that are included in FAGI, relate to services performed as a public employee, and all or a portion of which are actually contributed by the Federal government, shall be subtracted from FAGI in determining the NYAGI of a resident individual. Accordingly, any distributions to Petitioner from the TSP account relating to Petitioner’s employment with the Federal Government that were funded by contributions from Petitioner and the Federal Government are attributable to Petitioner’s employment with the Federal government and will qualify for the subtraction modification under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) to the extent those distribution are included in Petitioner’s FAGI.

Dated: April 24, 2024

Brian McCann
Principal Attorney

Note: An Advisory Opinion is issued at the request of a person or entity. It is limited to the facts set forth therein and is binding on the Department only with respect to the person or entity to whom it is issued and only if the person or entity fully and accurately describes all relevant facts. An Advisory Opinion is based on the law, regulations, and Department policies in effect as of the date the Opinion is issued or for the specific time period at issue in the Opinion. The information provided in this document does not cover every situation and is not intended to replace the law or change its meaning.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2024. Ezel checks current New York tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace