Is a lump-sum distribution from a federal employee's Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) exempt from New York income tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ask about yours and see what current New York tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A retired federal employee (U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons; a member of the Federal Employees' Retirement System) withdrew his entire Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) balance in a lump sum and asked whether it is exempt from New York income tax.
The Office of Counsel concluded that the lump sum, to the extent attributable to contributions made by the petitioner and his federal employer, is exempt under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) (pensions to U.S. officers and employees), as long as the amount is included in federal adjusted gross income (FAGI). The TSP is a defined-contribution plan treated as a trust under IRC § 401(a), so a payment from it counts as a "pension" for New York purposes (Tax Law § 607; 20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b)).
What this means for you
Retired federal employees
Your TSP money keeps a full New York exemption whether you take it as a lump sum, an annuity, or periodic payments - the form of payout doesn't matter. What matters is that the money is a federal-employee pension actually contributed by you and the federal government.
Accountants and tax preparers
Claim the § 612(c)(3)(ii) subtraction for the TSP-attributable amount included in FAGI. This is the federal-employee branch of the pension subtraction and is not capped at $20,000 (unlike the § 612(c)(3-a) subtraction for private pensions).
Common questions
Q: Does a lump sum get the same treatment as monthly payments? A: Yes. The regulation expressly covers annuities, interest, and lump-sum payments alike.
Q: Is the subtraction limited to $20,000?
A: No. Federal-employee pensions under § 612(c)(3)(ii) are fully subtracted; the $20,000 cap applies only to other private pensions under § 612(c)(3-a).
Q: Can I rely on this opinion?
A: It binds the Department only as to the petitioner. Use it as guidance and confirm your own facts.
Citations and references
Statutes and regulations:
- Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii); § 607
- 20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b)
- IRC § 401(a); 5 USC § 8437 (Thrift Savings Plan)
Source
- Landing page: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pubs_and_bulls/advisory_opinions/income_ao_2017.htm
- Opinion: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/advisory_opinions/income/a17_1i.pdf
Original ruling text
New York State Department of Taxation and Finance
TSB-A-17(1)I
Income Tax
March 1, 2017
Office of Counsel
STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION
PETITION NO I160302A
The Department of Taxation and Finance (“Department”) received a Petition for Advisory Opinion from REDACTED REDA (“Petitioner”). Petitioner asks whether a lump sum distribution from a Federal Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) account will be exempt from New York State income tax. We conclude that the lump sum distribution attributable to contributions made by Petitioner and his employer to his TSP account while he was a Federal employee will be exempt from New York State income tax if the amounts are included in Petitioner’s Federal adjusted gross income (FAGI). Facts Petitioner was employed by the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons from June of 1993 until June of 2015. Petitioner had a TSP account and was a member of the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS). Petitioner retired from employment at the age of 57 and has withdrawn his entire TSP balance in a lump sum payment. Analysis Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) provides a subtraction modification for “pensions to officers and employees of the United States of America…or any agency or instrumentality of any one of the foregoing, to the extent includible in gross income for federal income tax purposes.” The TSP, established by 5 USC § 8437, is a retirement savings and investment plan. As a defined contribution plan, the TSP offers the same types of savings and benefits to Federal employees that many private corporations offer their employees under IRC § 401(k) plans, and it is treated for tax purposes as a trust under IRC § 401(a). See 5 USC § 8440. The account may include contributions made by the account owner and the account owner’s Federal employer, as well as the earnings associated with those contributions. The term “pension” is not defined in Article 22 of the Tax Law. However, Tax Law § 607 provides that any term used in Article 22 shall have the same meaning as when used in a comparable context in the laws of the United States relating to federal income taxes, unless a different meaning is clearly required. Payments paid from a qualified pension plan within the meaning of IRC § 401 would constitute a “pension within the meaning of Tax Law §§ 612(c)(3)(ii) and 612(c)(3-a).” See TSB-A-94(1)(I) and TSB-A-01(1). Regulation 20 NYCRR 112.3(c)(1)(i)(b) provides that retirement benefits (including, but not limited, to annuities,
-2-
TSB-A-17(1)I
Income Tax
March 1, 2017
interest, and lump sum payments) that are included in FAGI related to services performed as public officers or public employees, all or a portion of which are actually contributed by the Federal government, shall be subtracted from FAGI in determining the New York adjusted gross income (NYAGI) of a resident individual. Accordingly, the lump sum distribution to Petitioner from his TSP account, which is attributable to Petitioner’s employment with the United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, or contributions to his TSP account made by his federal employer is considered part of Petitioner’s pension and qualifies for the subtraction modification under Tax Law § 612(c)(3)(ii) to the extent it is included in Petitioner’s FAGI. See TSB-A-94(I)I; TSB-A-15(6)I.
DATED: March 1, 2017
/S/
DEBORAH R. LIEBMAN
Deputy Counsel
NOTE:
An Advisory Opinion is issued at the request of a person or entity. It is limited to the facts set forth therein and is binding on the Department only with respect to the person or entity to whom it is issued and only if the person or entity fully and accurately describes all relevant facts. An Advisory Opinion is based on the law, regulations, and Department policies in effect as of the date the Opinion is issued or for the specific time period at issue in the Opinion. The information provided in this document does not cover every situation and is not intended to replace the law or change its meaning.
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 2017. Ezel checks current New York tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace