NY TSB-A-08(3)C Corporation Tax 2008-04-29

Is a foreign life insurance corporation with no New York premiums subject to New York tax because it holds a limited partnership interest with a basis over $1 million in a partnership doing business in New York?

Short answer: Yes, with an exception. A foreign life insurer with no New York premiums is subject to Article 33 tax because its limited-partner basis in a New York partnership exceeded $1 million (deeming it to participate in the business), unless the partnership is a portfolio investment partnership. Its section 1505 premiums limitation is zero, but it must still file annual returns.
Currency note: this ruling is from 2008
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked at the bottom of this page, or PDF in the sidebar) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Texas life insurance corporation had never written any New York business — no premiums allocable to New York since 1969. But to chase higher returns it invested $1.4 million as a less-than-1% limited partner in a partnership (a fund-of-hedge-funds) that does business in New York. It asked whether that investment alone subjects it to New York tax, and under which article (the insurance tax, Article 33, or the general business tax, Article 9-A).

The Department said yes, it is taxable under Article 33 (subject to one factual exception). New York's regulation (20 NYCRR § 1-3.2(a)(6)) treats a foreign corporation as doing business in New York if it is a limited partner of a partnership doing business here and is deemed to participate in the partnership's business. A limited partner is deemed to participate if it owns a 1% or more interest or holds an interest with a basis over $1 million — the two tests are independent. This insurer's basis was $1.4 million, so even though its percentage interest was under 1%, it crosses the basis threshold and is deemed to be doing business in New York.

The escape hatch: this does not apply if the partnership is a "portfolio investment partnership" — a partnership that meets the 90%-passive-income test of IRC § 851(b)(2). Whether the fund qualifies is a factual question the opinion couldn't resolve; if it does, the insurer is not taxed merely by reason of its ownership.

Because Article 33 governs insurance corporations (and § 209.4 keeps an Article-33 corporation out of Article 9-A), the insurer is taxed under Article 33's § 1501. But since it has no certificate of authority and no taxable premiums, the § 1505 premiums-based limitation computes to zero, and it owes no premiums tax under § 1510. It is still a "taxpayer" under § 1500(e) and must file annual returns under § 1515. (Note: a later modification, TSB-A-08(3.1)C, changed the section 1505 limitation analysis prospectively.)

What this means for you

Insurers and other foreign corporations investing in partnerships

A passive-looking minority stake can create New York nexus. The $1 million basis test is independent of the 1% interest test, so a small percentage interest with a large dollar basis can still pull you into New York tax. Track your basis under IRC § 705, including amounts attributed from affiliates and officers/directors.

Funds and their insurer investors

Whether the fund is a portfolio investment partnership (90% passive income under IRC § 851(b)(2)) is decisive. Insurer investors should get this determination in writing from the fund, because it can be the difference between New York taxability and none.

Accountants and tax professionals

Two layers: (1) nexus via 20 NYCRR § 1-3.2(a)(6) (basis-over-$1M or 1%-interest, unless portfolio investment partnership); and (2) the Article 33 mechanics — taxable under § 1501, but a zero § 1505 limitation and no § 1510 premiums where there is no certificate of authority and no New York premiums, with annual returns still required under § 1515. Read alongside the modification in TSB-A-08(3.1)C and the parallel TSB-A-09(2)C.

Common questions

Q: How can an insurer with no New York premiums owe New York tax?
A: Through its partnership investment. A foreign corporation that is a limited partner of a New York partnership and whose basis exceeds $1 million is deemed to be doing business in New York and is taxable under Article 33.

Q: What is the portfolio investment partnership exception?
A: If the partnership meets the 90%-passive-income test of IRC § 851(b)(2), the limited partner is not deemed to be doing business in New York by reason of the investment, and is not taxed on that basis.

Q: Does the insurer owe premiums tax?
A: No. With no certificate of authority and no New York premiums, the section 1505 limitation is zero and no section 1510 premiums tax applies — but it must still file annual returns as a taxpayer.

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and authorities:
- 20 NYCRR § 1-3.2(a)(6) (foreign corporation doing business as a limited partner; $1M basis test)
- Tax Law § 1501(a) (Article 33 franchise tax imposition); § 1500(e) (taxpayer)
- Tax Law § 209.4 (corporation taxable under Article 33 not taxed under Article 9-A)
- Tax Law § 1505 (premiums-based limitation); § 1510(b)(1) (premiums tax); § 1515 (returns)
- IRC § 851(b)(2) (portfolio investment partnership 90% passive-income test)

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Taxpayer Guidance Division
STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. C080122A

On January 22, 2008, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Service Life
and Casualty Insurance Company, P.O. Box 26800, Austin, Texas, 78755. Petitioner, Service
Life and Casualty Company, submitted additional information relating to the Petition on April 4,
2008.
The issue raised is whether Petitioner is subject to tax in New York State under Article 33
or Article 9-A of the Tax Law.
Petitioner submitted the following facts as the basis for this Advisory Opinion.
Petitioner is a life insurance corporation domiciled in the state of Texas that is not
licensed to do an insurance business in the state of New York and has never generated any
premiums allocable to New York since its incorporation on October 21, 1969.
Petitioner actively invests in a variety of investment vehicles such as stocks and bonds.
In order to achieve higher returns, Petitioner sought the advice of an equity investor for more
aggressive investments such as limited partnerships. Accordingly, Petitioner made an initial
investment of $1.4 million in a limited partnership (LP), on July 27, 2006. Petitioner plans to
make additional investments in the partnership in the future. Petitioner is a limited corporate
partner whose investment is less than 1% of the partnership and its only involvement in
partnership activities is the investment of funds and receipt of quarterly and annual data on its
operating results for financial and tax reporting purposes. Petitioner has no other authority to
direct or control the operations of the partnership.
LP is an investment-driven partnership investing in underlying hedge fund managers,
many of which operate in New York City. Most of the underlying hedge fund managers invest
in stocks and bonds and generate passive income in the form of dividends, interest, and capital
gains. However, some of the underlying hedge fund managers participate in lending and loan
origination activities that generate both New York State and New York City income. This
income is allocated to the funds and ultimately to the partners of these funds from the flow
through nature of the partnership investment.
LP is not a regulated investment company under section 851 of the Internal Revenue
Code or a dealer in securities within the meaning of section 1236 of the Internal Revenue Code.
The partnership derives more than 90% of its income from passive sources.

-2­
TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

Applicable law and regulations
Section 209.4 of Article 9-A of the Tax Law, provides, in part:
Corporations…taxable under articles thirty-two and thirty-three of this
chapter…shall not be subject to tax under this article.
Section 1500 of Article 33 of the Tax Law contains general definitions and provides, in
part:
(a) The term “insurance corporation” includes a corporation, association, joint
stock company or association, person, society, aggregation or partnership, by whatever
name known, doing an insurance business,…
*

*

*

(c) The term “foreign insurance corporation” means an insurance corporation
incorporated or organized under the laws of any other state of the United States, the
District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
*

*

*

(e) The term “taxpayer” means any insurance corporation subject to the tax
imposed under section fifteen hundred one, fifteen hundred two-a, or fifteen hundred ten
or any captive insurance company subject to the tax imposed under section fifteen
hundred two-b of this article.
Section 1501(a) of the Tax Law provides, in part:
Every domestic insurance corporation and every foreign or alien insurance
corporation, for the privilege of exercising its corporate franchise, or of doing business,
or of employing capital, or of owning or leasing property in this state in a corporate or
organized capacity, or of maintaining an office in this state…shall annually pay a
franchise tax which shall be computed as provided in section fifteen hundred two.
Section 1505 of the Tax Law, provides, in part:
(a)(2) Domestic, foreign and alien life insurance corporations. The provisions of
this paragraph shall apply to taxpayers subject to tax under paragraph one of subdivision
(b) of section fifteen hundred ten of this article. Notwithstanding the provisions of
sections fifteen hundred one and fifteen hundred ten of this article, the amount of taxes
imposed under such sections for taxable years beginning on or after January first nineteen
hundred seventy-seven…shall not exceed an amount computed as if such taxes were
determined solely under section fifteen hundred ten, except that for purposes of the

-3­
TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

limitation provided herein, the rate of tax under such section shall be deemed to be…two
percent for taxable years beginning on or after January first, nineteen hundred ninety­
eight.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of sections fifteen hundred one and fifteen
hundred ten of this article, in the case of taxpayers subject to tax under subdivision (b) of
section fifteen hundred ten, the total amount of tax imposed under this article… shall in
no event be less than the amount computed as if such tax was determined solely under
section fifteen hundred ten, except that the rate of tax under section fifteen hundred ten
shall be deemed to be one and five-tenths percent.
Section 1510(b)(1) of the Tax Law provides, in part:
Except as hereinafter provided, every domestic life insurance corporation, and
every foreign and alien life insurance corporation authorized to transact business in this
state under a certificate of authority from the superintendent of insurance, shall, for the
privilege of exercising corporate franchises or for carrying on business in a corporate or
organized capacity within this state, and in addition to any other taxes imposed for such
privilege, pay a tax on all gross direct premiums, less return premiums thereon, received
in cash or otherwise on risks resident in this state,…
Section 1515(a) of the Tax Law provides, in part:
Every taxpayer and every other foreign and alien insurance corporation having an
employee, including any officer, in this state or having an agent or representative in this
state, shall annually, on or before the fifteenth day of the third month following the close
of its taxable year, transmit to the [commissioner of taxation and finance] a return in a
form prescribed by [the commissioner] setting forth such information as the
[commissioner] may prescribe….
Section 1-3.2(a)(6) of the Business Corporation Franchise Tax Regulations (Regulations)
provides, in part:
(i) A foreign corporation is doing business, employing capital, owning or leasing
property or maintaining an office in New York State if it is a limited partner of a
partnership, other than a portfolio investment partnership, which is doing business,
employing capital, owning or leasing property or maintaining an office in New York
State and if it is engaged, directly or indirectly, in the participation in or the domination
or control of all or any portion of the business activities or affairs of the partnership. A
foreign corporation is engaged in such manner in the business activities or affairs of the
partnership if one or more of certain factual situations, including but not limited to the
following, exist during the taxable year or, except for clause (a) of this subparagraph, any
previous taxable year:

-4­
TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

(a) The foreign corporation has a one percent or more interest as a limited partner
in a partnership and/or the basis of the foreign corporation’s interest in the limited
partnership, determined pursuant to section 705 of the Internal Revenue Code, is more
than $1,000,000. For purposes of determining whether the level of interest in the
partnership or level of basis of the interest in the partnership is met, the percentage of
interest in the partnership and basis of interest in the partnership of members of the
foreign corporation’s affiliated group, of officers or directors of the foreign corporation
or of officers or directors of members of the foreign corporation’s affiliated group are
added to the foreign corporation’s interest in the partnership or the basis of its interest in
the partnership, respectively.
*

*

*

(iii) As used in this paragraph, the following terms shall have these meanings:
*

*

*

(d) The term portfolio investment partnership means a limited partnership which
meets the gross income requirement of section 851(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue
Code…The term portfolio investment partnership shall not include a dealer (within the
meaning of section 1236 of the Internal Revenue Code) in stocks or securities.
Section 851(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code provides:
(2) at least 90 percent of its gross income is derived from(A) dividends, interest, payments with respect to securities loans (as defined in
section 512(a)(5)), and gains from the sale or other disposition of stock or
securities (as defined in section 2(a)(36) of the Investment Company Act of
1940, as amended) or foreign currencies, or other income (including but not
limited to gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with
respect to its business of investing in such stock, securities or currencies, and
(B) net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership
(as defined in subsection (h));
Opinion
Section 1501(a) of Article 33 of the Tax Law imposes a franchise tax on every foreign
insurance corporation for the privilege of doing business, or of employing capital, or of owning
or leasing property in New York State in a corporate or organized capacity, or of maintaining an
office in New York State.

-5­
TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

The provisions in Article 33 of the Tax Law should be regarded as being in pari materia
and construed in a like manner as substantially identical provisions contained in Article 9-A of
the Tax Law. (Royal Indemnity Co. v NYS Tax App Trib, 75 NY2d 75; L1974, ch 649, §12.) For
purposes of Article 9-A of the Tax Law, section 1-3.2(a)(6) of the Regulations provides that a
foreign corporation is doing business, employing capital, owning or leasing property, or
maintaining an office in New York if it is a limited partner in a partnership, other than a portfolio
investment partnership, that is doing business, employing capital, owning or leasing property, or
maintaining an office in New York State and such foreign corporation is engaged directly or
indirectly in the participation in or the domination and control of the partnership’s business
activities. A portfolio investment partnership is a limited partnership that meets the gross
income requirement outlined in section 851(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. Whether LP is a
portfolio investment partnership as defined in section 1-3.2(a)(6)(iii) of the Regulations is a
factual matter that cannot be determined in the scope of this Advisory Opinion. However, if LP
is a portfolio investment partnership, Petitioner will not be deemed to be doing business in
New York, and will not be subject to tax, solely by reason of its ownership in LP.
If it is determined that LP is not a portfolio investment partnership within the meaning of
section 1-3.2(a)(6)(iii) of the Regulations, Petitioner’s ownership interest in the partnership must
be examined to determine whether Petitioner is engaged directly or indirectly in the participation
in or the domination and control of the partnership’s business activities. Section 1-3.2(a)(6)(i)(a)
of the Regulations provides that a foreign corporation that owns a limited partnership interest of
1% or more, or that has an interest with a basis of more than $1 million at any time during a
taxable year, is engaged in the participation in or the domination and control of the partnership’s
activities.
Petitioner is a limited corporate partner in LP, a partnership that is conducting business in
New York State. Petitioner’s ownership interest in LP is less than 1% of the partnership and its
only involvement in partnership activities is the investment of funds and receipt of quarterly and
annual data on its operating results for financial and tax reporting purposes. However,
Petitioner’s basis in LP at the time of the initial investment in 2006 was $1.4 million. Therefore,
pursuant to section 1-3.2(a)(6) of the Regulations, Petitioner is deemed to be engaged in the
participation in or domination and control of the partnership during 2006 and any subsequent tax
year in which Petitioner’s ownership interest or basis in the partnership meets either the
ownership interest or basis threshold established in section 1-3.2(a)(6) of the Regulations.
In Bankers Life and Casualty Company, Adv Op Comm T & F, April 1, 2004,
TSB-A-04(2)C, it was held that the petitioner was doing business, employing capital, owning or
leasing property, or maintaining an office in New York through its ownership interests in
partnerships and LLCs conducting business activities in New York. As in Bankers Life, supra,
Petitioner will be deemed to be doing business, employing capital, owning or leasing property, or
maintaining an office in New York State for purposes of Article 9-A through its ownership
interest in LP, provided that LP is not a portfolio investment partnership. Activity that
constitutes doing business, employing capital, owning or leasing property, or maintaining
an office in New York for purposes of Article 9-A would also constitute such activities for

-6­
TSB-A-08(3)C
Corporation Tax
April 29, 2008

section 1501 of the Tax Law. Since Petitioner is a life insurance corporation that will be doing
business, employing capital, owning or leasing property, or maintaining an office in New York
State, it will be subject to tax under Article 33 of the Tax Law. See Royal Indemnity, supra.
Section 209.4 of Article 9-A of the Tax Law provides that a corporation that is taxable
under Article 33 of the Tax Law is not subject to tax under Article 9-A of the Tax Law.
In Pacific Life Insurance Company, Adv Op Comm T&F, November 10, 1999,
TSB-A-99(28)C, the petitioner had orphan premiums from New York residents and income
through its direct and indirect ownership interests in various general and limited partnerships and
LLCs that conducted business activities in New York but did not have a certificate of authority
from the Superintendent of Insurance to conduct an insurance business in New York. It was held
that the petitioner’s activities in New York through the partnerships and LLCs would constitute
doing business and would subject the petitioner to the tax imposed under section 1501 of the Tax
Law. However, since the petitioner did not have a certificate of authority from the
Superintendent of Insurance to conduct an insurance business in New York, the petitioner did not
have taxable premiums under section 1510 of the Tax Law.
As in Pacific Life, supra, Petitioner will be subject to tax under section 1501 of Article 33
of the Tax Law, provided that LP is not a portfolio investment partnership. However, since
Petitioner does not have a certificate of authority from the Superintendent of Insurance to
conduct an insurance business in New York, Petitioner will not have taxable premiums under
section 1510 of Article 33. Section 1505 of Article 33 of the Tax Law requires life insurance
corporations to compute a limitation on the amount of tax imposed based on taxable premiums.
Since Petitioner does not have taxable premiums, the limitation computed under section 1505 of
Article 33 is zero. However, Petitioner will be a taxpayer under section 1500(e) of Article 33,
and pursuant to section 1515 of Article 33, will be required to file annual returns.

DATED: April 29, 2008

NOTE:

/s/
Jonathan Pessen
Tax Regulations Specialist IV
Taxpayer Guidance Division

An Advisory Opinion is issued at the request of a person or entity. It is
limited to the facts set forth therein and is binding on the Department only
with respect to the person or entity to whom it is issued and only if the
person or entity fully and accurately describes all relevant facts. An
Advisory Opinion is based on the law, regulations, and Department
policies in effect as of the date the Opinion is issued or for the specific
time period at issue in the Opinion.