May a corporate member of an LLC taxed as a partnership claim the investment tax credit (or empire-zone ITC) on the LLC's property, and qualify as a new business eligible for a refund?

Plain-English summary

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP asked, for a planned new corporation ("NewCo") that will be a member of an LLC classified as a partnership, (1) whether NewCo may treat the LLC's property as its own qualifying property for the investment tax credit (ITC) under section 210.12 and the empire-zone ITC (EZ-ITC) under section 210.12-B, and (2) whether NewCo qualifies as a new business entitled to a refund of those credits. Parent will organize NewCo in Year 1; the LLC will begin doing business in New York in Year 1 and will place qualifying manufacturing property in service by Year 5. The only prior connection -- a former subsidiary's 4% limited-partnership interest in a foreign oriented-strandboard venture -- is no longer held.

The Department held:

• Credit on LLC property: Just as a corporate partner of a partnership may claim an ITC on qualifying property principally used by the partnership (20 NYCRR 3-13.2), a corporate member of an LLC treated as a partnership may claim the ITC or EZ-ITC on its allocable share of the cost of the LLC's qualifying property.
• New business: NewCo qualifies as a new business under section 210.12(j) -- it is not substantially similar in operation/ownership to a business previously conducted by the corporate group; the former 4% LP interest does not disqualify it.
• No double credit, but refundable: NewCo may not claim both the ITC and the EZ-ITC on the same property. If it claims the ITC, as a new business it may claim a refund under section 210.12(e); if it claims the EZ-ITC, as a new business it may claim a partial refund under section 210.12-B(d), for property placed in service by Year 5.

What this means for you

A corporate LLC member is treated like a corporate partner for the ITC

When an LLC is taxed as a partnership, its corporate members can claim the ITC (and the empire-zone ITC) on their allocable share of the LLC's qualifying property -- the credit flows through to the members, who use the property "by" the LLC.

"New business" status unlocks a cash refund

A corporation that qualifies as a new business under section 210.12(j) can convert a non-refundable credit into cash: a full refund of the ITC (section 210.12(e)) or a partial refund of the EZ-ITC (section 210.12-B(d)). The new-business test turns on whether the group previously ran a substantially similar business -- a small, dropped minority interest did not taint NewCo here.

Pick one credit per property

The same property cannot generate both the ITC and the EZ-ITC. Model which credit (and which refund mechanism) is more valuable before claiming.

Common questions

Q: Can a corporate member of an LLC claim the investment tax credit on the LLC's property?
A: Yes. If the LLC is taxed as a partnership, the corporate member may claim the ITC or EZ-ITC on its allocable share of the LLC's qualifying property, like a corporate partner.

Q: Does NewCo qualify as a new business?
A: Yes, under section 210.12(j). A former subsidiary's dropped 4% limited-partnership interest did not make it substantially similar to a prior group business.

Q: Can NewCo claim both the ITC and the EZ-ITC?
A: No. It must choose. As a new business it may then claim a refund of the ITC (210.12(e)) or a partial refund of the EZ-ITC (210.12-B(d)).

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and authorities:
- Tax Law section 210.12 (investment tax credit)
- Tax Law section 210.12(e) (refund of ITC for a new business)
- Tax Law section 210.12(j) (new business definition)
- Tax Law section 210.12-B (empire zone investment tax credit)
- Tax Law section 210.12-B(d) (partial refund of EZ-ITC for a new business)
- Tax Law section 1086 (refunds)
- 20 NYCRR 3-13.2 (corporate partner; ITC on partnership property)
- Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, TSB-A-01(1)C (Jan. 9, 2001)

Source

• Landing page: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pubs_and_bulls/advisory_opinions/corporation_ao_2001.htm
• Opinion: https://www.tax.ny.gov/pdf/advisory_opinions/corporation/a01_1c.pdf

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Technical Services Division

TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. C000626A

On June 26, 2000, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Sutherland Asbill &
Brennan LLP, 999 Peachtree Street, NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3996.
The issues raised by Petitioner, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, are:
1. Whether a corporate member of a limited liability company (“LLC”) will
be able to claim its allocable share of the cost or other basis of tangible personal
property for purposes of the investment tax credit (“ITC”), pursuant to section
210.12(a) of the Tax Law, and for purposes of the empire zone investment tax credit
(“EZ-ITC”), pursuant to section 210.12-B of the Tax Law, where the LLC, which is
classified as a partnership for federal income tax and New York franchise tax
purposes, purchases and uses the tangible personal property that qualifies for the
credits.
2. Whether such corporate member of the LLC qualifies as a new business
pursuant to section 210.12(j) of the Tax Law, and is therefore eligible to claim a
refund of the ITC, pursuant to sections 210.12(e) of the Tax Law, and the EZ-ITC,
pursuant to section 210.12-B(d) of the Tax Law.
Petitioner submits the following facts as the basis for this Advisory Opinion.
Organizational Structure
Parent is a publicly-traded corporation that wholly owns three subsidiaries, and is the ultimate
parent company of numerous other subsidiaries. Parent’s stock is widely-held, and no shareholder
owns or controls, directly or indirectly, more than 10 percent of its outstanding stock. Parent and
all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries that are members of its affiliated group for federal income
tax purposes will be referred to collectively as the Corporate Group.
Parent has three first-tier subsidiaries: Subsidiary A, Subsidiary B, and Subsidiary C.
Subsidiary C is a holding company that owns Subsidiary G, an operating paperboard and packaging
company, which also owns numerous subsidiaries. From 1959 through 1971, Subsidiary G operated
(either directly or through a subsidiary) a sheet plant in New York State. That facility printed and
folded corrugated paper used in the production of packaging materials. That operation was
discontinued in 1971, and the New York location is now used to warehouse inventory.

-2­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001

Subsidiary A is an operating forest products company and owns numerous subsidiaries
engaged in various aspects of the forest products business. Subsidiary A at one time owned
Subsidiary D, which held an interest in a limited partnership that operated an oriented strandboard
plant in a foreign country. Subsidiary D has since been acquired by an unrelated forest products
company.
Subsidiary A also wholly owns Subsidiary E, a holding company that owns several financial
services companies. Subsidiary E (through another holding company subsidiary, Subsidiary H) and
Subsidiary B, a direct holding company subsidiary of Parent, together own 100 percent of Subsidiary
F, a federal savings bank. Subsidiary F owns, directly and indirectly, numerous financial services
subsidiaries, including Subsidiary J and Subsidiary K, which are both engaged in the mortgage
lending business.
Proposed Transaction
Parent plans to organize a new corporation, NewCo, to invest in a LLC. NewCo will be
organized in Year 1. LLC will begin doing business in New York in Year 1, and NewCo will obtain
its membership interest in LLC in Year 1.
NewCo will have a 50 percent or less membership interest in LLC. The remaining
membership interests will be held by individuals or entities that are not related to Parent, NewCo,
or any other member of the Corporate Group. LLC will be classified as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes and for New York franchise tax purposes.
LLC will build, own, and operate an oriented strandboard plant in Town A, which is
designated as an empire zone in New York State. LLC will enter a long-term distribution agreement
with Subsidiary A, whereby Subsidiary A will commit to sell to others, or purchase for its own
account, all of the oriented strandboard produced by the LLC at market prices.
Oriented strandboard (“OSB”) is a structural panel which is used primarily in residential
construction as a substitute for softwood plywood. OSB is manufactured by reducing logs to wood
flakes approximately the size of business cards, drying the flakes, applying a small amount of
waterproof resin, pressing the resinated flakes together into large sheets and then trimming the large
sheets into 4 by 8 foot panels. OSB is produced from wood that is less costly, from more available
wood species, and of more variable dimensions than the wood used in producing plywood.
The Corporate Group’s Businesses and Operations
Subsidiary A and its subsidiaries manufacture and distribute lumber, plywood, hardboard,
gypsum wallboard, particleboard, medium density fiberboard, and other building products in many
states. Subsidiary G and its subsidiaries manufacture and distribute paper and packaging materials
in many states. Subsidiary E’s subsidiaries, Subsidiary F, and Subsidiary F’s subsidiaries provide

-3­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001

financial services in several states. Subsidiary F’s indirect subsidiaries, Subsidiary J and Subsidiary
K engage in the mortgage lending business in New York State and other states. However, no
member of the Corporate Group owns or operates, or (with the exception of the sheet plant operated
by Subsidiary G from 1959 through 1971) has owned or operated, any manufacturing facility in
New York State either directly or indirectly. Furthermore, no member of the Corporate Group is
organized in New York.
The Corporate Group currently does not own or operate an OSB plant. At one time
Subsidiary A owned an operating OSB plant outside of New York State. It purchased the plant in
1984, and the plant closed in 1988. Additionally, as mentioned above, Subsidiary A owned
Subsidiary D, which held a 4 percent limited partnership interest in a foreign limited partnership that
operated an OSB plant in a foreign country. Subsidiary D was later acquired by an unrelated forest
products company. Other than the plant Subsidiary A operated from 1984 to 1988 and the small
limited partnership interest owned by former Subsidiary D at one time, no member of the Corporate
Group owns or operates or has owned or operated an OSB plant either directly or indirectly.
The only members of the Corporate Group that file franchise tax returns in New York State
are Subsidiary A, Subsidiary G, Subsidiary J and Subsidiary K. As mentioned above, Subsidiary A
and Subsidiary G both maintain some inventory in New York State. Neither Subsidiary A nor
Subsidiary G has ever owned or operated any manufacturing facility in New York. Subsidiary G did
operate a sheet plant that printed and folded corrugated paper used in the production of packaging
materials. Subsidiary J and Subsidiary K engage in the mortgage lending business in New York and
other states. Neither has ever operated any manufacturing facility in New York or any other state.
Parent is authorized to do business in New York State but has filed Form CT-245
(Maintenance Fee and Activities Return for a Foreign Corporation Disclaiming Tax Liability) for
at least the last 10 years. Parent does not have any office of other place of business in New York.
It does not own or lease any property, maintain inventory, or employ any other assets in New York.
Parent does not perform any services in New York and does not participate in any partnership,
limited liability company, or joint venture doing business in New York. Parent does not employ any
persons in New York, and other than occasional meetings with stock analysts in New York, none
of Parent’s officers or employees perform activities for Parent or any other member of the Corporate
Group in New York.
Other Representations
Town A has been designated as an empire zone pursuant to Article 18-B of the General
Municipal Law, and the LLC has received a certification pursuant to Article 18-B of the General
Municipal Law as a business enterprise eligible for benefits.
The tangible personal property and other tangible property, including buildings and structural
components of buildings, that the LLC will place in service relating to the OSB plant, will have a

-4­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001

situs in an empire zone in New York State designated as such pursuant to Article 18-B of the
General Municipal Law, will be depreciable pursuant to section 167 of the Internal Revenue Code
(IRC), will have a useful life of four years or more, will be acquired by purchase as defined in section
179(d) of the IRC and will be principally used by the LLC in the production of goods by
manufacturing. Such property will be placed in service no later than Year 5 of the LLC’s existence.
Discussion
Section 209.1 of Article 9-A of the Tax Law imposes the business corporation franchise tax
on every corporation, unless specifically exempt, for the privilege of exercising its franchise, or of
doing business, or of employing capital, or of owning or leasing property in New York State in a
corporate or organized capacity, or of maintaining an office in New York State.
An LLC that is treated as a corporation for federal income tax purposes is treated as a
corporation for New York State tax purposes. An LLC that is treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes, is treated as a partnership for New York State tax purposes. (See, FGIC
CMRC Corp, Adv Op Comm T & F, April 1, 1996, TSB-A-96(11)C; and Department of Taxation
and Finance Memorandum, TSB-M-94(6)I and (8)C, October 25, 1994.)
Section 3-13.2 of the Business Corporation Franchise Tax Regulations (“Article 9-A
Regulations”) provides that each partnership item of income, capital, gain, loss or deduction has the
same source and character in the hands of a partner for Article 9-A purposes as it has in its hands for
federal income tax purposes. Where an item is not characterized for federal income tax purposes
or is not required to be taken into account for federal income tax purposes, the source and character
of the item shall be determined as if such item were realized by the partner directly from the source
from which realized by the partnership, or incurred by the partner in the same manner as incurred
by the partnership.
Section 210.12 of the Tax Law allows an ITC against the tax imposed under Article 9-A of
the Tax Law. For taxable years beginning after 1990, section 210.12 allows an ITC equal to five
percent with respect to the first $350 million of the investment credit base and four percent with
respect to the investment credit base in excess of $350 million. The investment credit base is the
cost or other basis for federal income tax purposes of qualified tangible personal property and other
tangible property, including buildings and structural components of buildings.
Under section 210.12(b) of the Tax Law and section 5-2.2 of the Article 9-A Regulations,
the term “qualified property” means tangible personal property and other tangible property, including
buildings and structural components of buildings, which:
(1) is acquired, constructed, reconstructed or erected by the taxpayer after
December 31, 1968;

-5­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001

(2) is depreciable pursuant to section 167 of the IRC;
(3) has a useful life of four years or more;
(4) is acquired by the taxpayer by purchase as defined in section 179(d) of the
IRC;
(5) has a situs in New York State;
(6) and is principally used by the taxpayer in the production of goods by
manufacturing, processing, assembling, refining, mining, extracting, farming,
agriculture, horticulture, floriculture, viticulture or commercial fishing.
In John J. Eagan, Norris, McLaughlin & Marcus, Adv Op St Tax Comm, April 29, 1987,
TSB-A-87(9)C, it was held that where a partnership purchases tangible personal property that is
principally used by the partnership and that meets all of the requirements for qualifying for the ITC,
a corporate partner of the partnership is allowed an ITC, pursuant to section 210.12(a) of the Tax
Law, for its allocable share of the cost or other basis of such qualifying tangible personal property.
In Bruce Nadell, Adv Op Comm T&F, May 2, 1996, TSB-A-96(12)C, it was held where a corporate
partner of a partnership is allowed to claim an ITC on qualifying property that is principally used by
the partnership, a corporate member of an LLC that is treated as a partnership is allowed to claim
an ITC on qualifying property that is principally used by the LLC.
Section 5-2.1 of the Article 9-A Regulations provides that the taxpayer must claim the ITC
for the first taxable year in which the property becomes qualified property.
Section 210.12(e) of the Tax Law, provides, in part, that:
if the amount of credit allowable under this subdivision for any taxable year
reduces the tax to [the higher of the amounts prescribed in section 210.1(c) and (d)
of the Tax Law] ... any amount of credit allowed for a taxable year commencing on
or after to [January 1, 1987] and not deductible in such taxable year may be carried
over to the fifteen taxable years next following such taxable year and may be
deducted from the taxpayer's tax for such year or years. In lieu of such carryover, any
such taxpayer which qualifies as a new business under [section 210.12(j) of the Tax
Law] may elect to treat the amount of such carryover as an overpayment of tax to be
credited or refunded in accordance with the provisions of [section 1086 of the Tax
Law] ....
Section 210.12-B(a) of the Tax Law provides that a taxpayer shall be allowed an EZ-ITC
against the tax imposed by Article 9-A of the Tax Law if the taxpayer has been certified pursuant
to Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law. The amount of the credit shall be 10 percent of the

-6­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001
cost or other basis for federal income tax purposes of tangible personal property and other tangible
property, including buildings and structural components of buildings, described in section
210.12-B(b), which is located within an empire zone designated as such pursuant to Article 18-B of
the General Municipal Law, but only if the acquisition, construction, reconstruction or erection of
such property occurred or was commenced on or after the date of such designation and prior to the
expiration thereof. Section 210.12-B(b) of the Tax Law contains the conditions that must be met for
tangible property to qualify for the EZ-ITC.
Section 210.12-B(e) of the Tax Law provides that property which qualifies for the ITC
provided under section 210.12 of the Tax Law may be treated as property principally used by the
taxpayer in the production of goods by manufacturing, processing, assembling, refining, mining,
extracting, farming, agriculture, horticulture, viticulture or commercial fishing, provided the property
otherwise qualifies under section 210.12-B(b) of the Tax Law, in which event a credit shall not be
allowed under section 210.12 of the Tax Law.
Section 5-10.1(b) of the Article 9-A Regulations provides that in order to claim a EZ-ITC,
a taxpayer must be certified pursuant to Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law during the
taxable year, or have applied for such certification on or before the last day of the taxable year, in
which the property for which the EZ-ITC is claimed becomes qualified property.
Following John Eagan, supra, and Bruce Nadell, supra, where an LLC that is treated as a
partnership has been certified pursuant to Article 18-B of the General Municipal Law, and it
purchases tangible property that is principally used by the LLC and that meets all of the requirements
under section 210.12-B of the Tax Law for qualifying for the EZ-ITC, a corporate member of the
LLC is allowed an EZ-ITC, pursuant to such section 210.12-B, for its allocable share of the cost or
other basis of such qualifying tangible property. Where the corporate member of the LLC claims
the EZ-ITC under section 210.12-B of the Tax Law, pursuant to section 210.12-B(e) of the Tax Law
it may not claim an ITC under section 210.12 of the Tax Law.
Section 210.12-B(d) of the Tax Law provides that the EZ-ITC allowed for any taxable year
shall not reduce the tax due for such year to less than the higher of the amounts prescribed in section
210.1(c) and (d) of the Tax Law. However, if the amount of the EZ-ITC allowed for any taxable year
reduces the tax to such amount, any amount of EZ-ITC not deductible in such taxable year may be
carried over to the following year or years and may be deducted from the taxpayer's tax for such year
or years. In lieu of such carryover, any such taxpayer which qualifies as a new business under
section 210.12(j) of the Tax Law may elect, on its report for its taxable year with respect to which
the EZ-ITC is allowed, to treat 50 percent of the amount of such carryover as an overpayment of tax
to be credited or refunded in accordance with the provisions of section 1086 of the Tax Law.
Section 210.12(j) of the Tax Law defines a "new business" as any corporation except:
1. a corporation in which over 50 percent of the number of shares of stock
entitling their holders to vote for the election of directors or trustees is owned or

-7­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001
controlled, either directly or indirectly, by a taxpayer subject to tax under Article 9-A;
section 183, 184, 185 or 186 of Article 9; Article 32 or 33 of the Tax Law; or
2. a corporation that is substantially similar in operation and in ownership to
a business entity or entities taxable, or previously taxable under Article 9-A; section
183, 184, 185, or 186 of Article 9; Article 32 or 33; or Article 23 or that would have
been subject to tax under Article 23, as such article was in effect on January 1, 1980,
or the income (or losses) of which is (or was) includable under Article 22 of the Tax
Law whereby the intent and purpose of sections 210.12(e) or 210.12B(d) of the Tax
Law with respect to refunding of credit to new business would be evaded; or
3. a corporation that has been subject to tax under Article 9-A for more than
four years (excluding short periods) before each tax year during which the taxpayer
becomes eligible for the ITC or EZ-ITC (that is, the year for which the credit is
allowed).
Chapter 103 of the Laws of 1981, created the refundable ITC at issue. A review of the
legislative history discloses that this law was intended to accomplish the following: "It expands and
enriches various investment incentives to assure continued economic growth in the State"
(Memorandum In Support, Governor's Bill Jacket, L 1981, ch 103). The Budget Report
Memorandum (Governor's Bill Jacket, L 1981, ch 103) noted the following "brief recapitulation" of
the sessions law: "To encourage business investments in New York State by liberalizing and
increasing certain investment incentives and credits under the corporate franchise and personal
income taxes." (See also, International Imaging Materials, Inc, Dec Tax App Trib, TSB-D-95(4)C,
June 8, 1995.)
The settled purpose of the statute at issue was to encourage business investments in New
York State. An expansive interpretation of "substantially similar operations", without regard to
whether such substantially similar operations were conducted by a company related to the taxpayer
in New York, would defeat such purpose. (cf., Symphony Space v Tishelman, 60 NY2d 33;
Brooklyn Union Gas v Commr of Dept of Fin., 108 AD2d 74, revd on other grounds 67 NY2d 1036).
Therefore, in order to give effect to the Legislature's purpose, the statute should be interpreted so that
a refundable ITC would not be disallowed to a taxpayer related to a corporation that had conducted
substantially similar operations outside of New York State. See Scepter, Inc., Adv Op, Comm T&F,
April 7, 1999, TSB-A-99(18)C.

-8­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001
Conclusion
In this case, Petitioner states that the LLC’s tangible personal property and other tangible
property, including buildings and structural components of buildings relating to the OSB plant that
the LLC places in service will be property that will qualify for the ITC under section 210.12 of the
Tax Law and EZ-ITC under section 210.12-B of the Tax Law. Therefore, NewCo, as a corporate
member of the LLC, may claim either the ITC or the EZ-ITC for its allocable share of the cost or
other basis for the qualifying tangible property used by the LLC. However, pursuant to section
210.12-B(e) of the Tax Law, NewCo can not claim both the ITC and the EZ-ITC. Therefore, NewCo
will be allowed the ITC under section 210.12 of the Tax Law, unless it elects to claim the EZ-ITC
pursuant to section 210.12-B(e) of the Tax Law.
In either event, NewCo will meet the conditions of section 210.12(j) of the Tax Law to be
treated as a new business for the following reasons.
1. NewCo is not a corporation owned or controlled, either directly or indirectly by a taxpayer
subject to tax under Article 9, 9-A, 32 or 33 of the Tax Law. Parent is not a taxpayer.
2. NewCo will be similar in ownership to a business entity taxable under Article 9-A. Parent
directly owns Subsidiary A, a taxpayer under Article 9-A. Parent also indirectly owns Subsidiary
G, a taxpayer under Article 9-A and Subsidiary J and Subsidiary K, taxpayers under either Article
9-A or 32. However, based on legislative history and Scepter Inc, supra, it is determined that
NewCo will not be similar in operation to these entities. Subsidiary A’s activities in New York State
currently consist of warehousing inventory in New York. In the past, Subsidiary A’s activities
included the operation of an OSB plant outside of New York, and indirectly holding an interest in
a limited partnership that operated an OSB plant in a foreign country. Subsidiary G’s activities in
New York State currently consist of warehousing inventory in New York, and in the past, included
the operation of a sheet plant. Subsidiary J and Subsidiary K activities in New York involve the
mortgage lending business. NewCo’s principal business activity is operating an OSB plant in New
York. While Subsidiary A’s former activities of operating an OSB plant are similar to NewCo’s
activities, such activities by Subsidiary A were not conducted in New York State. None of the
activities of the other entities involve the operation of an OSB plant.
3. NewCo began doing business in New York State in Year 1, when the LLC began business.
The LLC will put the qualifying property into service no later than Year 5 of the LLC’s existence.
Therefore, Petitioner will not be a corporation that is subject to tax under Article 9-A for more than
four years prior to the year during which NewCo first becomes eligible for the investment tax credit.

-9­
TSB-A-01(1)C
Corporation Tax
January 9, 2001
Accordingly, NewCo may not claim both the ITC and the EZ-ITC. If NewCo claims the ITC
under section 210.12 of the Tax Law, on qualifying property of the LLC placed in service no later
than Year 5, NewCo will be a new business and may claim a refund of such ITC pursuant to section
210.12(e) of the Tax Law. However, if NewCo claims the EZ-ITC under section 210.12-B of the
Tax Law, on qualifying property of the LLC placed in service no later than Year 5 of the LLC’s
existence, NewCo will be a new business and may claim a partial refund of such EZ-ITC pursuant
to section 210.12-B(d) of the Tax Law.

DATED: January 9, 2001

NOTE:

/s/
Jonathan Pessen
Tax Regulations Specialist III
Technical Services Division

The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions are
limited to the facts set forth therein.