NY TSB-A-01(16)C Corporation Tax 2001-04-17

Do a provider's sales of telecommunication services to a foreign carrier that resells them qualify for the section 186-e sale-for-resale exclusion?

Short answer: Yes, if the buyer qualifies as a carrier and resells the service as telecommunications. Under section 186-e.2(b)(1), sales of telecommunication services for resale are excluded from the excise tax where the purchaser is an interexchange or local carrier and resells the purchased service as telecommunication services. A foreign reseller (Telco X) that is not formally labeled a carrier in its home country still qualifies if its activities there, if conducted in New York, would constitute the activities of an interexchange or local carrier, and it resells the service as such.

Disclaimer: This is an official New York State Department of Taxation and Finance Advisory Opinion (TSB-A), issued by the Office of Counsel at a taxpayer's request. It is limited to the facts set forth in it and binds the Department only with respect to the petitioner to whom it was issued, and only if that petitioner fully and accurately described all relevant facts; another taxpayer cannot rely on it. It reflects the law, regulations, and Department policy in effect when issued and may since have changed. Taxpayer-identifying details are redacted. New York State and local sales taxes are administered centrally by the Department. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed New York tax professional about your specific situation.

About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked at the bottom of this page, or PDF in the sidebar) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Arthur Andersen LLP asked whether Telco Y's sales of telecommunication services to Telco X -- a foreign carrier -- qualify for the sale-for-resale exclusion from the section 186-e excise tax. Telco X's home country does not formally label providers as "interexchange carrier" or "local carrier," but Telco X is a common carrier there and resells the services to its customers.

The Department held the sales qualify for the exclusion if Telco X is treated as a carrier:

Section 186-e.2(a) imposes an excise tax on the sale of telecommunication services by a provider; section 186-e.2(b)(1) excludes certain sales for resale.
To qualify, the purchaser must (a) resell the purchased telecommunication services as telecommunication services, and (b) be an interexchange carrier or local carrier (section 186-e.1(b)(1)-(2)); a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the PSC is acceptable evidence (TSB-M-95(3)C).
Because Telco X operates abroad, the test is functional: if Telco X can show its activities in its home country, if conducted in New York, would constitute the activities of an interexchange carrier or local carrier, it is treated as such for section 186-e.
Conclusion: Telco Y's sales to Telco X qualify for the section 186-e.2(b)(1) exclusion if Telco X is so treated and resells the services as telecommunication services.

What this means for you

The resale exclusion turns on the buyer being a carrier and reselling as telecom

Section 186-e.2(b)(1) excludes wholesale telecom only when the purchaser is a carrier (interexchange or local) and resells the purchased service as telecommunication services. Both prongs must be met.

Foreign carriers are judged functionally, not by foreign labels

A buyer abroad that is not formally called an "interexchange" or "local carrier" can still qualify if its activities, performed in New York, would be carrier activities. The substance of what it does -- not its home-country title -- controls. (Compare the later TSB-A-02(17)C/Primus, applying the same "would be carrier activities if done in New York" test.)

Keep documentation of carrier status

Providers should retain evidence -- a PSC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, or, for a foreign buyer, a demonstration of carrier-type activities -- to support claiming the resale exclusion.

Common questions

Q: Are wholesale telecom sales always exempt from the section 186-e tax?
A: No. The resale exclusion applies only when the purchaser is an interexchange or local carrier and resells the service as telecommunication services.

Q: Can a foreign carrier qualify the seller for the resale exclusion?
A: Yes, if the foreign buyer's activities, if conducted in New York, would constitute interexchange- or local-carrier activities, and it resells the services as telecom.

Q: What evidence shows the buyer is a carrier?
A: A PSC Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity is acceptable; a foreign buyer must demonstrate carrier-type activities.

Citations and references

Statutes, regulations, and authorities:
- Tax Law section 186-e.1(b)(1) (interexchange carrier; common carrier)
- Tax Law section 186-e.1(b)(2) (local carrier)
- Tax Law section 186-e.1(e) (provider of telecommunication services)
- Tax Law section 186-e.1(g) (telecommunication services)
- Tax Law section 186-e.2(a) (excise tax on sale of telecommunication services)
- Tax Law section 186-e.2(b)(1) (sale-for-resale exclusion)
- TSB-M-95(3)C (Dec. 13, 1995)
- Arthur Andersen LLP, TSB-A-01(16)C (Apr. 17, 2001)

Source

Original ruling text

New York State Department of Taxation and Finance

Office of Tax Policy Analysis
Technical Services Division

TSB-A-01(16)C
Corporation Tax
April 17, 2001

STATE OF NEW YORK
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION AND FINANCE
ADVISORY OPINION

PETITION NO. C000927C

On September 27, 2000, a Petition for Advisory Opinion was received from Arthur Andersen
LLP, Attn: Ronald J. Rabkin, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, 10105.
The issue raised by Petitioner, Arthur Andersen LLP, is whether sales to a foreign
interexchange carrier or local carrier qualify as sales for resale that are exempt from the gross
receipts tax imposed under section 186-e of the Tax Law.
Petitioner submits the following facts as the basis for this Advisory Opinion.
Foreign Telco X is incorporated under the laws of a foreign country and operates exclusively
outside of the United States. Telco X is a provider of international and domestic telecommunication
services in its home country. Telco X is not subject to regulation by the New York State Public
Service Commission (PSC), and therefore, does not hold a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity. Telco X does not hold a license from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Domestic Telco Y is a wholly owned subsidiary of Telco X. Telco Y is incorporated under
the laws of Delaware, and operates exclusively within the United States. Telco Y holds a license
from the FCC, and is authorized to provide interstate and international telecommunication services
in the United States.
Telco Y sells international telecommunication services to Telco X for resale to its customers
in the country of Telco X. For example, Telco X is the interexchange carrier or local carrier for its
customers. When Telco X’s customer calls from London to New York City, the call originates and
is charged to London. Pursuant to section 186-e.2(a) of the Tax Law, the call is not taxed in
New York State. The sale of the telecommunication services by Telco Y to Telco X includes the
charges for access for the transmission of the call, that is, the sub-sea cable and the landing station
in New York City and the carrier access services in New York City.
Petitioner provided additional information stating that the foreign country in which Telco X
was organized and operates, does not formally refer to service providers as an “interexchange
carrier” or “common carrier”, but that Telco X is a common carrier in such country providing
telecommunication services within and without the country.

-2
TSB-A-01(16)C
Corporation Tax
April 17, 2001
Discussion
Section 186-e.1(g) of the Tax Law defines “telecommunication services”as “telephony or
telegraphy, or telephone or telegraph service, including, but not limited to, any transmission of voice,
image, data, information and paging, through the use of wire, cable, fiber-optic, laser, microwave,
radio wave, satellite or similar media or any combination thereof and shall include services that are
ancillary to the provision of telephone service....”
Section 186-e.1(e) of the Tax Law defines “provider of telecommunication services” as “any
person who furnishes or sells telecommunications services regardless of whether such activities are
the main business of such person or are only incidental thereto....”
Section 186-e.2(a) of the Tax Law imposes an excise tax on the “the sale of
telecommunication services by any person which is a provider of telecommunication services....”
The tax is imposed on gross receipts from: (1) any intrastate telecommunication services; (2) any
interstate and international telecommunication services (other than interstate and international
private telecommunication services) which originate or terminate in New York State and which
telecommunication services are charged to a service address in New York State, regardless of where
the amounts charged for such services are billed or ultimately paid; and (3) interstate and
international private telecommunication services, the gross receipts of which are apportioned as
prescribed in section 186-e.3 of the Tax Law.
Section 186-e.2(b)(1) of the Tax Law provides that certain sales for resale of
telecommunication services are excluded from tax. In order to qualify for this exclusion, the
purchaser must sell the purchased telecommunication services as telecommunication services.
Moreover, the purchaser must be an interexchange carrier or local carrier. Pursuant to Technical
Services Memorandum TSB-M-95(3)C, December 13, 1995, a provider may accept a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity issued by the PSC as evidence that a carrier is eligible for the
resale exclusion.
Section 186-e.1(b)(1) of the Tax Law provides that “interexchange carrier means any
provider of telecommunication services between two or more exchanges that qualifies as a common
carrier. Common carrier means any person engaged as a common carrier for hire in intrastate,
interstate or foreign telecommunication services.”
Section 186-e.1(b)(2) of the Tax Law provides that “local carrier” means any provider of
telecommunication services for hire to the public, which is subject to the supervision of the PSC and
is engaged in providing carrier access service to a switched network. For the sole purpose of the
application of the sale for resale exclusion under section 186-e.2(b) of the Tax Law, a reference to
an “interexchange carrier” or “local carrier” shall include a cellular common carrier which is a

-3
TSB-A-01(16)C
Corporation Tax
April 17, 2001

facilities-based cellular common carrier without regard to a determination of whether such carrier
is providing local or interexchange service as such.
In this case, Petitioner states that the foreign country in which Telco X operates does not
formally refer to service providers as an “interexchange carrier” or “local carrier”, but that Telco X
is a common carrier in such country. If Telco X can demonstrate that its activities in the country in
which it operates, if conducted in New York State, would constitute the activities of an
interexchange carrier as defined in section 186-e.1(b)(1) of the Tax Law or a local carrier as defined
in section 186-e.1(b)(2) of the Tax Law, Telco X would be treated as an interexchange carrier or a
local carrier for purposes of section 186-e of the Tax Law.
Pursuant to section 186-e.2(b)(1) of the Tax Law certain sales for resale of
telecommunication services are excluded from the tax. Telco Y’s sales of telecommunication
services to Telco X will qualify for the exclusion under such section 186-e.2(b)(1), if Telco X is
considered to be an interexchange carrier or a local carrier, and Telco X resells the
telecommunication services, as such, to its customers.

DATED: April 17, 2001

NOTE:

/s/
Jonathan Pessen
Tax Regulations Specialist III
Technical Services Division

The opinions expressed in Advisory Opinions are
limited to the facts set forth therein.