Is an optional maintenance agreement bought with a vehicle lease subject to Colorado sales tax?

Short answer The Department discusses an optional maintenance agreement under separability and separate-statement rules but makes no specific determination. The described facts included both a separate agreement and a separate lease line identifying the amount.
State
CO
Ruling
GIL 17-006
Tax type
Sales & Use Tax
Issued
2017-03-16
Issued by
Colorado Department of Revenue
Requested by
A vehicle-leasing company asking about an optional third-party maintenance agreement (taxpayer identity redacted by the Department)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2017. Ask about yours and see what current Colorado tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2017
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Colorado Department of Revenue General Information Letter (GIL). A GIL provides a general overview of the relevant tax issues but is NOT binding on the Department; it makes no specific determination and represents only the good-faith opinion of Department personnel. It does not address sales or use taxes administered by self-collected home-rule cities. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice. Consult a licensed Colorado tax professional about your situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A vehicle-leasing company asked about an optional maintenance agreement sold by a third party when a customer leases a vehicle. The agreement was separately signed, and the lease contract separately identified the financed maintenance amount. The Department gave general guidance and did not make a specific determination.

The letter explains that a maintenance agreement is generally taxable unless it is separable and separately stated. It describes optionality as relevant to separability. On the company's stated facts, the separate maintenance agreement and the separate line in the lease contract are the facts supporting the Department's discussion. The letter does not say that a separate contract alone, without the separately stated amount, always satisfies the rule.

What this means for you

For the arrangement described, review both requirements: the agreement must be optional, and its price must be separately stated. A separate contract and a separate lease line were both present in the facts discussed by the Department. The GIL does not decide a different contract structure.

Common questions

Q: Is an optional maintenance agreement automatically excluded from the taxable lease?
A: No. The letter describes exclusion when the agreement is both separable and separately stated, and it makes no specific determination.

Q: Does a separate contract alone establish the separately stated requirement?
A: The GIL's facts included both a separate contract and a separate line in the lease contract identifying the amount financed. It does not hold that a separate contract alone is sufficient in every arrangement.

Q: What makes the agreement separable?
A: The letter says an agreement is separable when it is optional. A required maintenance plan is not separable under that discussion.

Citations and references

Statutes:

  • § 39-26-102(23), C.R.S. (long-term lease of tangible personal property taxed on each lease payment as an installment sale)
  • § 39-26-713(1)(a), C.R.S. (short-term lessor is the consumer and pays tax on acquisition, or may obtain permission to collect tax on the lease payments)

Source

Original ruling text

Office of Tax Policy
P.O. Box 17087
Denver, CO 80217-0087
[email protected]

GIL-17-006

March 16, 2017
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Attn: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Re: Optional Maintenance Agreement
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXX,
You submitted on behalf of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (“Company”) a request for guidance on whether sales or use tax applies to Company’s optional maintenance agreement. The Colorado Department of Revenue (“Department”) issues general information letters and private letter rulings. A general information letter provides a general overview of the relevant tax issues, but is not binding on the Department. A private letter ruling provides a specific determination for a specific set of facts, is binding on the Department but not on the taxpayer, and requires payment of a fee. For more information about general information letters and private letter rulings, please see Department Rule 1 CCR 201-1, 24-35-103.5. The Department treats this request as a general information letter. It is important to remember that general information letters, such as this one, are general discussions of tax law and are not binding on the Department. If Company would like the Department to issue a private letter ruling on the issue raised here, Company can submit a request and pay the fee in compliance with Department Rule 1 CCR 201-1, 24-35-103.5. Issue Is the sale of an optional maintenance agreement entered into when a customer leases a vehicle subject to Colorado sales or use tax? Background Company is engaged in the business of leasing vehicles for periods between 24-48 months with some very limited 12 month leases. When leasing a vehicle, customers may purchase an optional maintenance agreement from a third party. The maintenance agreement is a separate contract from the lease contract and customers must separately sign each contract if they chose to purchase the maintenance agreement. The cost of the optional maintenance agreement can be financed within the lease and a separate line in the lease contract will identify the amount financed for the maintenance

agreement. Company charges Colorado sales tax on each monthly lease payment; however, the invoice for the monthly lease payment does not include a breakdown of the portion of the payment that relates to the optional maintenance agreement. Structure of Analysis To determine whether Company’s transaction is subject to sales tax, the Department will examine the following question:

  1. Is the maintenance agreement separable from the lease of taxable tangible personal
    property?
    Discussion
    Colorado imposes sales tax on each payment a lessee makes on a long-term lease of tangible personal property, including long-term leases of motor vehicles.1 Long-term leases are leases whose initial lease term is longer than three years. For short term leases, Colorado requires the lessor to pay tax when acquiring the leased property, or the Department may grant the lessor permission to acquire the leased property exempt from tax and collect sales tax on the lease payments throughout the lease.2 Maintenance agreements when sold in connection with the sale or lease of taxable tangible personal property are generally subject to Colorado sales or use tax unless the maintenance contract is separable and separately stated from the sale or lease of the taxable tangible personal property. Maintenance agreements must be separable from the sale or lease of tangible personal property to be excluded from the calculation of sales tax. A maintenance agreement is considered separable from tangible personal property when the agreement is optional. If the customer is required to purchase a maintenance agreement in order to lease the tangible personal property, such maintenance agreement is not separable from the tangible personal property. Company represents that the maintenance agreement is optional and the customer does not have to purchase such agreement in order to lease a vehicle. As such, the maintenance agreement is separable from the sale or lease of tangible personal property. In addition, maintenance agreements must be separately stated from the lease of the tangible personal property on an invoice. Company represents that the maintenance agreement is a separate contract from the lease contract and customers must separately sign each contract if they chose to purchase the maintenance agreement. Additionally, Company represents that if the cost of the maintenance agreement is included in the lease, there is a separate line item detailing the cost of the maintenance agreement in the lease contract. The separate line item in the lease contract detailing the cost of the maintenance agreement fulfills the requirement that the maintenance agreement be separately stated from the sale or lease of the tangible personal property. The fact that the monthly lease payment does not include a breakdown of the portion of the payment that relates to the optional maintenance agreement does not alter our conclusion. The customer knowingly entered into the agreement and can see the amount on their maintenance agreement contract. 1 2 2

§ 39-26-102(23), C.R.S.
§ 39-26-713(1)(a), C.R.S.
DR 4010A (06/11/14)

Miscellaneous
This letter represents the good faith opinion of Department personnel who are knowledgeable on state taxes issues. However, the Department does not make a specific determination here on any of the issues raised and the Department is not bound by this general information letter. The Department administers state and state-administered local sales and use taxes. This letter does not address sales and use taxes administered by home-rule cities and homerule counties. You may wish to consult with local governments which administer their own sales or use taxes about the applicability of those taxes. Visit our web site at www.colorado.gov/tax for more information about state and local sales taxes. Enclosed is a redacted version of this letter. Pursuant to statute and regulation, this redacted letter will be made public within 60 days of the date of this letter. Please let me know in writing within that 60 day period whether you have any suggestions or concerns about this redacted letter. Sincerely,

Office of Tax Policy
Colorado Department of Revenue

3

DR 4010A (06/11/14)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2017. Ezel checks current Colorado tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace