Were materials and supplies for an automatic sprinkler system at a United States military base exempt government purchases?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A contractor installing an automatic sprinkler-protection system at a United States military base believed its material purchases were exempt from California sales tax.
The letter disagreed. Because the sprinkler system or portions of it became part of the real property, section 6384 taxed the materials and supplies sold to the contractor for the work.
The letter acknowledged that separately furnished tangible personal property or qualifying machinery and equipment could potentially be bought for resale. But it doubted that any part of the sprinkler system proper would qualify, describing the system as almost entirely fixtures or construction materials.
Common questions
Was the installed sprinkler system a real-property improvement?
Yes.
Were the contractor's materials and supplies taxable?
Yes.
Could any project property be bought with a resale certificate?
Possibly, if it was separately furnished property or machinery and equipment under historical Ruling 12. The letter doubted that the sprinkler system itself qualified.
Citations and references
- Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code section 6384 — taxable material and supply sales for federal real-property construction
- Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12 — government-contractor and machinery-and-equipment treatment discussed
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/565-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/565-0620.pdf
Original ruling text
565.0620
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
August 20, 1951
Attention: REDACTED TEXT
Gentlemen:
We acknowledge your letter of July 25 informing us that you have been awarded a contract by the [U.S.] for the installation of an automatic sprinkler protection system at the [United States Military base]. Your understanding that State sales tax does not apply with respect to the sale to you of materials purchased for use on this contract is incorrect. As this sprinkler protection system or portions thereof undoubtedly becomes a part of real property, the sale to you of the materials and supplies which you use in the performance of this contract is subject to sales tax under the express provisions of Section 6384 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. Sales and Use Tax Ruling 12, copy enclosed, explains the application of the tax with respect to sales to Government contractors. It is possible that you may furnish some tangible personal property to the Government or that portions of the installation may fall within the category of “machinery and equipment” as defined in Ruling 12. Should this be so, you could properly issue a resale certificate to vendors for property becoming a part of “machinery and equipment” as defined. We doubt, however, that any portion of the automatic sprinkler protection system proper would be thus classified. We believe it would consist almost entirely of “fixtures” as defined in the ruling or of construction materials. We are forwarding to you herewith a duplicate Seller’s Permit replacing the permit which you have lost. Very truly yours, E. H. Stetson Tax Counsel
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace