Was California Redemption Value included in the cost measure when a beverage distributor self-consumed beverages bought under a resale certificate?

Short answer No for the distributor's own use-tax measure because CRV arose on its later transfer, not its purchase. Downstream consumers generally included CRV in cost.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.0155
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
2003-07-07
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Special Projects supervisor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2003. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 2003
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 7, 2003 internal memorandum assumes valid resale certificates and nonexempt self-consumption. The requester's March 10 memorandum and the printed July 27, 2001 Department of Conservation FAQ are quoted but not separately reproduced in the official PDF; the opinion supplies their content. It distinguishes the beverage distributor's acquisition from a later purchaser's or recipient's acquisition and notes a possible qualified-organization donation exemption without deciding it. Current CRV, donation, sales-price, resale, and use-tax rules control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Beverage distributors bought beverage ingredients and containers under resale certificates and sometimes consumed or donated finished beverages. The question was whether California Redemption Value had to be included in the cost on which use tax was computed.

For the distributor's own self-consumption, CRV was not part of cost. The fee was not imposed on the distributor's purchase from its supplier; it arose when the distributor later sold or transferred the covered container to a dealer or consumer.

For a downstream person who purchased or received the beverage from the distributor and then self-consumed it, CRV was part of the sales price and therefore part of cost. The memorandum also said CRV remained payable on covered beverages donated by a distributor, while assuming no separate qualified-organization exemption applied.

Common questions

Did a distributor add CRV to its own use-tax cost when consuming inventory?

No. CRV was imposed at the later transfer stage, not on the supplier's sale to the distributor.

Was CRV included for a downstream consumer?

Yes. Once included in the downstream acquisition's sales price, it became part of that person's cost.

Citations and references

  • California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act and Public Resources Code section 14560 — distributor CRV obligation stated
  • California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 2320 — CRV imposed when the distributor transfers the container to a dealer or consumer
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6011 and 6201 — sales-price definition and use-tax measure
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6403 — qualified-organization donation exemption noted but assumed inapplicable
  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 1668(g) — self-use after a resale-certificate purchase
  • Sales and Use Tax Annotation 195.0150 (November 4, 1993) — downstream CRV sales-price treatment cited by comparison
  • Requester's March 10, 2003 memorandum — inconsistent audit treatment and request for an annotatable opinion quoted; separate memorandum not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling web page, “'More' Frequently Asked Questions,” dated July 27, 2001 — donated-beverage CRV question and answer quoted from a printed copy; separate page not reproduced in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Department-MIC: 82

Memorandum

195.0155

To :

Mr. Vic Anderson, Supervisor
Special Projects (MIC 40)

Date:

From :

Robert D. Tucker, Tax Counsel
Legal Department (MIC 82)

Telephone:
CalNet:

Subject:

California Redemption Value Fee and Self Consumed
Beverages by a Beverage Distributor

July 7, 2003

(916) 322-2976
8-492-2976

This is in response to your memo dated March 10, 2003 requesting information on how use tax applies to beverages self-consumed by beverage distributors. I apologize for the delay in my response. You write: “We request an opinion [on] whether the California Redemption Value (CRV) is part of the cost subject to use tax on beverages self-consumed by beverage distributors. It is our intent to recommend annotation of the opinion provided. There has been inconsistent treatment of the CRV audits of beverage distributors and we have not found clear legal guidelines to resolve the issue.” For the purpose of this response, we assume that beverage distributors purchase the tangible personal property that is incorporated into the beverages (and the beverage containers) they sell using a valid and timely resale certificate. Accordingly, we assume the beverage distributors do not pay sales tax reimbursement (or use tax) when purchasing this tangible personal property. As you are aware, a purchaser who issues a resale certificate for the purchase of tangible personal property and who thereafter makes any storage or use of the property other than retention, demonstration, or display while holding it for sale in the regular course of business is liable for use tax on the cost of the property. (Reg. 1668(g).) You ask if the California Redemption Value (CRV) fee is to be included in the cost of the property upon which the use tax is computed. The Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act places a CRV fee on the beverage distributor on all beverage containers sold or offered for sale in this state by the distributor. (Pub. Resources Code, § 14560.) As relevant here, you provided a printed copy of a Department of Conservation, Division of Recycling, web page titled, “ ‘More’ Frequently Asked Questions,” dated July 27, 2001. This list of questions includes the following question: “Is a distributor required to report and pay CRV on products donated to charitable organizations, institutions, etc.? “Yes. CRV must be paid to the department on all covered beverages, whether sold or transferred in this state.”

Mr. Vic Anderson

-2-

July 7, 2003
195.0155

Accordingly, the CRV is required to be paid when a beverage distributor donates beverages to a charitable organization or other third party. Use tax applies to the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property purchased from any retailer for the storage, use, or other consumption in this state, measured by a percentage of the sales price, unless that use is specifically exempt by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code,
§§ 6011, 6201.) “Sales price” generally includes all amounts received with respect to the sale of tangible personal property, with no deduction for the cost of materials used, labor or service costs or other expenses of the retailer, or the cost of transportation of the property, unless there is a specific statutory exclusion. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 6011.) We assume that the use of the property is not an exempt use of the property (e.g., this is not property donated by retailers to qualified organizations and therefore subject to exemption as provided in Revenue and Taxation Code section 6403). As relevant here, the CRV is not imposed on the sale of tangible personal property to the beverage distributor. Rather, the fee is imposed on the beverage distributor upon the transfer of the container to a dealer or consumer. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 2320.) Accordingly, since the CRV fee is not a fee that is paid to the seller of the tangible personal property to the beverage distributor, but rather is a fee paid by the beverage distributor upon the sale or transfer of the containers to third parties, it is not included in the “sales price” of the tangible personal property to the beverage distributor and therefore is not a component of the “cost” upon which the use tax is computed to be due. On the other hand, if the tangible personal property (the beverage and beverage container) is self-consumed by, or transferred to, someone other than a beverage distributor (someone who has purchased or received the tangible personal property from the beverage distributor), since the CRV is thereafter included in the “sales price” of the tangible personal property, the CRV is a component of the cost upon which the use tax is computed. (Cf. Sales and Use Tax Annotation 195.0150 (11/4/93).) I hope this answers your questions. If you have any further questions after reviewing this memo, please write again. RDT:ds cc:

Ms. Janice Thurston (MIC:82)
Ms. Charlotte Paliani (MIC:92)
Ms. Sharon Jarvis (MIC:82)
Mr. Jeffrey L. McGuire (MIC:40)
Ms. Sandy McCaleb (MIC:43)
Mr. James Kuhl (MIC:40)
Mr. Dave Rosenthal (MIC:50)
Mr. Tim Kennedy (MIC:40)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 2003. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace