Did the American Red Cross have to collect California use tax when it regularly sold used chapter vehicles?

Short answer Yes, if it met the then-current retailer threshold of more than two retail sales in 12 months. Its federal status exempted direct sales tax on the Red Cross but did not remove its duty to collect use tax from individual vehicle buyers.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 560.0140
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1963-01-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
American Red Cross regional office

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1963. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1963
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a January 2, 1963 California State Board of Equalization tax-counsel letter to an American Red Cross regional office, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It applies a then-current section 6019 threshold and states the historical combined rate as 4%; neither figure should be assumed current. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Red Cross chapter changed from using automobiles until worn out to selling them after about two years, generally to individual customers. California treated the Red Cross as a federal instrumentality exempt from direct sales tax on its sales.

That immunity did not eliminate a retailer's duty to collect use tax from customers. Under the statute then in effect, a corporation making more than two retail sales of tangible personal property in a 12-month period was a retailer, and section 6203 required a retailer to collect and remit use tax.

Sales to automobile dealers for resale were exempt if supported by a resale certificate. The letter directed chapters meeting the retailer threshold to collect tax from individual buyers and file returns.

What this means for you

Red Cross chapters, nonprofit fleet managers, and vehicle-sale advisers

Separate the organization's immunity from the customer's use-tax liability and collection mechanics. Confirm current retailer thresholds, rates, and resale-certificate rules before a fleet disposition.

Common questions

Q: Was direct sales tax imposed on the Red Cross?

A: No.

Q: Could the Red Cross still have a collection duty?

A: Yes, when classified as a retailer.

Q: What about sales to dealers for resale?

A: They were exempt with a resale certificate.

Citations and references

  • Former California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6019
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6203

Source

Original ruling text

560.0140

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

January 2, 1963

W--- A--- American Red Cross
XX --- Street
--- ---, California
Attention:

Mr. D--- W. S---, Manager

Gentlemen:
Our San Diego District Office has recently had an inquiry from the --- --- Chapter of the American Red Cross concerning the application of the California Sales and Use Tax Law to the disposal of used automotive equipment by the Red Cross chapter. Since the problem involved may be common to other California chapters of the Red Cross, we thought it advisable to express our views to the W--- A--- office in order that there be uniformity of their understanding of the California Sales and Use Tax Law. We were informed that the --- --- Chapter of the American Red Cross formerly drove its cars until they were worn out. Apparently, it is now the policy to drive automobiles for two years and then sell them. We understand that the sales of cars are made to individual customers and the sales prices are anywhere from approximately $1700 to $2100 each. We have uniformly considered that the American Red Cross is an arm of the United States Government and is therefore exempt from payment of the California tax on sales made by it. This exemption from the sales tax does not, however, operate to relieve a corporate instrumentality of the Federal Government from collection of the California use tax from the customer to which sales are made if the seller is, under our law, a retailer. Section 6019 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that every corporation making more than two sales of tangible personal property during any 12 month period shall be considered a retailer. A retailer, under Section 6203 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, must collect use tax from the purchaser upon sales made in California. The rate of the use tax is the same as that of the sales tax, or 4% state and local tax. The customer is liable to the retailer for the tax as well as being liable to the state. It would therefore appear that if the American Red Cross is making a sufficient number of sales to be classified as a retailer, that at the time of each sale of its used automobiles to individuals it should collect from the purchaser 4% of the purchase price. The amounts of tax collected from the customer should be remitted to the State Board of Equalization with a sales and use tax return.

W--- A--- American Red Cross

-2-

January 2, 1963
560.0140

Sales of used automobiles made to automobile dealers would be exempt from tax because they are sales for resale. However, a resale certificate should be obtained from the dealer in such case. If you have any questions with respect to the application of the California Sales and Use Tax Law to the sale of automobiles by your chapters, kindly get in touch with us. There is enclosed for your information a pamphlet containing the provisions of the law. Also enclosed is a list of our office locations where detailed information concerning returns and payments may be obtained. Very truly yours,

Charles H. Otterman
Tax Counsel

CHO:dse
Encl.
cc:

San Diego - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1963. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace