Were Coast Guard Auxiliary sales of boating-safety instruction pamphlets subject to California tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1959. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California examined whether the Coast Guard Auxiliary was a federal agency or instrumentality when it sold instruction pamphlets.
Title 14 described the Auxiliary as a nonmilitary organization administered by the Coast Guard Commandant to aid nonmilitary operations, rescue work, boating safety and efficiency, and public knowledge of boating laws. Coast Guard resources and appropriations were available to carry out those purposes.
Selling the instruction pamphlets furthered those federal purposes. The memorandum therefore treated the Auxiliary as a United States instrumentality to that extent and found the sales nontaxable, while expressly reserving other future transactions.
What this means for you
Auxiliary units, boating educators, and nonprofit tax advisers
Tie the transaction directly to the federally assigned mission. This opinion did not grant a blanket exemption for everything the Auxiliary might sell.
Common questions
Q: Were the instruction-pamphlet sales taxable?
A: No.
Q: Was the Auxiliary treated as a federal instrumentality for all purposes?
A: The memorandum decided only the pamphlet activity and left other transactions open.
Citations and references
- Title 14, United States Code, governing the Coast Guard Auxiliary as discussed in the memorandum
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Annotation page: Annotation 560.0080
- Original supporting opinion: 560.0080 PDF
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
560.0080
Memorandum
To:
San Francisco – Auditing (ESA)
From:
Headquarters – Sales Tax Counsel (SGL)
Subject:
United States Coast Guard Auxiliary
Date:
March 19, 1959
You inquire as to whether this organization is an agency or instrumentality of the United States Government. It appears that this question has arisen in regard to sales by this organization of certain instruction pamphlets. It is specifically provided in Title 14 of the United States Code that the Coast Guard Auxiliary is a nonmilitary organization administered by the Commandant of the Coast Guard under the direction of the secretary. The purposes of this organization as stated in the law are to aid the Coast Guard in its nonmilitary operations, particularly in regard to rescue operations and to promoting safety and efficiency in the operation of motor boats and yachts, and to foster a wider knowledge of, and better compliance with, the laws, rules, and regulations governing the operation of motor boats and yachts. The law also provides that the service facilities and appropriations for the Coast Guard shall be available to effectuate the purposes of the auxiliary. The regulations of the Coast Guard Commandant set forth the basic organization of the auxiliary and also set forth the qualification for membership. The authority to enroll and disenroll rests with the Commandant or the Coast Guard officer to whom he delegates this authority. The Commandant has delegated the responsibility for supervising the auxiliary to a staff member (a Coast Guard officer) who is called the “Chief Director”. Likewise, the Coast Guard District Commanders have also delegated to a staff officer, who is calling the “Director” the responsibility for the administration of the auxiliary within the district. However, the functioning of the organization is to a large degree left to the auxiliary members and their elected officers with the Coast Guard exercising very little actual supervision. It appears that in selling the pamphlets in question, this organization is carrying out the purposes set forth in Title 14 of the U. S. Code and, therefore, at least to that extent is acting as an instrumentality of the United States Government. Consequently, we are of the opinion that the sales of these pamphlets by this organization are not taxable. However, we leave the question open as to other types of transactions in which this organization may engage in the future. Stanley G. Lerner
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1959. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace