How was a lump-sum school license for satellite instruction, interactive communications, magazines, guides, kits, and a videotape taxed?

Short answer Broadcast instruction and interactive communications were nontaxable services, but tax applied to the fair retail selling price of the included magazines, guide, kit or books, and videotape.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0013.850
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-03-18
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A multistate tax adviser for a nonprofit educational-programming company (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Supervising Staff Counsel opinion dated March 18, 1996, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It assumes the broadcasts provided substantial instruction and that the video programs, interactive network, and telephone support transferred no tangible property. Another provider should check current educational-service, streaming, telecommunications, school-sale, instructional-material, and bundled-license rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A nonprofit company charged school districts an annual site license of about $2,500 per curriculum. The package included satellite video instruction, professional-development broadcasts, an interactive student-and-teacher network, telephone support, student magazines, a teacher guide, a science kit or literature starter set, and a parental-involvement videotape.

Assuming the broadcasts supplied substantial instruction and no physical copy of the programming or network service was transferred, tax did not apply to the portion attributable to the broadcast and interactive services.

Tax did apply to the fair retail selling price of the tangible items: the magazines, teacher guide, science kit or literature books, and videotape. The opinion compared the package to a correspondence course, where instruction is a service but books and lesson materials remain taxable.

What this means for you

Educational content providers

A single license can contain both nontaxable instruction and taxable physical materials.

School districts

The provider must assign a fair retail selling price to included books, kits, magazines, guides, and recorded media.

Accountants and tax professionals

Document the instructional value of the service and the fair retail value of every tangible component.

Common questions

Q: Was satellite instruction taxable?

A: No, under the opinion's assumptions.

Q: Were the interactive network and telephone support taxable?

A: No, because they transferred no tangible property.

Q: Which included items were taxable?

A: Student magazines, the teacher guide, the science kit or literature set, and the videotape.

Q: Did lump-sum pricing make the whole license taxable?

A: No. Tax applied to the fair retail selling price of the physical items, not the broadcast-service portion.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6012(a)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1501, 1526, and 1546(b)(1)

Source

Original ruling text

515.0013.850

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

LEGAL DIVISION – MIC: 85
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082
TELEPHONE (916) 324-2653
FAX (916) 324-2618

DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

March 18, 1996
E. L. SORENSEN, JR
Executive Director

Mr. J--- F--Senior Manager
Multistate Tax Services
--- & --- LLP
XXXX --- Boulevard
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Dear Mr. F---:
This is in reply to your December 19, 1995 letter regarding the application of sales and use tax to charges for educational programming a company provides to school districts. You provided the following background information: “‘The Company is a not-for-profit corporation that sells educational programming services to school districts. These services feature science and language art curricula broadcast nationwide via satellite with an interactive communications network linking students and teachers nationwide. The Company charges a lump-sum school site annual license fee of approximately $2,500 per curricula with discount pricing available. The following items are included with the site license fee: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Interactive Language Arts and/or Science Video Program Series Video series on professional development Student and teacher participation in the interactive network Curriculum support available through a 800 telephone number One set of student magazines (quantity of 30 magazines per set) One teacher resource guide. One basic science kit and/or literature starter set One video tape regarding parental involvement in education.

“Items 1 and 2 consist solely of broadcast programming services. Items 3 and 4 consist solely of voice and data transmission via telephone lines. Items 5 through 8 consist of tangible personal property (TPP), books, materials, etc. Additional books and materials are available upon request for an additional charge which is separately stated from the annual license fee.”

Mr. J--- F---

-2-

March 18, 1996
515.0013.850

We assume items 1 and 2 result in the company’s merely providing remote site broadcasting of the video programs to the school districts and that the company does not transfer videotapes or other tangible personal property embodying the programs. We also assume that items 3 and 4 do not result in the company transferring tangible personal property to the school districts. Finally, we assume items 1 and 2 have substantial value in that the company provides significant instruction through the language, science, and professional development broadcast video series. As you noted, when the true object of a contract is for a person to render services, tax does not apply to the charge regardless that the person providing the service incidentally transfers some tangible personal property to a client. Sales and use Tax Regulation 1501, Service Enterprises Generally, gives the example of a firm which performs business advisory, recordkeeping, payroll, and tax services. Tax does not apply to the charge for those services regardless that the firm incidentally provides forms, binders, and other property to its clients in rendering the services. Rather, tax applies to the sale of the tangible personal property to the service provider. On the other hand, when the true object of a contract is the sale of tangible personal property, tax applies to the total gross receipts of the sale with no deduction for the cost of the property sold, materials used, labor or service cost, or any other expense. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012, subd. (a).) We recognize that there are certain transactions which result in both the performance of a service and the sale of tangible personal property for a single price. For example, under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1526, tax does not apply to charges to repair or recondition tangible personal property to refit it for the use for which it was originally produced. However, if the repairman furnishes parts and materials in connection with the repair work which have a retail value of more than ten percent of the total charge, the repairman is the retailer of the parts and materials. Tax applies to the portion of the repairman’s charge which represents the fair retail selling price of the parts and materials. (Sales and Use Tax Reg. 1546, subd. (b)(1).) The Board’s legal staff has taken the following position regarding charges for correspondence courses: “Tax applies to books and lesson materials furnished to students in connection with a correspondence course. If the price of the books and materials is not separately stated, the tax applies to their fair retail selling price. The school may purchase all such books and materials for resale. Tax does not apply to books and materials mailed to an out-of-state student.” (Bus. Taxes Law Guide Annot. 295.0140 (10/23/53).) Again, assuming the company to which you refer provides significant instruction through the broadcast of the video series, we believe the application of tax is the same as to charges for a correspondence course; that is, tax does not apply to the portion of the company’s charge attributable to the broadcast services (items 1 through 4). Tax does apply to the fair retail selling price of the set of student magazines, the teacher resource guide, the science kit or literature

Mr. J--- F---

-3-

March 18, 1996
515.0013.850

starter set, and the videotape on the subject of parental involvement in education (items 5 through 8). We hope this answers your questions; however, if you need further information, feel free to write again. Very truly yours,

Ronald L. Dick
Supervising Staff Counsel
RLD:sr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace