Could a tank-truck water provider treat its customer charge as a nontaxable delivery service rather than a sale of water?

Short answer No under the described facts. Obtaining and delivering the water was a retail sale, and because title apparently passed at delivery, the truck transportation was taxable too.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0700
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1965-04-26
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Tank-truck water provider

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1965
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 26, 1965 letter addressed a provider that obtained water and delivered it to customers by tank truck. California inferred that at least part of the charge was for water itself and that title did not pass until delivery. The letter contrasted tank-truck delivery with water through mains, lines, or pipes and identified one potentially different service: moving water already owned by the customer. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Water ownership, title timing, delivery method, charge breakdown, seller status, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A provider obtained water and delivered it to customers by tank truck. It characterized the charge as a service.

California said the provider was selling water because it acquired the water and transferred title to customers. Unlike water delivered through mains, lines, or pipes, tank-truck delivery did not receive that treatment.

Because title apparently stayed with the seller until customer delivery, transportation was part of the taxable sales measure. Merely moving water already owned by the customer could produce a different service result.

Common questions

Was the entire charge just a service?

No.

Were the seller's tank-truck delivery charges taxable?

Yes, under the assumed title timing.

What different transaction did the letter identify?

Transporting water that already belonged to the customer.

Citations and references

  • Historical Sales Tax Ruling 58 — delivery-charge treatment referenced in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

557.0700

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
April 26, 1965
Gentlemen:
In answer to your letter of April 19, our opinion is that at least a portion of your charge must be considered as being for the water itself, rather than just a "service" performed by you. By obtaining water and delivering it to your customers, it seems to us that you are selling water, transferring title thereto to your customers. Since the delivery is by tank truck, there is no exemption, as in the case of water delivered through mains, lines or pipes. It also appears to us that you, undoubtedly, do not pass title to the water to your customers until you have delivered it to them, in which case even your charge for transportation of the water would be part of the measure of the sales tax, as explained in Ruling 58, copy enclosed. The only situation we can think of in which your charge for delivering the water would be free from sales tax would be if you simply contracted to move water belonging to your customer from one point to another. We have referred your letter and a copy of this reply to our Riverside office. You will probably hear from that office shortly in reference to your need for a seller's permit and to secure additional information, which may have a bearing on the application of the tax. Very truly yours E. H. Stetson Tax Counsel EHS:fb [lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1965. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace