Was a grocery store's separately stated $3.50 delivery charge taxable when employees delivered orders in the store's vehicle?

Short answer Yes for taxable goods because title passed at customer delivery without an earlier written agreement. Exempt-food delivery was exempt, and mixed orders required proration.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 557.0111
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1997-06-25
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Certified public accountant for a redacted grocery store

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1997. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1997
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 25, 1997 letter addressed a grocer charging $3.50 for delivery in its own vehicle, billing the customer's account when the order was placed, delivering directly from the store, and having no explicit pre-delivery written title agreement. It accepted that $3.50 was reasonable and separately stated. The conclusion distinguished taxable merchandise, exempt food under section 6359, and mixed orders. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Written title terms, carrier versus retailer facilities, delivered-price contracts, product mix, reasonable charge, and current delivery rules can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A grocery store charged customers $3.50 for delivery in the store's own vehicle. It separately stated the charge and billed the customer's account when the order was placed, but had no explicit written agreement passing title before delivery.

California said charging the account did not establish an earlier sale. When a retailer delivers in its own vehicle, title and the sale occur at the customer's destination unless a pre-delivery written agreement says otherwise. The store's delivery therefore occurred before the sale was complete, making the delivery charge taxable to the extent the order contained taxable goods.

Delivery of an order consisting only of exempt food was not taxable. For mixed orders, the $3.50 charge had to be prorated between taxable merchandise and exempt food; the letter's $15 example taxed one-third of the charge when $5 of the order was taxable.

Common questions

Did billing the account when the order was placed pass title?

No.

Was a food-only delivery charge taxable?

No, under the section 6359 food exemption described.

How were mixed orders handled?

The delivery charge was prorated according to taxable and exempt merchandise.

Citations and references

  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6051 and 6012 — sales tax and gross receipts
  • Cal. Rev. & Tax. Code § 6359 — exempt food products
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1628(b)(2) — retailer-facility transportation exclusion conditions
  • Cal. Code Regs., tit. 18, reg. 1628(b)(3)(D) — title passes at destination for retailer delivery absent an earlier explicit written agreement

Source

Original ruling text

557.0111
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
TELEPHONE: (916) 327-2291
FAX : (916) 324-2586

DEAN F. ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
_______

June 25, 1997

JOHN CHIANG
Acting Member
Fourth District, Los Angeles
_______

Ms. M--- D--Certified Public Accountant
XX --- --- Parkway
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX

E. L. SORENSEN, JR.
Executive Director

Re: Delivery Charges
M--- & M---, Inc.
dba T--- Market
Account No. SR -- XX-XXXXXX
Dear Ms. D---:
This is in response to your letter of April 22, 1997 in which you inquire about the application of sales tax to separately stated delivery charges when delivery of the merchandise is made by facilities of the retailer. As I understand the facts, your client M--- & M---, dba T--- Market (T---), is a grocer which, for an additional charge of $3.50, will deliver groceries to its customers. You explain that the deliveries are made by a T--- vehicle and that the sales are not C.O.D., but are charged to the customer’s account at the time the order for the merchandise is placed. It is your contention that, since T--- charges orders to the client’s account at the time the order is made, the sale has occurred prior to the delivery of the merchandise. As you know, the general rule is that retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempted by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1628(b)(2) explains the circumstances under which transportation charge for deliveries by a retailer's facilities may be excluded from tax: “[W]hen transportation is by facilities of the retailer or the property is sold for a delivered price, tax applies to charges for transportation to the purchaser, unless (A) the transportation charges are separately stated, (B) are for transportation from the retailer's place of business or other point from which shipment is made directly to the purchaser, and (C) the transportation occurs after the sale of the property is made to the purchaser. When the sale occurs before the transportation to the purchaser commences, the tax does not apply to separately stated charges for the transportation. The amount that may be excluded from the measure of the

Ms. M--- D---

-2-

June 25, 1997
557.0111

tax cannot exceed a reasonable charge for transportation by facilities of the retailer or the cost of transportation by other than facilities of the retailer.” It is your position that you have satisfied all of the requirements of Regulation 1628(b)(2)(A)-(C). From the evidence you have presented it appears that you have met the first two requirements by separately listing charges for delivery and by providing deliveries from your place of business directly to the purchaser or the purchaser's designee. It also appears that a charge of $3.50 for the delivery of groceries is a reasonable charge for transportation. Since you deliver the property in your own facilities, the remaining issue is whether transportation to the purchaser occurs prior to the sale of the property to the purchaser. If not, the charges for delivery are not excludable from tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012, Reg. 1628(b)(2).) Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1628(b)(3)(D) explains a sale takes place as follows: “Unless explicitly agreed that title is to pass at a prior time, the sale occurs at the time and place at which the retailer completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the property, even though a document of title is to be delivered at a different time or place. If the contract requires or authorizes the retailer to send the property to the purchaser but does not require him to deliver it at destination, the retailer completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the property at the time and place of shipment, e.g. delivery of the property to a carrier for delivery by the carrier to the purchaser; but if the contract expressly requires delivery at destination, including cases where one of the terms of the contract is F.O.B. place of destination, the retailer completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery of the property on tender to the purchaser there. When delivery of the property is by facilities of the retailer, title passes when the property is delivered to the purchaser at the destination unless there is an explicit written agreement executed prior to the delivery that title is to pass at some other time.” (Emphasis added.) This means that, unless T--- and its customers explicitly agree to pass title prior to delivery, title passes, and the sale occurs, at the time the groceries are delivered to the customers. (Reg. 1628(b)(3)(D).) You have not provided evidence of an explicit written agreement with your customers passing title prior to delivery. We, therefore, conclude that the sale occurs at the time T--- completes delivery. As such, T---’s charges for transportation are subject to sales tax and cannot be excluded from its gross receipts. Regulation 1628 only applies to sales of products which are subject to the imposition of sales and use tax. Thus, under the facts as described, if an order delivered by T--- to its customer consists solely of food products, exempt from Taxation pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code section 6359, the delivery charges would not be subject to sales and use. From the information you have provided it appears that the orders received from T---’s customers include combinations of taxable merchandise and exempt food products. Under these circumstances, and where title does not pass prior to delivery, the delivery charges should be prorated between taxable and non-taxable products with sales tax imposed upon the portion of

Ms. M--- D---

-3-

June 25, 1997
557.0111

the delivery charges attributable to the products which are subject to sales tax. (Business Taxes Law Guide Annot. 557.0107 (1/25/94).) For example, if T--- delivers merchandise to its customers totaling $15.00 consisting of $10.00 exempt food products and $5.00 taxable merchandise, one third of the delivery charges would be subject to sales tax. If you have further questions, feel free to write again. Sincerely,

Patricia Hart Jorgensen
Senior Tax Counsel

PHJ:rz
cc:

--- --- District Administrator - -Ms. Monique L. Everson, Return Analysis (MIC 35)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1997. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace