Should a restaurant and a food shop around the corner be combined for California's 80/80 rule when only a back-kitchen door connected them?

Short answer No, assuming the shared kitchen passage was not open to the public for access between locations. Each establishment was analyzed separately.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0265
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1990-05-03
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A restaurant partner asking whether a nearby food shop should be combined for the 80/80 rule (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1990. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1990
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1990 senior-tax-counsel letter assumes the restaurant and food shop were around the corner from one another and connected only by a back-kitchen door that the public could not use to move between locations. It did not determine either location's taxable-sales percentages. Current law controls over the annotation. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An operator ran a restaurant on one street and a food shop around the corner. The only physical connection was a door into the back kitchen area. The operator asked whether the two establishments had to be combined when applying California's 80/80 food rule.

The Board said no, assuming the common kitchen passage was not open to the public as access between the two locations. The restaurant and food shop were separate establishments for deciding whether the 80/80 rule applied.

Because the locations were separated, the letter did not decide what percentage of either establishment's sales was taxable.

Common questions

Did a shared back kitchen automatically combine the businesses?

No. The source treated them separately because the connecting passage was assumed not to be public access.

Would a customer-accessible connection change the result?

The letter did not decide that scenario. Its conclusion expressly depended on the connection being closed to the public.

Did the Board determine whether either location actually met the 80/80 percentages?

No. Separation of the establishments made that question unnecessary for this opinion.

Citations and references

  • The source's stated two-part 80/80 rule for food sellers

Source

Original ruling text

550.0265

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-5589

May 3, 1990

Ms. D--- T---, Partner
P--- S---’s C--- Restaurant
P.O. Box XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Re:

SR --- XX-XXXXXX

Dear Ms. T---:
This is in response to your letter of March 16, 1990. You have requested our opinion regarding the correct application of tax to sales by your food shop located at XXX Y--- Street in Nevada City. As we understand, you operate a Restaurant located at XXX B--- Street in Nevada City and the food shop located around the corner. The only connection between the two is a door into the back kitchen area. You wish to know whether these two locations will be treated as one location for purposes of determining whether you are subject to the “80-80 Rule.” Briefly stated, the “80-80 Rule” is applied if: 1. Over 80 percent of the seller’s gross receipts are from the sales of food products; and 2. Over 80 percent of the seller’s retail sales of food products are taxable either as food products sold as meals; food products furnished, prepared, or served for consumption at facilities provided by the retailer or at an establishment which is defined as a ‘drive-in’; or food products sold as hot prepared food. A retailer in a type of operation which generally exceeds the percentages of the ‘80-80 Rule’ (such as a fast food restaurant) should collect tax on all sales of food products sold in a form suitable for consumption on the seller’s premises. We are of the opinion that your two establishments should not be treated together for purposes of determining whether the ’80-80 Rule’ is required to be applied. Our opinion is based on the assumption that the common kitchen area is not open to the public for access to both

Ms. D--- T---

-2-

May 3, 1990
550.0265

locations. Because of our conclusion, we need not address the question of what percentage of your sales are taxable. We are enclosing a copy of the Board’s Tax Tip Pamphlet “The Dining and Beverage Industry” for your future reference. If you have further questions concerning this matter, please write this office again. Very truly yours,

Mary C. Armstrong
Senior Tax Counsel

MCA:wak
2147C

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1990. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace