Were ready-to-eat food sales inside an amusement park taxable when patrons used nearby park tables and chairs?

Short answer Yes. The nearby eating areas were rationally connected to the park's food stands and counted as retailer facilities, making the food sales taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 550.0050
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-11-17
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An internal audit inquiry about an amusement-park food operator

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1994 internal legal memorandum assumes the park's ready-to-eat food was not sold on a takeout basis and analyzes eating areas located near its food operations. Its facilities conclusion depends on a rational connection between the seller and the tables, chairs, and benches. Current law controls over the annotation. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An amusement park sold ready-to-eat food at stands near two areas with indoor and outdoor tables, chairs, and benches. The fenced park charged separately for attractions but did not charge general admission, and patrons did not come to buy food for takeout.

Because the food was not sold on a takeout or to-go basis, the cited takeout rule did not control. The question was whether the park's eating areas were facilities connected to the food sellers.

Counsel found the required rational connection. The seating was close to the food operations and appeared to be placed for consuming food bought at the park. That made the tables, chairs, and benches retailer facilities under the cited rule, so the food sales were taxable even when a patron carried the food to another part of the park to eat it.

Common questions

Did fencing the park make the whole park the seller's premises?

The memorandum did not rely on a whole-park premises rule. It focused on the connection between the food stands and the nearby eating facilities.

Why did the takeout rule not apply?

The source says patrons did not buy the food on a takeout basis; it was ready to eat and intended for consumption in the park.

Did carrying food away from the tables make a particular sale exempt?

No. Once the nearby seating qualified as facilities connected to the food operations, the source treated park food sales as taxable even if patrons ate elsewhere in the park.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1603(c) and (f) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization
Legal Division

Memorandum

To:

Mr. Charles Tavookjian
Supervising Tax Auditor - --- (--)

From:

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel

Subject:

Sales of Food in an Amusement Park

Date:

November 17, 1994

I am answering your memorandum to me dated September 28, 1994. You were following up on our previous telephone conversation regarding sales of food products inside a private amusement park. You describe the park operation as follows: "The taxpayer operates an amusement park which is made up of an arcade area, miniature golf course, water slides, and a baseball batting range. The entire park is fenced in. There is no admission charge. Once in the park one can take advantage of the various attractions for a fee. There are two eating facilities at the park. One is in the main arcade area which seats about 18 inside at tables and chairs and six to eight round concrete tables and benches seating four each located right outside of the arcade area. In addition, there is a `Captain Kids' area which has inside tables and chairs for about 35 with concrete tables and benches right out side seating about another 30. The food products are all sold in a ready to eat condition. No one comes to the park for the express purpose of buying food to take out." You ask if the entire park would be considered "premises" of the seller under Regulation 1603(c) or would Regulation 1603(f) apply. OPINION Regulation 1603(c) applies to subject sales of food sold on a "take-out" or "to-go" basis to tax if certain conditions are met. You state that people do not come to the park to buy food on a to-go basis. You do not, however, indicate the kind of food-selling operations that are there. From your statement regarding to-go purchases, I conclude that people buy food at food stands located in the park (whether run by the park owners or concessionaires) to consume at the two areas you describe and, possibly, at other areas in the park. Some food may be taken out, but the food is not sold on that basis. Since the food is not sold on a "take-out" basis, Regulation

Mr. Charles Tavookjian

-2-

November 17, 1994
550.0050

1603(c) cannot apply to these sales. The issue, then, is if the two eating areas you describe are "facilities of the retailer" under Regulation 1603(f). We have previously held that, for eating facilities located in the same general area as the food retailer to be considered as facilities furnished for consumption of the retailer's products by the person with whom the retailer contracts to sell the products, there must be some rational connection between the facilities furnished for food consumption and the person selling the food. If the facilities are located some distance away from the retailer, are owned by persons other than the retailer, and are provided primarily for the general use of park patrons, the fact that the retailer's customers use the facilities to consume food products bought at the retailer's stand is not sufficient to constitute "facilities" under sub-division (f). What this "boils down to" is that it must be shown with some certainty that the benches, tables, and chairs are provided for the purpose of consumption of the food. From your description, it appears that the benches, tables, and chairs are provided for the purpose of eating the food bought at the stands in the park. They seem to be in close proximity to the food sales operations. Food is sold, but not on a to-go basis, so it must be consumed somewhere. Park patrons might also bring their own food (you do not indicate if that is permitted) and consume it on the benches, tables, and chairs, but if that happens it is likely a result of the benches being there, not the purpose for their placement. We thus conclude that there is a rational connection between the food-selling operations and the benches, tables, and chairs so as to constitute them as "facilities" within the meaning of Regulation 1603(f). The food products sold are suitable for consumption at those facilities. Sales of food within the park are thus subject to tax even if the patrons buy food at the stands and then take it to other areas of the park to eat.

JLW:te

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace