Were a one-time community-antenna installation fee and monthly television-signal service charge taxable when all equipment remained company property?

Short answer No. The company consumed the wire, poles, and equipment; subscriber charges were services rather than sales or rentals of property.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 515.0940
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1966-08-23
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Counsel for a community-antenna television company (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1966. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1966
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel opinion dated August 23, 1966, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It relies on company ownership of all wire, poles, and equipment and the then-new section 6016.5 treatment of communication lines as real property for sales-and-use-tax purposes. Another cable or communications provider should check current installation, equipment, line, real-property, rental, subscription, signal, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A community-antenna television company installed wire, poles, and equipment, retained ownership of everything, charged subscribers a one-time installation fee, and collected monthly fees for providing television signals.

California treated the company as the consumer of its materials and equipment, so tax applied when it bought them.

The subscriber installation and monthly service charges were not taxable because they did not represent sales of property. The arrangement also was not treated as a rental.

The source linked this treatment to section 6016.5's prospective reclassification of telephone, telegraph, and other communication lines from personal property to real property.

What this means for you

Cable and communications providers

Retained equipment ownership and service-based subscriber charges supported consumer treatment rather than resale or rental.

Accountants and tax professionals

Document equipment title, installation, real-property classification, monthly services, rentals, customer possession, and component purchases.

Common questions

Q: Was the installation fee taxable?

A: No.

Q: Was the monthly signal fee taxable?

A: No.

Q: Who consumed the equipment?

A: The community-antenna company.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6016.5

Source

Original ruling text

515.0940

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

August 23, 1966
Mr. W--- J. A--Attorney at law
C--- & A--XXX West XXth Street
---, CA XXXXX

G--- E--- C--- Corp.
Community Antenna Television

Dear Mr. A---:
Your letter of July 29, 1966, to our district office, has been referred to this office for reply. It appears from the facts set forth that your client, G--- E--- C--- Corporation, is properly regarded as the consumer under sales and use tax ruling 11, copy enclosed, of all of the wire, poles, and other equipment with which it installs a community antenna television system. Thus, sales tax would apply to the sale of such materials and equipment to your client. There is no resale in view of your statement that all of the equipment remains the property of the company, no equipment being sold to the subscriber. The one-time fee charged to the subscriber for installation, and the monthly service charge of providing television signals, is not taxable as it does not represent, as we understand it, a charge for tangible personal property. We would not regard this as in the nature of a rental. As far as we are aware, the foregoing represents the basic application of the tax that has been followed, at least since September 17, 1965, the effective date of § 6016.5 of the Sales and Use Tax Law. This section changed the status of telephone and telegraph lines, which has been interpreted to include lines for the transmission of other types of communication, from personal property to real property for purposes of the Sales and Use Tax Law. See the history note following the section regarding its prospective application. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:fb
Enclosure
cc:
Sacramento – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1966. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace