Who reports a furniture sale when a wholesaler fills an order for a retailer, delivers directly to the customer, and collects the price?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1958. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California treated the retail dealer—not the furniture wholesaler—as the seller to the customer under the documented arrangement. The dealer sent a customer to the wholesaler, the wholesaler showed and shipped the item, collected a price that included both its wholesale amount and the dealer's profit, kept the wholesale amount, and remitted the balance to the dealer. The invoice identified the dealer as buyer and the customer as consignee, and copies went to both.
Because that invoice showed the sale to the dealer and reflected the parties' understanding, the Board concluded that the wholesaler transferred the merchandise and collected payment on the dealer's behalf. For future transactions, the wholesaler should take a resale certificate from the dealer, send the sales-tax reimbursement to the dealer, and stop reporting the customer's full payment as its own taxable gross receipts.
The Board did not reopen the wholesaler's past treatment. It accepted transactions already reported as the wholesaler's taxable sales.
Common questions
Did direct shipment from the wholesaler to the customer make the wholesaler the retailer?
No. On these facts, the invoice and the parties' arrangement showed that the dealer was the retailer and the wholesaler acted for the dealer during delivery and collection.
What records did the letter require for future resale treatment?
The wholesaler was to accept a resale certificate from the dealer and treat the dealer as its resale customer.
Who was to receive and report the sales-tax reimbursement?
The wholesaler was to remit it to the dealer rather than keep it and report the customer's full payment as the wholesaler's taxable sale.
Were earlier transactions changed?
No. The Board accepted them as previously reported.
Citations and references
- No numbered statute, regulation, or case citation appears in the official source
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/495-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/495-0980.pdf
Original ruling text
495.0980
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
August 25, 1958
X---------------------------
Your letter of June 26
Dear Mr. X-----------------:
As we understand the facts, it appears that your client is a furniture wholesaler and that he is regularly engaged in the business of selling furniture to retail dealers. However, in many cases where a dealer does not stock an item desired by a customer, he sends the customer to your client who in turn undertakes to show the customer the item or items desired. If the customer desires to purchase an item, your client ships said item from his warehouse directly to the customer and receives payment therefore from said customer. The payment made to your client includes his wholesale price plus the profit desired by the dealer. Upon receiving the payment, your client retains so much thereof as constitutes his wholesale price and remits the balance to the dealer who sent the customer. The invoice sent out by your client shows the merchandise in question as being sold to the dealer and consigned to the customer. The problem presented is whether this transaction constitutes a sale to the dealer for resale to the customer or a retail sale directly by your client to the customer sent by the dealer. In view of the fact that your client's invoice, which is the only document evidencing the transaction, shows that the sale is made to the dealer and that copies of this invoice are given both to the customer and dealer, it is fair to conclude that it is the understanding of all of the parties that the dealer is the retail seller and that in transferring the merchandise to the customer and accepting payment therefore your client is acting on behalf of the dealer. The past transactions, where your client has kept the sales tax reimbursement and reported the sales as part of his taxable gross receipts, will be accepted as reported. However, in order to be consistent with this position, your client in the future should in all such cases remit the sales tax reimbursement to the dealer and accept a resale
certificate from him rather than retain the sales tax reimbursement and report the gross receipts as part of his taxable sales on his own return. Very truly yours,
Stanley G. Lerner
Assistant Counsel
SGL:fb
cc:
Los Angeles – Administrator
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1958. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace