Did a wholesaler make taxable retail sales when it gave records to radio stations at a supplier's request and received replacement records?

Short answer Yes. California upheld treating the radio-station distributions as taxable retail sales even though the stations paid nothing.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 495.0950
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1972-06-07
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board staff reviewing a wholesale record dealer's radio-station distributions

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1972. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1972
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This brief 1972 internal memorandum addressed records a wholesaler distributed free to radio stations at its supplier's request under an understanding that the supplier would replace them. It upheld the audit treatment and measure without stating the amount or calculation in the source. Current promotional-distribution, consideration, replacement-inventory, sales-tax, and use-tax rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A wholesale record dealer distributed records to radio stations at its supplier's request. Neither the dealer nor the supplier charged the stations, but the supplier agreed to furnish replacement records to the dealer.

California upheld the audit's treatment of those distributions as taxable retail sales by the dealer. It also said the audit's measure of tax was appropriate, although the short source does not state the measure or its calculation.

The memorandum noted that inconsistent treatment in earlier audits of the supplier did not change the proper application of tax to the transactions under review.

Common questions

Did the stations' lack of payment prevent a taxable sale?

No under the described replacement arrangement.

What did the dealer receive?

The supplier was understood to furnish replacement records for those distributed to the stations.

Does the source disclose the taxable measure?

No. It only states that the measure used in the audit was appropriate.

Citations and references

  • No numbered statute, regulation, or case citation appears in the official source

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

Mr. J. J. Saunders

From:

T. P. Putnam

Subject:

X-------------------------

495.0950

Date:

June 7, 1972

In reply to your memorandum of May 31, it is my view that the audit treatment of X--------------- is correct, i.e., X------------- is making taxable retail sales of those records distributed to radio stations at X--------------- request, without any charge to the radio stations, and with the understanding that X------------ will furnish replacement records. The measure of tax used in the audit is appropriate. It is unfortunate if the transactions were not treated consistently with the above approach in prior audits of X-------------- but that should not affect the proper application of tax.

TPP:kc
cc:

Mr. R. Nunes
Mr. J. D. Paulson
Out-of-State Auditing (DMA)
San Mateo Auditing (CPL)

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1972. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace