Could manufacturers buy transfer film for resale when all of one product transferred, but another left a plastic backing as waste?

Short answer Yes for both. One film transferred entirely, and the other's primary purpose was to incorporate its pattern into the finished product despite leaving backing residue.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 440.1897
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1993-11-23
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An adviser to a transfer-film manufacturer asking whether two film products sold to other manufacturers qualified for resale

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1993
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is a California State Board of Equalization staff-counsel letter dated November 23, 1993, published by CDTFA as support for a sales and use tax annotation. It depends on the described films being bought primarily to incorporate their designs or material into products for resale and on the seller accepting timely, valid resale certificates. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current transfer-film, component-part, residue, primary-purpose, manufacturing-aid, resale-certificate, and sales-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A company sold two plastic transfer-film products to manufacturers. Product 1 transferred its film, lettering, and designs entirely into the customer's manufactured item. Product 2 transferred the pattern but left a patternless plastic backing that was peeled off and discarded.

Product 1 qualified for resale because it became an ingredient or component of the manufactured product. Product 2 also qualified: although a substantial backing remained, the manufacturer's primary purpose in buying it was to incorporate the pattern into the article sold, not to use the backing as a manufacturing aid.

The seller could sell both products without tax when it accepted timely, valid resale certificates from manufacturers buying them for those stated uses.

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1525 (as cited)
  • Business Taxes Law Guide Annotations 440.0860, 440.1220, 440.1300, and 440.1780 (as cited)
  • Kaiser Steel Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1979) 24 Cal.3d 188

Source

Original ruling text

440.1897

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 445-2641

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

November 23, 1993

────────
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

Mr. T—H---- & --XX --- Street
--- ---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

N--- P--- Company, Ltd.
XXXX --- Street, Suite XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX

Dear Mr. H---:
This is in response to your letter of August 31, 1993, which requested our opinion on the application of sales tax to sales by your client, N--- P--- Company, of plastic pattern transfer film to manufacturers. Your questions concerned whether the tangible personal property was to be purchased for use in the manufacturing process, or was to be purchased for incorporation into the finished product being manufactured. You state as follows: "The client manufactures two types of film. The first product (hereafter designated as Product 1) is a film with lettering and designs on it. This film is transferred to products in its entirety with no plastic residue. The second product (hereafter designated as Product 2) has a pattern imprinted on the film which is transferred to a product leaving the patternless film as a residue. Samples of both types of film are enclosed. "Our clients sell the film to manufacturers. The manufacturers incorporate the patterns into products that they produce. These manufacturers then sell the finished products. We believe that both film products may be purchased from our client for resale by manufacturers because they are both physically incorporated into the products produced by the manufacturers.

Mr. T--- H---

-2-

November 23,
1993 440.1897

"Product 1-Film with No Residue
"Product 1 is a plastic film with patterns and/or lettering imprinted upon it. The samples of Product 1 are a clear plastic film with dots and the word 'C---' imprinted upon it and a plastic container lid with bow patterns and the words 'S--'n W---' imprinted upon it. As you can see from the plastic lid, Product 1 is imprinted in its entirety on the lid. This includes the plastic film as well as the patterns and words. Under Regulation 1525(b), sales tax does not apply to the sales of tangible personal property to persons who purchase it for the purpose of incorporating it into manufactured articles to be sold. Therefore, if customers provide resale certificate, sales tax should not apply to sales of Product 1. "Product 2-Film with Plastic Residue "Product 2 is also a plastic film with patterns imprinted upon it. The samples of Product 2 are two plastic laminate plates. One plate has a role of Product 2 carrying a wood grain pattern taped to it. The second plate has the wood grain pattern imprinted upon its with the film residue taped in place. Normally, after imprinting, the film residue would be peeled off and thrown away. Through the hole cut in the plate, you can see and feel the texture of the pattern which is transferred. It has thickness and its own texture. Under Regulation 1525(b), sales tax does not apply to the sale of tangible personal property to persons who purchase its for the purposes of incorporating it into manufactured articles to be sold. However, Regulation 1525(a) states that tax applies to tangible personal property sold to persons who purchase it for the purpose of use in the manufacturing process. "In this case, Product 2 is partially incorporated into the finished product for resale. That is, the pattern is incorporated into the product. However, the film backing of the pattern does not become incorporated...." "In addition, we believe that it is important to note that no portion of Product 2 acts as a catalyst, processing agent or any other type of manufacturing aid. The sole purpose of the product is to incorporate the pattern into manufacturing products." Regulation 1525(b) provides as follows: "Tax does not apply to sales of tangible personal property to persons who purchase it for the purpose of incorporating it into the manufactured article to be

Mr. T--- H---

-3-

November 23,
1993 440.1897

sold, as, for example, any raw material becoming an ingredient or component part of the manufactured article." From the facts presented by you, it is our opinion that Product 1 will be incorporated into the finished product. It is a raw material which is purchased by your client's customers "for the purpose of incorporating it into the manufactured article to be sold...." and which entirely becomes "an ingredient or component part of the manufactured article." (Reg. 1525(b).) Your client may therefore sell the property extax by accepting timely and valid resale certificates. Product 2 is not purchased to be entirely incorporated into the manufactured article. A substantial portion is left over after the manufacturing process as plastic residue. However, both the Sales and Use Tax Annotations, going back to the 1950's, and the California appellate cases have looked at the principal reason for the purchase of the property. (Annot. 440.0860, 440.1220, 440.1300, 440.1780.) This has evolved into the "primary purpose" test. (Kaiser Steel Corp. v. SBE (1979) 24 Cal 3d 188.) It is our opinion that the primary purpose for a manufacturer to purchase Product 2 from your client is to incorporate a portion of the product into the articles to be manufactured for resale. Your client may sell Product 2 to such a manufacturer extax for resale by accepting a timely and valid resale certificate. If you have other questions, please contact me. Sincerely yours,

Donald L. Fillman
Staff Counsel
DLF:wk

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace