Was recording motion pictures onto customer-owned video-tape cartridges a taxable sale or the recorder's use of the tapes?

Short answer California treated the recording and delivery as taxable fabrication or processing sales, not as the recording company's use of the customer-owned tapes.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 435.1745
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1978-10-16
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A Board district official asking about a company's video-tape agreements with airlines

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1978. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1978
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an internal California State Board of Equalization legal mini-memorandum dated October 16, 1978, published by CDTFA as support for Annotation 435.1745. The memorandum does not print the annotation number, but CDTFA's official Video Tape annotation links directly to it and the date, parties, transaction, and holding align with the annotation. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding and should check current video-recording, customer-owned-property, fabrication, processing, airline, and sales-and-use-tax rules. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Recording motion pictures onto video-tape cartridges owned by airline customers, then delivering the recorded cartridges back to those airlines, was a taxable sale by the recording company under section 6006(b) as then cited.

The Board did not treat the transaction as the recording company's taxable use of the customer-owned tapes under section 6006(g)(2). The taxable activity was the company's recording, fabrication, or processing service performed on tangible personal property.

The supporting mini-memorandum does not print Annotation 435.1745, but CDTFA's official annotation page links this exact PDF and describes the same October 16, 1978 video-tape transaction and holding.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6006(b) and 6006(g)(2) (as cited)

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF
CALIFORNIA

MINI-MEMO

TO:

SUBJECT:

DATE:

Walt Pagel
Pasadena District Office

B--- & H--- Video-tape
agreements with airlines

10/16/78

STD 100-B (REV. 9-7

M
E
S
S
A
G
E

This is to confirm our telephone conversation today that B--- & H---’s recording of motion pictures on videotape cartridges owned by its airline customers, and delivery of those cartridges to the airlines are Sec. 6006(b) sales by B--- & H--- rather than Sec. 6006(g)(2) uses of the tapes by B--- & H---.

RETURN TO

SIGNED

ADDRESS

PHONE

Philip R. Dougherty

Legal

485-2705

R
E
P
L
Y

SIGNED

ADDRESS

DATE

SEND PARTS 1 AND 3 INTACT – PART 3 WILL BE RETURNED WITH REPLY

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1978. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace