Were a cold-type service's transfers to commercial and in-plant printers taxable?

Short answer No. California treated the service as a typographer transferring composed type or reproduction proofs for preparing printed matter, so none of the described charges were taxable.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 430.0360
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1968-11-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A cold-type service using an IBM Composer and Headliner machine for printers and in-plant print shops

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1968. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1968
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1968 staff letter addressed an early cold-type service using an IBM Composer, a Headliner machine for larger display type, and ruled forms with small headings. Both customer groups photographed the work to make printing plates; one resold printing and the other used its printing internally. Current cold-type, digital-output, composed-type, reproduction-proof, printing, in-plant, resale, and sales-tax rules control today.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A cold-type service used an IBM Composer to type customer copy, a Headliner machine for display type larger than 12 point, and ruled forms into which it typed small headings. Its customers were commercial printers reselling the resulting printing and in-plant print shops using their own printing internally.

California classified the business as a typographer fabricating and transferring composed type or reproduction proofs for use in preparing printed matter.

Under section 6010.3, none of the described charges to either customer group were taxable. The customer's resale or internal-use status did not change the exclusion for the typographer's qualifying transfer.

Common questions

Were charges to in-plant print shops taxable because they used the printing themselves?

No. The letter said none of the charges to either described customer group were taxable.

Did the pasted-on display head prevent typography treatment?

No under the facts stated in the letter.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6010.3
  • Historical Sales and Use Tax Ruling 24
  • Former Business Taxes General Bulletin 62-3

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

430.0360

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
November 21, 1968

Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter of November 6, 1968 addressed to Mr. H. A. Bindman. We understand that you have a cold type service. You use an IBM composer, which resembles a Selectric typewriter, to type your customer's copy on a piece of paper. When a type size that is larger than 12 point is needed, you set the "display head" on a Headliner machine and paste that on the copy. You also rule forms and then place them in the Composer to type in the small headings. You have two types of customers: (1) printers, who photograph your work and then make a plate, print from the plate, and sell the printing to their customers; and (2) inplant print shops who do the same thing with your work but use the subsequent printing in their own plants. You have been marking invoices for group (1) "for resale", and collecting tax from group (2). On these facts, your status is that of a typographer who is fabricating and transferring composed type or reproduction proofs for use in the preparation of printed matter. In accordance with Section 6010.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, such a fabrication and transfer is not a sale for purposes of the Sales and Use Tax Law. Accordingly, none of your charges to any of the customers described above are taxable. Although Section 6010.3 was only recently enacted, it reflects our previous interpretation of how the tax applies to operations such as yours. For additional information, we are enclosing a copy of Section 6010.3, a copy of Ruling 24, and a copy of Business Taxes General Bulletin 62.3. Very truly yours,

T. P. Putnam
Tax Counsel
TPP:kc [lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1968. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace