Were speech pathologists consumers of fitted speech aids, or retailers required to hold seller's permits?

Short answer They were retailers. California said no statute made speech pathologists consumers, so their marked-up patient sales were taxable and required seller's permits; the manufacturer could sell for resale.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0828
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-07-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Manufacturer selling professionally fitted speech devices to speech pathologists

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This July 15, 1994 opinion concerned a speech device that a pathologist professionally fitted and resold at a markup. It concluded that speech pathologists were not statutory consumers and that the device was excluded from medicine; it did not decide unrelated professional services or every modern speech-assistance product. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Product function, invoicing, title transfer, resale documentation, licensing rules, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The manufacturer sold a speech device that helped people who stutter speak more fluently. A speech pathologist professionally fitted the instrument and marked up its price to the patient.

California rejected the idea that the manufacturer's transfer to the pathologist was automatically the taxable retail sale. The speech aid was a taxable appliance or device, and no statute designated a speech pathologist as its consumer.

The pathologist therefore made the taxable retail sale to the patient, had to hold a California seller's permit, and had to report the sale. The manufacturer could sell the device for resale by timely accepting a qualifying resale certificate.

Common questions

Did professional fitting make the pathologist the consumer?

No. The opinion required a statute creating consumer status, and found none.

Could the manufacturer sell the device without tax?

Yes, as a sale for resale supported by a timely compliant resale certificate.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 — sales tax on retail sales
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591 — medicine framework
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(c)(2) — appliances and devices excluded from medicine
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668 — resale-certificate requirements

Source

Original ruling text

425.0828

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

MEMBER
First District

1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001
TELEPHONE (916) 920 - 7445

BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG,
JR.
Third District, San Diego
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento

July 15, 1994

BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director

X----------------------------

Re:

X----------------------------Speech Pathology Devices

Dear X------------------------,
I am responding to your letter to the Legal Division dated May 18, 1994. You ask if the speech pathologists who are your company's customers must obtain seller's permits to dispense the device your company makes and sells. You indicate that your company manufactures a speech device which assists stutterers to speak more fluently. The device must be professionally fit by a speech pathologist who marks up the cost of the instrument. You indicate that you spoke to someone at the "state department" (presumably a Board office), who indicated that this situation was similar to sales to hearing aid dispensers in that the sale to the purchasing pathologist was a taxable retail sale so that the pathologist's sale to his patient was not subject to tax. The pathologist, then, would not be required to possess a seller's permit. OPINION A.

Sales and Use Tax Generally.

In California, except where specifically exempted by statute, Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6051 imposes an excise tax, computed as a percentage of gross receipts, upon all retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail in this state. (Unless otherwise stated, all statutory references are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.) Section 6369, interpreted and implemented by Title 28, California Code of Regulations, Regulation 1591, provides that sales of medicine, when prescribed and sold or furnished under certain conditions for the treatment of a human being, are exempt from sales or use tax. (Reg. 1591(a).) Subdivision (b) (1) defines "medicine" to "mean and include any substance or preparation intended for use by external or internal application to the human body in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and which is commonly recognized as a substance or preparation intended for such use." However, Regulation 1591(c) (2) adds that "medicines" do not include "articles which are in the nature of splints, bandages, pads, compresses, supports, dressings, instruments,

apparatus, contrivances, appliances, devices, or other mechanical, electronic, optical or physical equipment or article or the component parts and accessories thereof." (Sales and Use Tax Regulations are Board promulgations which have the force and effect of law.) As a rule, then, items used to diagnose a condition or to apply medicine or treatment to the patient are not considered to be medicines. C.

Tax Consequences.

We have previously determined that speech aids are appliances or devices excluded from the definition of "medicines" under Regulation 1591(c) (2). No statute designates a speech pathologist as a statutory consumer. Therefore, the understanding of the person with whom you spoke is incorrect. Speech pathologists' sales of such speech aids are subject to tax, and they are required to possess seller's permits in California. Your company may sell the devices free of tax by timely accepting from its buyers resale certificates substantially conforming to the requirements of Regulation 1668. For your information, I have included copies of Regulations 1591 and 1668. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,

John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
Encs: Regs. 1591, 1668
Cc:

OH – District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace