Did the OvuSTICK home ovulation test qualify as exempt medicine?

Short answer No. California taxed it because predicting ovulation did not diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0619
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1986-04-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A manufacturer of medical diagnostic kits

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This April 15, 1986 staff opinion addressed an in-home urine test used to predict ovulation. The request described prescription-only sales, while the product literature described it as nonprescription; the staff said the medicine result was the same either way. Current fertility-test law controls.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the OvuSTICK home urine test as taxable. The kit helped the user predict ovulation, but that function did not diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease and therefore did not meet the historical medicine definition.

The source contained conflicting prescription status information: the requester called it prescription-only, while the literature called it nonprescription. California concluded that the product was taxable either way. A physician purchase was also taxable unless supported by a valid resale certificate.

Common questions

Did sale through a physician make OvuSTICK exempt?

No. The product itself did not qualify as medicine.

Could a physician buy it for resale?

Yes if the seller timely accepted a valid resale certificate in good faith.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(a) and (b) and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591 — medicine framework
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6091 and 6092 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668 — resale-certificate treatment
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 — general sales-tax rule

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

425.0619

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-322-3684
April 15, 1986
X---------------------Dear X----------------------,

Your letter of March 12, 1986 has been referred to me for a response. You request our opinion concerning the correct application of tax to the sale of “OvuSTICK Self Test” to physicians. You enclosed with your letter some literature and brochures describing the product. Your letter indicates that X--------------------- is a manufacturer of Medical Diagnostic Kits. One such kit is an ovulation product called “OvuSTICK Self Test”. This product is an in-home diagnostic kit that is a simple urine test to aid the user in predicting the time of ovulation. Your letter indicates that the product is sold by prescription only; however, the attached literature indicates that “OvuSTICK” is a nonprescription product. In any event, X-------------- sells the product to pharmacies and physicians. You request a definite determination as to whether the sale of “OvuSTICK Self Test” is taxable. Further, it is your understanding that X-------------- sales to physicians are taxable unless the physician furnishes a resale tax number. Unless otherwise exempt by statute, section 6051 of the Revenue and Taxation Code imposes a retail tax on all retailers for the privilege of selling tangible personal property within the State of California. Pursuant to section 6091 and 6092 and Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1668, which interprets and applies the code, a retail seller will be relieved of sales tax liability if a timely resale certificate is taken from the purchaser in good faith. In addition, section 6369(a) and Regulation 159 exempt from tax the sale of medicines, as defined. Medicines is defined in section 6369(b) to mean and include “…any substance or preparation intended for use by external or internal application to the human body in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease….” (emphasis added) Applying the foregoing criteria, we are of the opinion that “OvuSTICK” is not a medicine the sale of which is exempt from tax. As described, “OvuSTICK” is a product used to predict the time of ovulation. “OvuSTICK” is not used to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat or prevent a disease. Therefore, the sale of “OvuSTICK” is taxable.

Finally, you are correct in your understanding that unless the physician purchasing “OvuSTICK” provides X----------- with a resale certificate as described in section 6091 and 6092 and Regulation 1668, the sale is taxable. We hope the above information is helpful. Enclosed for your review and reference is a copy of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591 (Prescription Medicines_ and 1668 (Resale Certificates). If you have any further questions on this topic, please do not hesitate to write this office. Very truly yours,

Robert J. Stipe
Tax Counsel
RJS:sr
Encs.
Cc:

San Jose District Office
Compliance

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1986. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace