Did an attendant-operated Lumex three-position recliner qualify as an exempt wheelchair?

Short answer No. California taxed it because the patient could not operate it for meaningful mobility and the wheels mainly helped attendants place the chair.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0494
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1986-03-24
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A seller asking whether a Lumex recliner was a wheelchair

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This March 24, 1986 staff opinion addressed a Lumex three-position recliner whose brakes and movement required an attendant. It classified the wheels as facilitating chair placement rather than independent user mobility. Current product design and law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the Lumex three-position recliner as taxable rather than as an exempt wheelchair. The chair had rear casters and front wheels, but the patient could not release the brakes or operate it alone; an attendant had to move it.

The source found that the wheels primarily helped place the chair rather than allowing the user to move independently from one point to another. It therefore classified the recliner as taxable apparatus or mechanical equipment.

Common questions

Did having wheels make the recliner a wheelchair?

No. California focused on whether the device assisted the user in self-mobility.

Did patient comfort or medical use create a medicine exemption?

No. The chair remained physical equipment excluded from medicine.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369.2 — wheelchair and mobility-device exemption discussed in the letter
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(b)(2) — physical equipment exclusion
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6051 — general sales-tax rule

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

425.0494

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
916-322-3684
March 24, 1986
X-------------------------

Dear Mrs. X-------------------,
Your February 18, 1986 letter to Mr. Larry Cutler has been referred to me for a response. You inquire whether the sale of a particular “orthopedic chair” is exempt from tax as a “wheelchair”. You have enclosed an attachment that pictures and describes the chair. The attachment describes the chair as a “Lumex” 3-position recliner with specially designed features for all day patient comfort. Attached to the rear legs of the chair are two five-inch ball bearing swivel casters with brakes and attached to the front legs of the chair are two five-inch fixed wheels. The attachment indicates the casters and wheels allow for easy maneuverability for transport. Finally, you indicate in your letter that “the chair can only be operated from the rear by an attendant…(and)…the brakes cannot be released by the patient….” Except where the sales are specifically exempted by statute, sales tax applies to all retail sales of tangible personal property in this state (Rev. & Tax. Code §6051). Section 63699(a) of the Code exempts from tax the sale of medicines as defined. Section 6369(b)(2) provides that the term “medicines” does not include “articles which are in the nature of…apparatus, contrivances,…devices, or other mechanical…equipment….” In addition, section 6369.2 exempts from tax the sale of “wheelchairs, crutches, canes, quad canes, and walkers….” Applying the preceding criteria to the “Lumex” chair described in your letter and the attachment, we are of the opinion that the sale of the chair is not exempt from tax pursuant to section 6369.2. Section 6369.2 describes items that assist their users as they move themselves from one point to another. The chair de4scribed in your letter and the attachment is not designed to be operated by the user alone to achieve any significant mobility. A second person, or attendant, is needed before the chair can function as a means of movement from one point to another. Additionally, it appears the function of the five-inch wheels and casters are designed primarily to facilitate the placement of the chair and not to assist the mobility of the user. In brief, the “Lumex” three-position recliner does not assist the user to move him or herself from one point to another.

Therefore, the sale of the “Lumex” chair is not exempt as a wheelchair since it does not perform the same function as a wheelchair. It is our opinion that the chair can more accurately be described as an article which is in the nature of an apparatus, contrivance, device or other mechanical piece of equipment and therefore expressly excluded from the definition of “medicine” pursuant to section 6369(b)(2). Therefore, since the sale of the chair is not exempt pursuant to any exemption in the Revenue and Taxation Code, its sale is taxable pursuant to section 6051. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to write this office. Very truly yours,

Robert J. Stipe
Tax Counsel
RJS:sr
Cc:

San Francisco Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1986. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace