Did the Amigo Deluxe and Hoveround three-wheel mobility devices qualify as wheelchairs?

Short answer Yes. California treated the two models as motorized wheelchairs, making an individual user's purchase exempt when for personal use as directed by a licensed physician.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.1060
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1995-12-15
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board return-analysis staff reviewing personal-mobility equipment

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1995
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This December 15, 1995 internal memorandum classified the brochure-described Amigo Deluxe and Hoveround models under then-current wheelchair rules. It expressly required case-by-case review of other personal-mobility equipment and warned that visually similar motorized products might not qualify. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Model function, purchaser, personal use, physician direction, product changes, and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Amigo Deluxe and Hoveround were three-wheel electric mobility devices used indoors and outdoors for the same activities as conventional wheelchairs.

California treated both models as motorized wheelchairs. A sale to an individual was exempt when made for that individual's personal use as directed by a licensed physician.

Common questions

Did any prescription make durable medical equipment exempt?

No. The equipment first had to fit a specific statutory exemption.

Did every motorized mobility device qualify as a wheelchair?

No. The memorandum required model-by-model review and said similar-looking equipment might not qualify.

What conditions applied to these two models?

Sale to an individual, for that individual's personal use, as directed by a licensed physician.

Citations and references

  • Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6369 and 6369.2 — medicines and historical wheelchair exemption
  • 18 Cal. Code Regs. § 1591(c)(2), (k) — durable medical equipment and wheelchairs

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

L. P. Salcedo
Return Analysis Section (MIC:35)

From:

Kelly W. Ching
Staff Counsel

Subject:

X-------------------------

425.1060

Date:

December 15, 1995

This is in response to your memorandum dated October 10, 1995 regarding the application of tax to sales of durable medical equipment. You state: "The taxpayer has been exempting from tax computation the durable medical equipment which has been purchased with a prescription. "Does the durable medical equipment described by the enclosed brochures qualify as exempt medical devices?" The brochures attached to your memorandum describe two pieces of personal mobility equipment, the "Amigo Deluxe" and the "Hoveround." Both products are described as being meant for indoor as well as outdoor use. People are pictured sitting in the models as they perform activities such as working in an office, collecting mail from a mailbox, relaxing outdoors, and exiting a van using a ramp. DISCUSSION As you know, retail sales of tangible personal property in California are subject to sales tax, measured by gross receipts, unless specifically exempt from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051.) Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6369 and 6369.2 provide the exemptions relevant to answering your question. As explained in Regulation 1591, section 6369 provides that sales of medicine, when prescribed and sold or furnished under certain conditions for the treatment of a human being, are exempt from sales tax. (Reg.1591(a).) Subdivision (b)(l) of Regulation 1591 defines "medicine" to "mean and include any substance or preparation intended for use by external or internal application to the human body in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of

disease and which is commonly recognized as a substance or preparation intended for such use." However, Regulation 1591 (c) (2) adds that "medicines" do not include "articles which are in the nature of splints, bandages, pads, compresses, supports, dressings, instruments, apparatus, contrivances, appliances, devices, or other mechanical, electronic, optical or physical equipment or article or the component parts and accessories thereof." Since an article of durable medical equipment is in the nature of an appliance, device, or other mechanical, electronic, or physical piece of equipment, it is not a medicine under section 6369; therefore, sales of such articles are not exempt from tax under section 6369. However, as explained in subdivision (k) of Regulation 1591, section 6369.2 provides that tax does not apply to sales of wheelchairs when sold to an individual for the personal use of that individual as directed by a licensed physician. We have previously concluded that electric three-wheel devices similar to the personal mobility models pictured and described in the brochures you provided are essentially motorized wheelchairs. It appears from the pictures and descriptions in the brochures that the models at issue here are used for the same purposes as the purposes for which wheelchairs are used; therefore, they also qualify as wheelchairs. This means that when either the "Amigo Deluxe" or the "Hoveround" is sold to an individual for that individual's personal use as directed by a licensed physician, sales to that individual of either of those models would be exempt from tax under section 6369.2. With respect to any other model of personal mobility equipment, we would need to consider each model on a case-by-case basis in order to determine whether or not it would qualify as a wheelchair the sale of which would be exempt from tax under section 6369.2. Other motorized pieces of equipment that appear similar to those at issue here might include devices which would not be considered wheelchairs. The sales of motorized pieces of equipment not considered wheelchairs would not be exempt from tax under section 6369.2. If you have further questions, please feel free to write again. KWC:cl Cc:

X-------------- District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace