Were hypodermic needles and syringes exempt medicines after California's 1983 law change?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California legal staff said intravenous sets, syringes, and needles generally did not qualify as exempt medicines under the cited rule. A statutory amendment effective January 1, 1983 created a narrower result for insulin syringes.
Under the memorandum, an insulin syringe qualified when a registered pharmacist furnished it to a person for diabetes treatment as directed by a physician. The document proposed amending the existing annotation to reflect that change in law.
Common questions
Were intravenous sets, syringes, and needles generally exempt?
No.
Which syringes did the memorandum identify as exempt?
Insulin syringes furnished by a registered pharmacist to a person for diabetes treatment as directed by a physician.
Did the 1984 memorandum create the rule itself?
No. It described a 1982 enactment effective January 1, 1983 and proposed updating the older annotation.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6365 — general rule cited for nonexempt intravenous sets, syringes, and needles
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369(e) — insulin-syringe amendment described in the memorandum
- AB 3195 (1982), Chapter 1589 — legislation identified as making the amendment
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/425-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/425-0420.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Memorandum
To:
Mr. D. J. Hennessy
From:
Charles J. Graziano
Subject:
Annotation 425.0420
425.0420
Date:
April 10, 1984
Pursuant to your request, I have prepared the attached draft of DTLG Annotation 425.0420 for your approval. Generally, intravenous sets, syringes, and needles do not qualify as exempt medicines under Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6365. Effective January 1, 1983, however, Section 6369(e) was amended [AB 3195, Ch. 1589, Stats. 1982] to provide that insulin syringes qualify as exempt prescription medicines when furnished by a registered pharmacist to a person for the treatment of diabetes as directed by a physician. Therefore, Annotation 425.0420 should be amended to reflect this change in law.
CJG:ba
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace