Were prescribed disposable adult diapers and pant-and-pad systems exempt as medicines in California?

Short answer No. California treated the described incontinence supplies as taxable because a prescription did not turn products excluded from medicine into exempt medicines.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0325
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1984-02-29
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Medical-supply seller specializing in incontinence products

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1984. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1984
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The supporting opinion is dated February 29, 1984; the annotation carried a later 1992 date, so this page uses the source letter's own date. The annotation summary identifies Regulation 1591(c)(2), while the official supporting letter says paragraph (c)(3); this page preserves and discloses that conflict rather than resolving it. CDTFA says statutory law controls if it conflicts with an annotation. Product classification and current law can change the result.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the described disposable adult diapers and pant-and-pad systems as taxable. Although the customer had a doctor's prescription, the opinion said a prescription exempts only an item that first qualifies as “medicine” under Regulation 1591.

The incontinence supplies did not qualify as medicine under the regulatory exclusion cited in the source letter. The opinion contrasted them with products such as petroleum jelly, rubbing alcohol, or medical oxygen, which could qualify as medicines and become exempt when purchased under a physician's order.

Common questions

Did the doctor's prescription by itself create an exemption?

No. The product also had to meet the regulation's definition of medicine.

Does the official material consistently identify the same subsection?

No. The annotation summary points to Regulation 1591(c)(2), while the supporting opinion says paragraph (c)(3).

Citations and references

  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b) — items classified as medicines
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(c)(3) — exclusion cited in the February 29, 1984 supporting opinion; the annotation summary instead identifies subdivision (c)(2)

Source

Original ruling text

425.0325

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

916-445-3723
February 29, 1984
Dear Begin deleted text REDACTED TEXT End deleted text, This is in reply to your letter of February 14, 1984. We understand that your company sells medical supplies. You specialize in incontinent supplies; that is, disposable adult diapers, pant and pad systems, etc. You have recently received an order from a woman with MS. She has a doctor's prescription for your product, and she said that it was her understanding that she would not have to pay tax. You have assumed that, even with a prescription, sales tax is required. Our Regulation 1591, "Prescription “medicines” provides that sales tax does not apply to sales of items classified as "medicines" under paragraph (b) of the regulation, if the medicines are sold on a prescription basis. It is true that the exemption applies to a number of items such as vaseline, rubbing alcohol or medical oxygen which can typically be purchased without prescription. However, these items meet the definition of the term "medicines,” and thus if they are bought in accordance with the order of a physician and surgeon the sale is exempt. Incontinent supplies of the type in question, however, do not come within the definition of the term "medicine." The items in question are excluded from "medicines" under paragraph (c) (3) of the regulation. Accordingly, tax applies to the sale of the items in question notwithstanding the fact that they are sold on a prescription basis. Very truly yours,

Gary J. Jugum
Assistant Chief Counsel
GJJ/jkr

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1984. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace