Was a leg strap used to secure an indwelling Foley catheter exempt from California sales tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1993. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California exempted the described leg strap. It secured an indwelling Foley catheter to the patient's upper thigh without tourniquet action and replaced the need for tape.
The opinion said Foley catheters had already been determined exempt and applied Regulation 1591's treatment of related supplies. Because the strap secured that exempt item to the patient, its sale was exempt as well.
Common questions
Was every catheter strap or accessory exempt?
The opinion addressed this strap's use with an already-exempt indwelling Foley catheter. It did not announce a blanket result for accessories serving taxable products.
Did the same letter decide other urinary-system equipment?
Yes, but on different facts. A drainage-system meter's result depended on whether it was worn on the patient's belt or hung from a pole.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369 — prescription-medicine exemption referenced in the opinion
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(b)(5) and (j) — authority cited for exempt related supplies
- California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591(c)(2) — general exclusion for devices used to diagnose or apply treatment
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/425-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/425-0229-700.pdf
Original ruling text
425.0229.700
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
MEMBER
First District
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 324-3828
BRAD SHERMAN
Second District, Los Angeles
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
December 20, 1993
MATTHEW K. FONG
Fourth District, Los Angeles
GRAY DAVIS
Controller, Sacramento
Ms. K--- K--G--- M--- C--XXXX --- Road
P.O. Box XXXXX
---, --- XXXXX-XXXX
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
Re:
SZ -- XX-XXXXXX
Sales Tax on Medical Supplies
Dear Ms. K---:
I am responding to your letter to me dated October 28, 1993. You asked if sales or use tax applies to the sales by your company (“G---”) of three medical items. You described their use in your letter and attached copies of descriptive brochure pages. OPINION In our previous correspondence, I have discussed the legal principles governing the prescription medicines exemption from sales and use tax provided by Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6369, interpreted and implemented by Regulation 1591, and so for the sake of brevity will not repeat them here. (Unless otherwise stated, all further statutory citations are to the Revenue and Taxation Code.) Please remember that, as a rule, items used to diagnose a condition or to apply medicine or treatment to the patient are not considered to be medicines. (Reg. 1591(c)(2).) Based on the above standard, we conclude as to the items at issue as follows: A. Catheter Leg Strap. You describe the use of this product as follows: “The strap merely secures the catheter to the patient’s thigh.” The copy of the brochure page on this item states that it secures “an indwelling Foley to patient’s upper thigh without tourniquet action, eliminating the need for tape.” Under Regulation 1591(b)(5) and (j), the sale of “related supplies” for the exempt item is exempt as well as the sale of the item itself. We have previously determined that sales of Foley catheters are exempt from tax under the above authority. So, then, are sales of straps used to secure such catheters to patients.
Ms. K--- K---
-2-
December 20, 1993
425.0229.700
B.
Urine Drainage System Meter. You request advice on the tax status of sales of a drainage system meter such as the one described in the enclosed brochure excerpt. Exhibit #2 to your letter shows the B--- Center-entry Urinary Drainage Bag with Reflux Device. It includes the following items: “anti-reflux valve, 2000ml round profile drainage bag, vented drip chamber, bag vent, large diameter tubing. Includes urine sample port on catheter connector, sheeting clip, handle with ‘living hinges’ for secure hanging, and latex outlet tube.” As you remember, the “related supplies” must be fully worn on the patients for their sales to be exempt under the above authority. You do not, unfortunately, indicate if this system meter hangs from the patient’s belt or from a pole. If the former, its sale is exempt, but if the latter, its sale is subject to tax. C. Infusion Set. Your Exhibit #3 shows the --- - --- D--- Infusion Set which contains an inserter, adapter, needle, and flow-control plug. You do not indicate the type of infusion system to which these items are attached. Regular IV drug infusion systems are subject to tax. Programmable drug infusion systems worn or implanted in the human body have their own special exemption. (Reg. 1591(b)(7).) As with the Urine Drainage System Meter, the tax status of sales of this infusion set is controlled by that of the infusion system. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,
John L. Waid
Tax Counsel
JLW:es
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1993. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace