Could a blood-plasma unit remain wholly exempt when it included a small taxable administration set?

Short answer The 1962 letter said yes when the set was under 2% of price, but an attached 1998 note superseded that treatment and required allocation between exempt and taxable items.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0220
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1962-09-13
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A medical-products seller asking about solutions, plasma units, administration equipment, and hospital sales

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1962. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1962
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The same September 13, 1962 supporting letter separately grounds Annotation 425.0480 on intravenous and irrigation solutions. Its original under-2-percent plasma-unit rule is followed by a June 15, 1998 note stating that kits with exempt medicine and taxable items must be prorated. The later instruction controls this page's summary.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The 1962 letter originally treated a blood-plasma unit as fully exempt even when it included an administration set worth less than 2 percent of the total price. It separately said administration equipment generally was not part of the prescription-medicine exemption.

An attached June 15, 1998 note changed the mixed-kit treatment: when a kit includes exempt medicine and taxable other items, the price must be prorated. This page therefore does not present the earlier under-2-percent approach as current annotation guidance.

Common questions

Was blood plasma itself treated as exempt?

Yes.

Was administration equipment generally exempt?

No.

Could the whole kit remain exempt because the taxable set was less than 2 percent?

Not under the attached 1998 instruction; allocation was required.

Citations and references

  • Historical California Board of Equalization Ruling 22(a) — qualifying prescription-medicine channels applied in the letter
  • Historical California Board of Equalization Ruling 22(f) — hospital-resale treatment discussed in the letter

Source

Original ruling text

425.0220

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

September 13, 1962

H--- L--P. O. Box XXX
--- ---, California
Attention:

J-XXXXX

Mr. A. R. H---

Gentlemen:
In answer to your letter of August 28, we advise that Intravenous and Irrigation Solutions constitute, in our opinion, medicine as defined in Sales and Use Tax Ruling 22. Accordingly, when furnished as described under part (a) of that ruling, their sale is subject to the exemption applicable to prescription medicines. We have held that a sale of a unit of Blood Plasma is exempt even though the unit includes an administration set constituting under 2% of the total price of the unit*. In general, administration equipment will not be regarded as included within the prescription medicine exemption. If you wish a ruling on any specific equipment, we suggest you supply us with full information. The prescription medicine exemption applies in a proper case to sales to patients by druggists, hospitals, and doctors. The real basis for your claiming exemption with respect to sales to hospitals is that your sales are sales for resale. You will note from Ruling 22, part (f), that hospitals are retailers of prescription medicines furnished as indicated in part (a) whether or not a charge is made for such medicines. You should, accordingly, support your deductions of sales to hospitals by taking resale certificates from the hospitals. Very truly yours,

E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel

EHS:fb
cc:

--- --- – District Administrator

*Must prorate when kit includes
exempt sale of medicine and
taxable sale of other items.
DHL 6/15/98

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1962. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace