Could an ocean liner's staffed onboard medical facility qualify as a hospital for the medicine exemption?

Short answer Yes. California treated facilities with a voyage physician, hospital beds and equipment, and two registered nurses as hospitals despite having no onboard pharmacist.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 425.0100
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1964-05-11
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Audit staff asking about medicines used aboard foreign-commerce ocean liners
Topics

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1964. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1964
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This 1964 memorandum applied a historical hospital definition to specific foreign-commerce vessels carrying physicians, nurses, beds, and equipment. Current maritime requirements, facility facts, and tax law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated the described ocean liners' onboard medical facilities as hospitals. Federal law required a licensed physician and surgeon on each voyage, and each vessel maintained hospital beds, equipment, and two registered nurses for passengers and crew.

Although no registered pharmacist was aboard, the carriers could claim an exemption for medicines used or dispensed without charge through those shipboard hospital facilities.

Common questions

Did the absence of an onboard pharmacist defeat hospital status?

No under the described facts.

What staffing and facilities were present?

A licensed physician and surgeon, two registered nurses, hospital beds, and equipment.

Were the medicines separately charged to passengers?

No. The memorandum said they were furnished without charge.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6369 — historical hospital medicine exemption applied in the memorandum

Source

Original ruling text

State of California

Board of Equalization

425.0100

Memorandum
To:

REDACTED TEXT – Aud.(LC/REP)

From:

Tax Counsel (PM)

Subject:

“M”, “C”

Date:

May 11, 1964

In memorandum dated April 2 you ask whether tax applies to the sale or use of medicines under the following circumstances: "M" and "O" operate the "L", "M", and "X" in foreign commerce. The vessels carry approximately 360 to 700 passengers and a crew of approximately 270. Under federal law, the vessels must have a licensed physician and surgeon on each voyage. In addition, a hospital with beds, equipment and two registered nurses is maintained for the passengers and crew, where medicines are furnished without charge. There are no registered pharmacists on board. It is our opinion that the described facilities qualify as "hospitals" under Section 6369, as amended September 20, 1963. Accordingly, the carriers are entitled to claim a tax exemption for any medicines which they use or dispense at their hospital facilities aboard ship. PM:md [lb]

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1964. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace