Was a dispensing optician the consumer or retailer of eyeglasses supplied directly to wearers versus to physicians or optometrists?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1977. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California treated a registered dispensing optician as the consumer of ophthalmic materials when the optician dispensed eyeglasses directly to the people who would wear them.
The result changed when the optician transferred eyeglasses to an optometrist or physician, who then transferred them to patients. In that setting the optician was not acting as the person dispensing the ophthalmic materials under section 6018 and was the retailer, not the consumer, of the eyeglasses and other materials supplied.
Common questions
Was the optician the consumer when supplying the wearer directly?
Yes.
What if the glasses went first to a physician or optometrist?
The optician was the retailer.
What controlled the distinction?
Whether the optician directly dispensed the glasses to the person who would wear them.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6018
- California Business and Professions Code § 2550
- California Code of Regulations, title 18, Regulation 1592(b)(1)
- Adviser's December 24, 1976 letter to A. M. Brown — client transactions and question described; full letter not reproduced in the official PDF
- Dispensing optician client's registration, prescriptions, direct transfers to wearers, and transfers through physicians and optometrists to their patients — facts described; underlying license, prescription, eyeglass, customer, professional, delivery, billing, and transaction records not reproduced in the official PDF
- Conversation with an unidentified person in the Board of Medical Examiners — consultation identified; person's name, date, and conversation record not supplied in the official PDF
- Possible later billing, returns, tax treatment, audit, assessment, appeal, or other outcome after the advice — no follow-up records or final outcomes supplied in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/225-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/225-0050.pdf
Original ruling text
225.0050
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 455-6439
January 12, 1977
Mr. [K]
[A]
XXXXX --- ---, #XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. [K]:
In your letter of December 24, 1976 to Mr. Brown, you asked our opinion as to the tax consequences regarding certain transactions entered into by a client of yours who is a dispensing optician. In addition to dispensing eyeglasses pursuant to a prescription to the public, he also transfers eyeglasses to physicians and optometrists, who in turn transfer them to their patients. You asked whether or not both of these types of transactions fall under paragraph (b)(1) of Regulation 1592, and therefore make your client the consumer of such eyeglasses. Section 6018 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides: “A licensed optometrist, physician and surgeon or registered dispensing optician is a consumer of, and shall not be considered a retailer within the provisions of this part in the case of a licensed optometrist or physician and surgeon with respect to the ophthalmic materials used or furnished by him, in the performance of his professional services in the diagnosis, treatment or correction of conditions of the human eye, including the adaptation of lenses or frames for the aid thereof, or in the case of a registered dispensing optician with respect to the dispensing of ophthalmic materials.” (Emphasis added.) You will note it is only in the case when your client is acting as a dispensing optician, is he regarded as the consumer. Accordingly, our determination of whether or not your client is the consumer of the ophthalmic material he supplies depends on whether or not he is acting in the capacity of a dispensing optician when he transfers the materials. In talking with a person in the Board of Medical Examiners, and reviewing Section 2550 of the Business and Professions Code, it is our opinion that your client is only acting in the capacity of a dispensing optician dispensing ophthalmic material when he dispenses eyeglasses directly to the persons who are to wear them. As such he is considered the consumer of the ophthalmic material.
Mr. [K]
-2-
January 12, 1977
225.0050
In those cases in which he merely transfers eyeglasses to the optometrist or physician who in turn transfer them to their patients, he is not considered as “dispensing ophthalmic materials” within Section 6018. Under those circumstances, he is regarded as the retailer rather than the consumer of the eyeglasses and other ophthalmic material he supplies. Very truly yours,
Glenn L. Rigby
Tax Counsel
GLR:po
cc:
A. M. Brown
Principal Auditor
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1977. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace