Was a dispensing optician the consumer or retailer of eyeglasses supplied directly to wearers versus to physicians or optometrists?

Short answer The optician was the consumer when dispensing directly to wearers, but the retailer when transferring eyeglasses to physicians or optometrists for their patients.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 225.0050
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1977-01-12
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
An adviser to a dispensing optician supplying eyeglasses to patients and health professionals

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1977. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1977
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This January 12, 1977 opinion describes but does not reproduce the adviser's December 24 letter or the client's license, prescriptions, eyeglasses, customers, health professionals, deliveries, billing, and transactions. It also relies on a conversation with an unidentified Board of Medical Examiners person but supplies no name, date, or conversation record. The PDF supplies no later billing, return, tax treatment, audit, assessment, appeal, or outcome. Current law and complete facts control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

California treated a registered dispensing optician as the consumer of ophthalmic materials when the optician dispensed eyeglasses directly to the people who would wear them.

The result changed when the optician transferred eyeglasses to an optometrist or physician, who then transferred them to patients. In that setting the optician was not acting as the person dispensing the ophthalmic materials under section 6018 and was the retailer, not the consumer, of the eyeglasses and other materials supplied.

Common questions

Was the optician the consumer when supplying the wearer directly?

Yes.

What if the glasses went first to a physician or optometrist?

The optician was the retailer.

What controlled the distinction?

Whether the optician directly dispensed the glasses to the person who would wear them.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6018
  • California Business and Professions Code § 2550
  • California Code of Regulations, title 18, Regulation 1592(b)(1)
  • Adviser's December 24, 1976 letter to A. M. Brown — client transactions and question described; full letter not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Dispensing optician client's registration, prescriptions, direct transfers to wearers, and transfers through physicians and optometrists to their patients — facts described; underlying license, prescription, eyeglass, customer, professional, delivery, billing, and transaction records not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Conversation with an unidentified person in the Board of Medical Examiners — consultation identified; person's name, date, and conversation record not supplied in the official PDF
  • Possible later billing, returns, tax treatment, audit, assessment, appeal, or other outcome after the advice — no follow-up records or final outcomes supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

225.0050

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
1020 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0001)
(916) 455-6439

January 12, 1977

Mr. [K]
[A]
XXXXX --- ---, #XXX
--- ---, CA XXXXX
Dear Mr. [K]:
In your letter of December 24, 1976 to Mr. Brown, you asked our opinion as to the tax consequences regarding certain transactions entered into by a client of yours who is a dispensing optician. In addition to dispensing eyeglasses pursuant to a prescription to the public, he also transfers eyeglasses to physicians and optometrists, who in turn transfer them to their patients. You asked whether or not both of these types of transactions fall under paragraph (b)(1) of Regulation 1592, and therefore make your client the consumer of such eyeglasses. Section 6018 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides: “A licensed optometrist, physician and surgeon or registered dispensing optician is a consumer of, and shall not be considered a retailer within the provisions of this part in the case of a licensed optometrist or physician and surgeon with respect to the ophthalmic materials used or furnished by him, in the performance of his professional services in the diagnosis, treatment or correction of conditions of the human eye, including the adaptation of lenses or frames for the aid thereof, or in the case of a registered dispensing optician with respect to the dispensing of ophthalmic materials.” (Emphasis added.) You will note it is only in the case when your client is acting as a dispensing optician, is he regarded as the consumer. Accordingly, our determination of whether or not your client is the consumer of the ophthalmic material he supplies depends on whether or not he is acting in the capacity of a dispensing optician when he transfers the materials. In talking with a person in the Board of Medical Examiners, and reviewing Section 2550 of the Business and Professions Code, it is our opinion that your client is only acting in the capacity of a dispensing optician dispensing ophthalmic material when he dispenses eyeglasses directly to the persons who are to wear them. As such he is considered the consumer of the ophthalmic material.

Mr. [K]

-2-

January 12, 1977
225.0050

In those cases in which he merely transfers eyeglasses to the optometrist or physician who in turn transfer them to their patients, he is not considered as “dispensing ophthalmic materials” within Section 6018. Under those circumstances, he is regarded as the retailer rather than the consumer of the eyeglasses and other ophthalmic material he supplies. Very truly yours,

Glenn L. Rigby
Tax Counsel

GLR:po
cc:

A. M. Brown
Principal Auditor

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1977. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace