Was a corporation's transfer of furniture and fixtures to a shareholder in exchange for retiring the shareholder's stock taxable?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation proposed distributing furniture and fixtures to one stockholder. In return, the stockholder would surrender shares the corporation would retire under its plan to reduce stated capital.
E. H. Stetson concluded that the exchange was taxable and that the amount subject to tax was the value of the shares exchanged for the tangible personal property. The source gives no stock value, furniture value, tax type, rate, tax amount, completed transfer, accounting entry, assessment, or later outcome.
Internal posture, source/live difference, and missing record
The office correspondence is addressed to William R. Thomson, identified with the parenthetical PER, and concerns an account and inquiry by a redacted law firm. It refers to Thomson's June 29 memorandum but supplies neither that memorandum nor the law firm's inquiry. It does not state the year of June 29, the lawyers' question, the corporation's identity, or the parties' full facts.
The entire substantive source is one paragraph. It identifies furniture and fixtures as the distributed property, one corporate stockholder as recipient, that holder's corporate shares as the exchange consideration, corporate retirement of the shares, and a plan to reduce stated capital. It supplies no articles, bylaws, board or shareholder resolution, plan, capital account, stated-capital amount, share count, class, basis, voting rights, ownership percentage, creditor, solvency, dividend, redemption, dissolution, property list, title, possession, invoice, appraisal, or book entry.
Stetson calls the transaction taxable and measures the amount by stock value. No statute, regulation, case, annotation, or legal reasoning appears in the supporting PDF. The source does not specify sales tax rather than use tax, identify who owes or collects it, establish retailer or permit status, state whether an exemption was claimed, or provide an applicable rate or local component.
The live annotation preserves the furniture, stockholder, stock exchange, capital-reduction plan, taxable result, and August 14, 1951 date. It adds that the plan was merely to reduce stated capital and was (not in final liquidation of corporation). The supporting PDF does not state either characterization, and no dissolution record or other source is supplied to prove the live no-final-liquidation fact.
The live entry also omits the redacted law-firm inquiry, June 29 memorandum, William Thomson, E. H. Stetson, stock-value measure, absence of cited law, missing transaction records, and lack of any completed exchange or tax outcome.
What this means for you
Corporations returning property to owners
Exchanging business property for a stockholder's surrendered shares was treated as taxable even though the corporation planned to retire the shares and reduce stated capital. Preserve the legal plan and prove whether the transfer is a redemption, distribution, liquidation, or another transaction under current law.
Accountants and tax professionals
Identify what the corporation receives for transferred property. Document the shares, property, values, accounting, timing, ownership, retailer status, tax type and rate, exemptions, and completed outcome; this source supplies only stock value as the measure, not an amount.
Common questions
Q: What property did the corporation transfer?
A: Furniture and fixtures.
Q: What did the shareholder give up?
A: The shareholder's stock in the corporation.
Q: What would the corporation do with the stock?
A: Retire it under the plan to reduce stated capital.
Q: How did staff measure the taxable amount?
A: By the value of the stock exchanged for the property.
Q: Did the source say this was not a final liquidation?
A: No. The live annotation adds that statement; the PDF only says the stock would be retired under a plan to reduce stated capital.
Q: What statute made the exchange taxable?
A: The one-paragraph source cites no statute, regulation, case, or annotation.
Q: What were the shares and furniture worth?
A: No amount or valuation evidence is supplied, even though stock value was the stated measure.
Q: Did the transfer occur or produce a tax assessment?
A: The source provides no completed exchange, retirement, return, audit, assessment, payment, claim, appeal, or outcome.
Citations and references
- No statute, regulation, case, or annotation is cited in the supporting correspondence.
- June 29 memorandum and redacted law-firm inquiry — described but not included
- Corporate, shareholder, capital-reduction, share, furniture-and-fixture, value, exchange, retirement, accounting, liquidation, retailer, tax, return, audit, assessment, payment, claim, appeal, and outcome records — described or implicated but not included
Merelyreducing stated capital andnot in final liquidation of corporation— live-annotation additions not stated in the supporting PDF
Verbatim support
From the official August 14, 1951 E. H. Stetson correspondence:
With reference to your memorandum of June 29 regarding the above subject, it is our opinion that the distribution of furniture and fixtures of the corporation to one of its stockholders in return for the stock held in the corporation by that stockholder which is to be retired by the corporation pursuant to its plan to reduce its stated capital, constitutes a taxable transaction.
The amount subject to tax is the value of the stock exchanged for the tangible personal property.
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: CDTFA Annotated Legal Opinions
- Live annotation: Annotation 395.2220
- Original supporting opinion: 395.2220 PDF
Original ruling text
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
395.2220
Sacramento, California
August 14, 1951
To:
Mr. Wm. R. Thomson (PER)
From:
E. H. Stetson
Re:
Inquiry of ---, --- & ---,
Attorneys at Law re
M---s’ of H---
Account
X- XXXXX
With reference to your memorandum of June 29 regarding the above subject, it is our opinion that the distribution of furniture and fixtures of the corporation to one of its stockholders in return for the stock held in the corporation by that stockholder which is to be retired by the corporation pursuant to its plan to reduce its stated capital, constitutes a taxable transaction. The amount subject to tax is the value of the stock exchanged for the tangible personal property.
EHS:ja
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace