Was a corporation's transfer of furniture and fixtures to a shareholder in exchange for retiring the shareholder's stock taxable?

Short answer Yes. The August 14 correspondence treated a corporation's furniture-and-fixtures transfer to one stockholder for that holder's retired stock as taxable, measured by the stock's value. The live annotation adds that the plan merely reduced stated capital and was not a final liquidation; the supporting PDF says the stock retirement was under a stated-capital-reduction plan but does not supply the no-final-liquidation fact. No statute, value, tax amount, completed transfer, or outcome is provided.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 395.2220
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1951-08-14
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Internal Board recipient William R. Thomson (PER)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1951. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1951
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This August 14, 1951 California State Board of Equalization internal correspondence answers an unpublished June 29 memorandum about an unpublished redacted law-firm inquiry. It says only that one corporation proposed transferring furniture and fixtures to one stockholder for shares the corporation would retire under a stated-capital-reduction plan. CDTFA's current annotation adds `merely` and `not in final liquidation of corporation`, facts not stated in the supporting PDF. This historical internal opinion binds no other capital transaction. Check current corporate, redemption, distribution, consideration, valuation, liquidation, sales-and-use-tax, and documentation law. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation proposed distributing furniture and fixtures to one stockholder. In return, the stockholder would surrender shares the corporation would retire under its plan to reduce stated capital.

E. H. Stetson concluded that the exchange was taxable and that the amount subject to tax was the value of the shares exchanged for the tangible personal property. The source gives no stock value, furniture value, tax type, rate, tax amount, completed transfer, accounting entry, assessment, or later outcome.

Internal posture, source/live difference, and missing record

The office correspondence is addressed to William R. Thomson, identified with the parenthetical PER, and concerns an account and inquiry by a redacted law firm. It refers to Thomson's June 29 memorandum but supplies neither that memorandum nor the law firm's inquiry. It does not state the year of June 29, the lawyers' question, the corporation's identity, or the parties' full facts.

The entire substantive source is one paragraph. It identifies furniture and fixtures as the distributed property, one corporate stockholder as recipient, that holder's corporate shares as the exchange consideration, corporate retirement of the shares, and a plan to reduce stated capital. It supplies no articles, bylaws, board or shareholder resolution, plan, capital account, stated-capital amount, share count, class, basis, voting rights, ownership percentage, creditor, solvency, dividend, redemption, dissolution, property list, title, possession, invoice, appraisal, or book entry.

Stetson calls the transaction taxable and measures the amount by stock value. No statute, regulation, case, annotation, or legal reasoning appears in the supporting PDF. The source does not specify sales tax rather than use tax, identify who owes or collects it, establish retailer or permit status, state whether an exemption was claimed, or provide an applicable rate or local component.

The live annotation preserves the furniture, stockholder, stock exchange, capital-reduction plan, taxable result, and August 14, 1951 date. It adds that the plan was merely to reduce stated capital and was (not in final liquidation of corporation). The supporting PDF does not state either characterization, and no dissolution record or other source is supplied to prove the live no-final-liquidation fact.

The live entry also omits the redacted law-firm inquiry, June 29 memorandum, William Thomson, E. H. Stetson, stock-value measure, absence of cited law, missing transaction records, and lack of any completed exchange or tax outcome.

What this means for you

Corporations returning property to owners

Exchanging business property for a stockholder's surrendered shares was treated as taxable even though the corporation planned to retire the shares and reduce stated capital. Preserve the legal plan and prove whether the transfer is a redemption, distribution, liquidation, or another transaction under current law.

Accountants and tax professionals

Identify what the corporation receives for transferred property. Document the shares, property, values, accounting, timing, ownership, retailer status, tax type and rate, exemptions, and completed outcome; this source supplies only stock value as the measure, not an amount.

Common questions

Q: What property did the corporation transfer?

A: Furniture and fixtures.

Q: What did the shareholder give up?

A: The shareholder's stock in the corporation.

Q: What would the corporation do with the stock?

A: Retire it under the plan to reduce stated capital.

Q: How did staff measure the taxable amount?

A: By the value of the stock exchanged for the property.

Q: Did the source say this was not a final liquidation?

A: No. The live annotation adds that statement; the PDF only says the stock would be retired under a plan to reduce stated capital.

Q: What statute made the exchange taxable?

A: The one-paragraph source cites no statute, regulation, case, or annotation.

Q: What were the shares and furniture worth?

A: No amount or valuation evidence is supplied, even though stock value was the stated measure.

Q: Did the transfer occur or produce a tax assessment?

A: The source provides no completed exchange, retirement, return, audit, assessment, payment, claim, appeal, or outcome.

Citations and references

  • No statute, regulation, case, or annotation is cited in the supporting correspondence.
  • June 29 memorandum and redacted law-firm inquiry — described but not included
  • Corporate, shareholder, capital-reduction, share, furniture-and-fixture, value, exchange, retirement, accounting, liquidation, retailer, tax, return, audit, assessment, payment, claim, appeal, and outcome records — described or implicated but not included
  • Merely reducing stated capital and not in final liquidation of corporation — live-annotation additions not stated in the supporting PDF

Verbatim support

From the official August 14, 1951 E. H. Stetson correspondence:

With reference to your memorandum of June 29 regarding the above subject, it is our opinion that the distribution of furniture and fixtures of the corporation to one of its stockholders in return for the stock held in the corporation by that stockholder which is to be retired by the corporation pursuant to its plan to reduce its stated capital, constitutes a taxable transaction.

The amount subject to tax is the value of the stock exchanged for the tangible personal property.

Source

Original ruling text

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

395.2220
Sacramento, California
August 14, 1951

To:

Mr. Wm. R. Thomson (PER)

From:

E. H. Stetson

Re:

Inquiry of ---, --- & ---,
Attorneys at Law re
M---s’ of H---

Account

X- XXXXX

With reference to your memorandum of June 29 regarding the above subject, it is our opinion that the distribution of furniture and fixtures of the corporation to one of its stockholders in return for the stock held in the corporation by that stockholder which is to be retired by the corporation pursuant to its plan to reduce its stated capital, constitutes a taxable transaction. The amount subject to tax is the value of the stock exchanged for the tangible personal property.

EHS:ja

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1951. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace