Were posters, vinyl carry bags, and records inserted into and distributed with an exempt periodical all exempt component parts?

Short answer No. Printed paper posters were exempt components, but vinyl bags and records were taxable premiums even if attached; tax was measured by their cost absent evidence of a higher receipt.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 385.0769
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1985-11-21
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A periodical publisher asking about posters, vinyl bags, and records (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1985
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This November 21, 1985 California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel letter answers an unpublished September 20 request from a redacted exempt-periodical publisher. Documents it refers to, such as the request or supporting records, are not published with it. It classifies paper posters, vinyl bags, and records under historical component and premium rules. Another publisher should check current component, insert, premium, bundle, sales-tax, and use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A redacted exempt periodical occasionally distributed advertising as poster, record, and bag inserts. The publisher relied on Regulation 1590's examples of handbills, circulars, flyers, order forms, reply envelopes, and maps attached to or inserted and distributed with periodicals. A Board office sent Legal two periodical copies and a vinyl carry bag bearing a redacted logo; none appears in the official PDF.

California treated paper posters inserted and distributed with the periodical like the regulation's other printed paper matter. They were exempt component parts. Regulation 1590(a)(3) required physical incorporation and excluded items merely consumed or used in publication production.

Vinyl bags and records were not printed paper matter and did not become periodical components even if physically attached. Annotation 385.0590 supplied the comparison for complete musical tapes sold with a periodical. The bags and records were premiums delivered with an exempt item.

Under Regulation 1670(d), a premium certain to be received rather than dependent on chance or skill formed a sale of both articles. When delivered with an exempt periodical, tax applied to premium receipts. California measured the vinyl-bag and record sales by the publisher's cost unless evidence showed a larger amount received.

Source and live-annotation limits

The official PDF does not include the September 20, 1985 request, two submitted periodical copies, logo bag, poster or record inserts, other publication issues, attachment or distribution evidence, advertising agreements, subscriber records, premium terms, chance-or-skill facts, costs, prices, invoices, sales, receipts, returns, tax calculations or payments, audit, assessment, claim, appeal, enclosed Regulations 1590 and 1670, or later outcome. The publisher, publication, Board office, logo owner, subscribers, products, transactions, and amounts are redacted or unidentified.

The source prints “becomes and ingredient.” The original-text section preserves that form rather than silently correcting the official record.

The live annotation preserves only that vinyl bags and records were nonpaper premiums rather than components governed by Regulation 1670. It omits the September request and referral, redacted publication and no-account notation, rarity, submitted publication copies and logo bag, publisher argument, poster inserts and their exemption, former section 6362, full Regulation 1590 component analysis, Annotation 385.0590, certainty/chance/skill premium conditions, gross-receipts and cost measure, missing Regulations 1590/1670 enclosures, missing records, redactions, and outcome limits.

What this means for you

Periodical publishers and tax professionals

Separate printed paper inserts from nonpaper merchandise, document physical incorporation and distribution, classify premiums, and do not rely solely on attachment. Preserve every item and issue, agreements, subscriber records, costs, prices, invoices, receipts, returns, and tax calculations.

Common questions

Q: Were inserted posters exempt components?

A: Yes.

Q: Were vinyl bags and records components?

A: No.

Q: Did physical attachment make nonpaper items exempt?

A: No.

Q: What was the tax measure for the premiums?

A: Their cost absent evidence of a higher amount received.

Citations and references

  • Former California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6362
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulations 1590(a)(3) and 1670(d)
  • California Sales and Use Tax Annotation 385.0590 (July 22, 1976)
  • September 20, 1985 request, two periodical copies, logo bag, posters, records, prices, transactions, and tax records — described or implicated but not documented
  • Enclosed Regulations 1590 and 1670 — copies not included

Verbatim support

From the official Tax Counsel letter:

We consider that the posters which you from time to time insert in the periodical would likewise qualify under Regulation 1590(a)(3) as an ingredient or component part of the periodical.

However, we cannot agree with your contention that tangible personal property such as vinyl bags and records, or any similar items which are not printed matter, constitute ingredient or component parts of the periodical, even if these items are in some manner physically attached to the periodical.

In this latter case, tax applies to the gross receipts from the sale of the premium, which will be regarded as the cost of the premium to the retailer in the absence of any evidence that the retailer is receiving a larger sum.

Source

Original ruling text

385.0769

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
(916) 445-6493

November 21, 1985

Ms. S--- M--B--- R--- E--P. O. Box XXXX
---, CA XXXXX-XXXX
Re:

B--- R--- E--- – [no account number]
Inserts in periodicals – vinyl bags,
Posters, and records

Dear Ms. M---:
In your September 20, 1985 letter to the Board’s --- --- Office, which was referred to the legal staff for response, you write: There has been some confusion regarding the definition of advertising components inserted into my periodical or newspaper according to your Regulation 1590. I would appreciate your ruling on the matter. The newspaper/periodical carries advertising which from time to time takes the form of poster inserts, record inserts, bag inserts (see attached) which are included as part of the magazine and distributed with it as a component part. The occasions are rare for these inserts, but according to item (3) of Regulation 1590 “Handbills, circulars, flyers, order forms, reply envelopes, maps or the like are considered as component parts of a newspaper or periodical when attached to or inserted in and distributed with the newspaper or periodical.” The advertising in question fits this ruling according to my understanding. Please advise in writing as to your ruling. We received from the --- --- Office of the Board, two copies of the periodical “B--- R--- E---”, together with a vinyl carry bag imprinted with the logo of Q--- R---.

B--- R--- E---

-2-

Nov. 21, 1985
385.0769

Opinion
Our opinion is that the vinyl bags and records which you deliver to the periodical’s subscribers are taxable as premiums, and are not exempt as ingredient or component parts of the periodical. However, it is also our opinion that posters inserted in and delivered with the periodical are exempt as ingredient or component parts of the periodical. Our reasons for these conclusions are as follows: Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6362 exempts from sales and use tax newspapers and periodicals published with the requisite frequency, together with tangible personal property which becomes and ingredient or component part of the newspaper or periodical. There is no question here that “B--- R--- E---” qualifies as an exempt periodical under Section 6362. In Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1590(a)(3), the Board has interpreted the term “ingredient or component part of a newspaper or periodical” to include only those items that become physically incorporated into the publication, and not those which are merely consumed or used in the production of the publication. As you point out, the regulation provides that for example, handbills, circulars, flyers, order forms, reply envelopes, maps or the like are considered as component parts of a periodical when they are attached to or inserted and distributed with the periodical. All of these examples constitute ingredient or component parts of a printed periodical because they are also printed matter, and are printed on paper products. We consider that the posters which you from time to time insert in the periodical would likewise qualify under Regulation 1590(a)(3) as an ingredient or component part of the periodical. However, we cannot agree with your contention that tangible personal property such as vinyl bags and records, or any similar items which are not printed matter, constitute ingredient or component parts of the periodical, even if these items are in some manner physically attached to the periodical. For example, the Board’s legal staff has previously issued an opinion, Business Taxes Law Guide Annotation 385.0590 which states: Tapes and cassette recordings of musical selections which are complete in themselves are not exempt as periodicals even though sold on a subscription basis and distributed with a periodical issued at regular intervals. 7/22/76. Rather, we consider that these vinyl bags and records constitute taxable tangible personal property delivered as premiums together with the periodical. Regulation 1670(d) provides that when a person delivers tangible personal property as a premium together with other merchandise sold, and the obtaining of the premium by the purchaser is certain and not dependent upon chance or skill, the transaction is a sale of both articles. Tax applies to the gross receipts received from the purchaser for both the goods and the premium, except when the premium is delivered along with an exempt item, such as an exempt periodical. In this latter case, tax applies to the gross receipts from the sale of the premium, which will be regarded as the cost of the premium to the retailer in the absence of any evidence that the retailer is receiving a larger sum.

B--- R--- E---

-3-

Nov. 21, 1985
385.0769

Our view is that Regulation 1670(d) applies to this situation, and tax applies to your sales of the vinyl bags and records, but not the posters, measured by your costs for the vinyl bags and records. I enclose a copy of Regulation 1590 and 1670 for your information. Please feel free to contact me if you have any further questions or comments about this letter. Very truly yours,

John Abbott
Tax Counsel

JA:ss
Encl.

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1985. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace