Did monthly MLS books qualify for California's subscription-periodical exemption when common carriers delivered them only to a central member pickup point?

Short answer No. Carrier delivery had to reach each subscriber; central pickup left the subscriptions taxable whether or not the books otherwise qualified as periodicals.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 385.0351
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1996-06-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A redacted Board of Realtors selling monthly MLS books to member Realtors by subscription

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1996
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 10, 1996 California State Board of Equalization Tax Counsel letter answers an unpublished March 1 request from a redacted Board of Realtors. Documents it refers to, such as the request or supporting records, are not published with it. It assumes each subscriber collected monthly MLS books from a central point, does not decide their periodical status without a sample, and says legal-staff opinions may be relied upon by taxpayers only on specific questions. Another publisher should check current periodical, advertising-content, subscriber-delivery, carrier, resale, sales-tax, and use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A redacted Board of Realtors sold monthly multiple-listing-service books to its member Realtors by subscription. Its absent request said a common carrier handled each of two delivery legs: from the Reno airport to Board offices and from those offices to a central member pickup point. It also asserted that every month's issue was 90 percent advertising and 10 percent nonadvertising matter.

Counsel assumed the pickup point was not a subscribing Realtor's office. Section 6051 taxed retail sales of tangible personal property measured by gross receipts unless an exemption applied. Under section 6362.7 and Regulation 1590(b)(3), the subscription-periodical exemption covered a qualifying periodical appearing four to 60 times yearly and delivered by mail or common carrier.

California construed that delivery condition to require delivery by the retailer to each subscriber. Because subscribers instead picked up the books at a central location, the sales were taxable whether or not the books otherwise met the periodical requirements. Using a carrier for both earlier legs did not change the result.

Counsel did not decide the content question without reviewing a copy. The letter contrasted ordinary home-listing, correction, and sold-property lists under Annotation 385.0340 with the detailed sold-property market information treated as news under Annotation 385.0341, including location, bedroom count, prices, sale terms, financing, brokers, agents, sale date, and days on market.

The Board could issue its vendor a resale certificate to buy the publications “extax,” as printed, then had to report and pay sales tax on total publication receipts. Counsel offered to review the books if delivery changed to reach subscribers directly.

Source and live-annotation limits

The official PDF does not include the March 1, 1996 request, MLS books or other samples, printed-area calculations, subscriptions, member list, carrier contracts, airport receipt, Board-office transfer, central pickup records, invoices, gross receipts, vendor purchase, resale certificate, returns, tax calculations or payments, later direct-delivery arrangement, renewed review, assessment, claim, appeal, or other outcome. The Board, member pickup location, carriers, airport-side contacts, district, and recipients are redacted.

The request as quoted in the letter calls the statute “Section 6363.7.” Counsel's analysis later identifies section 6362.7 and subdivision (c). This page preserves that discrepancy rather than silently treating the request quotation as a second citation. The source also prints “extax” and “report and pay sale of the sales tax”; the original-text section keeps those forms verbatim.

The live annotation accurately preserves the central-pickup facts and taxable result. It omits the March request, Reno airport and Board-office legs, named carrier premise, monthly frequency, stated advertising split, subscriber-office assumption, gross-receipts rule, detailed exemption elements, source's reliance statement, content-test discussion, prior annotations and data fields, missing sample, resale-certificate instruction, direct-delivery review offer, redactions, missing records, and outcome limits.

What this means for you

MLS publishers and tax professionals

Document issue frequency, content, printed-area calculations, subscription terms, carrier custody, and the final delivery point for each subscriber. A carrier handling only the route to a shared pickup point did not satisfy the letter's direct-subscriber construction.

Common questions

Q: Did two common-carrier delivery legs ending at a central pickup point qualify?

A: No.

Q: Did California decide that the MLS books otherwise met the periodical test?

A: No. It lacked copies to review.

Q: Could the publisher buy the books for resale?

A: Yes. Counsel directed a resale certificate for the vendor purchase and tax on total subscriber receipts.

Q: Would California reconsider the books if delivery changed?

A: Yes. Counsel offered to review a publication delivered directly to subscribers.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6051 and 6362.7
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1590(b)(3)
  • California Business Taxes Law Guide Annotations 385.0340 and 385.0341
  • March 1, 1996 request, MLS books, samples, printed-area calculations, subscriptions, delivery records, resale certificate, sales and tax records, and outcomes — described or implicated but not documented

Verbatim support

From the official Tax Counsel letter:

We construe that to mean that the retailer delivers the periodical to the subscriber.

Thus, your sale of the MLS books is subject to tax since the MLS books are not delivered to the subscriber by mail or common carrier regardless of whether or not they meet the requirements of a periodical.

Without having a copy to review, we cannot ascertain whether we agree with your application of that criteria.

Source

Original ruling text

385.0351

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
LEGAL DIVISION – MIC: 85
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
PO BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082
TELEPHONE (916) 324-2655
FAX (916) 323-3387

JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento

June 10, 1996

E. L. SORENSEN, JR
Executive Director

Dear
This is in response to your letter dated March 1, 1996, in which you requested an exemption from sales tax for your sales of MLS books. Sales tax exemptions are only provided by statute. However, the legal staff issues opinions which may be relied upon by taxpayers in regard to specific questions. In your letter you state: "The major requirements of Revenue and Taxation Code Section 6363.7 which we must satisfy in order for the MLS book to qualify for sales tax exemption are:

  1. Delivery by mail or common carrier.
  2. The advertising portion does not exceed 90% of an entire issue
    in more than one-half of the issues during any twelve (12)
    month period.
    "Item #1: We have a common carrier on both legs of the delivery of the MLS books.
  3. Delivery from the Reno airport to our board offices at --- is
    provided by --- Delivery out of --- Nevada.
  4. Delivery from our board offices to the pick-up point for
    members in the --- area is provided by --- Delivery Service out of --- Nevada. "Item #2: Our MLS meets the requirement 12 months out of the year Advertising 90% and Non-Advertising 10%."

We understand that the Multiple Listing Service books (MLS) are published monthly and that you sell them to your member Realtors by subscription. We assume the "pick up point" you mention is not the subscribing Realtor's office but is instead a central point where all subscribing Realtors must go in order to receive their MLS books. Section 6051 of the Revenue and Taxation Code imposes sales tax on retailers' retail sales of tangible personal property in this state unless the sale is specifically exempt from tax by statute. The measure of tax is the gross receipts from the retail sales in this state of tangible personal property. Since you sell the MLS books to your members by subscription, the question arises as to whether or not such sales are subject to tax. Certain sales of newspapers and periodicals are exempt from tax. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6362.7.) As explained in subparagraph (b) (3) of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1590, tax does not apply to the sale of a periodical, which appears at least four times but not more than 60 times each year, which is sold by subscription, and which is delivered by mail or common carrier. As noted above, in order for the sale of periodicals to qualify for the sales tax exemption, the periodicals must be delivered by mail or common carrier. We construe that to mean that the retailer delivers the periodical to the subscriber. There is no delivery to the subscriber in this case because the subscriber picks up the MLS books at the central location in --. Thus, your sale of the MLS books is subject to tax since the MLS books are not delivered to the subscriber by mail or common carrier regardless of whether or not they meet the requirements of a periodical. As you noted, a publication does not qualify as a periodical if more than 90 percent of the printed area of the entire issue consists of advertising in more than one-half of the issues during any 12-month period. In other words, those issues must consist of at least 10% news or information of general interest. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6362.7(c).) The Board's legal staff has taken the position that publications printed and distributed among a group of real estate firms showing (1) homes listed for sales, (2) corrections and other changes in the listing, and (3) list of properties that are sold, are not "periodicals." (Bus. Taxes L. Guide Annot. 385.0340, 11/20/57.) However, if the multiple listing service publication provides property sold data which goes beyond the mere listing of property sold such as information on particular pieces of property regarding; the geographical district, number of bedrooms, actual sales price, listed price, terms of sale, methods of financing, listing broker, seller broker, sales agents, date of sale, and number of days on the market, that information is considered "news" or information of general interest for the purpose of applying the "10% news test" described above. (Bus. Taxes L. Guide Annot. 385.0341, 12/18/75.) We note that you concluded that the MLS qualifies as a periodical since, in your opinion, it has less than 90% of the printed area devoted to advertising information. Without having a copy to review, we cannot ascertain whether we agree with your application of that criteria. If the Board of Realtors changes its method of delivery so that it delivers the MLS books directly to the subscribers, we will be glad to review the publication to determine whether we agree with your conclusion. However, since we conclude that tax applies to your sales, you

should issue a resale certificate to your vendor to purchase the publications extax and report and pay sale of the sales tax on the total gross receipts from the publications. If you have any further questions in regard to the matters contained herein, please do not hesitate to write again.

Yours very truly,

Anthony I. Picciano
Tax Counsel

AIP:cl
Enclosure (Reg. 1590)
cc: District Administrator

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace