Could current purchasers use California's special used-mobilehome tax measure when the prior owner had not registered the unit with DHCD but the purchasers later did?

Short answer Yes. 'Previously' modified 'sold,' not 'registered or titled,' so current DHCD registration allowed the used-mobilehome current-value measure and reduced the deficiency.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 362.0080
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1994-06-02
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Mobilehome purchasers petitioning for redetermination (identities redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1994. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1994
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This June 2, 1994 California State Board of Equalization revised Decision and Recommendation concerns a specific $17,000 mobilehome purchase and is not a supplied final Board order. Documents it refers to, such as the request or supporting records, are not published with it. Another purchaser should not treat the recommendation as binding; current mobilehome, registration, value-guide, penalty, credit, sales-tax, and use-tax law controls. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Purchasers paid $17,000 for a used mobilehome. Its Kelly Blue Book value was $5,630, with the difference described as location value. They initially registered through DMV and paid tax on a $4,000 measure, but did not register with the Department of Housing and Community Development until after the original recommendation.

California's special used-mobilehome rule measured tax by recognized guide value rather than the full price. The definition covered a mobilehome that was “previously sold and registered or titled” with DHCD or an appropriate out-of-state agency.

The revised recommendation concluded that “previously” modified “sold,” not “registered or titled.” A current owner's tax treatment should not depend on the prior owner's failure to register, and the regulation's penalty provisions encouraged current owners to complete registration.

Because the purchasers had now registered with DHCD, the proper measure was the $5,630 guide value. After credit for tax reported to DMV on $4,000, the remaining deficiency measure was $1,630 rather than $13,000.

Source and live-annotation limits

The revised recommendation incorporates the original March 9, 1994 recommendation and says the purchasers filed a timely reconsideration request, but neither record is reproduced. It does not identify the parties or supply the mobilehome, purchase agreement, $17,000 payment, location-value evidence, Kelly Blue Book page, DMV and DHCD applications, $4,000 tax report or payment, notice of determination, penalty calculation, hearing record, final Board action, payment, appeal, or later outcome. The source also prints “mobliehomes” and subdivision “{c}”; those defects remain in the original text.

The live annotation preserves only the prior DMV registration, lack of prior DHCD registration, interpretation of “previously,” and current owner's ability to register. It omits the revised-recommendation and reconsideration posture, all dollar amounts, location value, current registration after the first recommendation, statutory and penalty analysis, tax credit, deficiency reduction, missing records, source defects, and final-outcome gap.

What this means for you

Mobilehome purchasers and tax professionals

Confirm whether the unit was previously sold, whether current DHCD registration is required and completed, the recognized guide value, and any tax already paid. Late registration may trigger penalties even when the special value measure applies.

Common questions

Q: Did the prior owner's failure to register defeat used-mobilehome treatment?

A: No.

Q: What did “previously” modify?

A: “Sold,” not “registered or titled.”

Q: What tax measure applied after current registration?

A: The $5,630 guide value, with credit for the $4,000 measure already reported to DMV.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code §§ 6012.2, 6455, and 6591
  • California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6451 — cited as the beginning of Chapter 5
  • California Health and Safety Code § 18014
  • California Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1610.2(a)(3) and (c)
  • Original March 9, 1994 Decision and Recommendation and timely Request for Reconsideration — incorporated, described, or referenced but not included

Verbatim support

From the official June 2, 1994 revised recommendation:

We see no reason why the current owner's tax liabilities should depend on the actions (or inaction) of a prior owner.

Redetermine, reducing the measure of tax from $13,000 to $1,630.

Source

Original ruling text

362.0080

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
LEGAL DIVISION, APPEALS REVIEW SECTION

In the Matter of the petition for
Redetermination Under the Sales
and Use Tax Law of:

Petitioners

)
)
)
)
)
)

REVISED
DECISION AND RECOMMENDATION
No.1

In the original Decision and Recommendation issued March 9, 1994, we recommended no adjustment to the tax. Petitioners filed a timely Request for Reconsideration. Summary The facts are set out in the original Decision and Recommendation, incorporated herein by this reference. Briefly summarized, petitioners purchased a used mobilehome for $17,000. The market value of the mobilehome listed in the Kelly Blue Book was $5,630, and the difference was paid for "location value". Petitioners registered the unit with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paid tax to DMV on a measure of $4,000. They did not register the unit with the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) at that time. In response to our recommendation in this matter, however, petitioners have now registered the mobilehome with DHCD. Analysis and Conclusions Revenue and Taxation Code section 6012.2 adopts a special definition or "sales price" for "used mobilehomes" as defined in Health and Safety Code section 18014. With certain exceptions not relevant here, the taxable sales price of such mobilehomes is the "current value" as specified in a recognized value guide. In this case, the measure of tax under the special

provisions would be $5,630, the Kelly Blue Book value of the unit, rather than the $17,000 actual purchase price. Health and Safety Code section 18014 defines "used mobilehome" as a mobilehome "that was previously sold and registered or titled with" DHCD or an appropriate agency from another jurisdiction. This definition is incorporated into subdivision (a) (3) of Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1610.2. It has been suggested that the word "previously" in this definition modifies not only the word "sold ", but also the words "registered or titled". If this interpretation is correct, the special rules for used mobliehomes would not apply unless the unit was appropriately registered by the prior owner, even if the current owner registered it properly. We do not agree with this interpretation. We see no reason why the current owner's tax liabilities should depend on the actions (or inaction) of a prior owner. Other provisions of Regulation 1610.2 indicate that the special rules for "used mobilehomes" apply to any previously owned mobilehome which is required to be registered with DHCD, even if the prior owner did not register it. For example, the first paragraph of subdivision {c} provides that purchasers of mobilehomes which are "required to be registered annually" shall pay the tax upon registration with DHCD. The last three paragraphs then provide: "Whenever the purchaser of a mobilehome is required to pay use tax to the Department of Housing and Community Development, the measure of tax shall be determined in accordance with [the rules for new or used mobilehomes], whichever is applicable." "If the purchaser of a mobilehome or commercial coach makes an application to the Department of Housing and Community Development which is not timely, and is subject to penalty because of delinquency in effecting registration or transfer of registration of the property, the purchaser then becomes liable also for penalty specified in Section 6591 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, but no interest shall accrue." "If the purchaser of a mobilehome or commercial coach does not make application to the Department of Housing and Community Development, or does not pay the amount of use tax due, or files a return with the Board under Section 6455 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which is not timely, interest and penalties shall apply with respect to the unpaid amount as provided in Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 6451) of Part I, Division 2, of the Revenue and Taxation Code." The obvious purpose of these provisions is to encourage current owners to register their units with DHCD. That purpose would be frustrated if the special rules for used mobilehomes were unavailable to a current owner whose unit had not previously been registered properly. For these reasons, we conclude that the word "previously" in Regulation 1610.2, subdivision (a) (3), modifies the word "sold" but not the words "registered or titled". The special rules for used mobilehomes therefore apply to any mobilehome which was previously sold, and which is properly registered or titled by the current owner. Since petitioners have now registered

their unit with DHCD, the proper measure of tax is $5,630. Allowing credit for the tax petitioners reported to DMV, the deficiency is measured by $1,630.

Recommendation
Redetermine, reducing the measure of tax from $13,000 to $1,630.

James E. Mahler, Senior Staff Counsel

6/2/94
Date

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1994. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace