After confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan, could California resume a pending tax petition and refund claim, and had the nonfinal liability been discharged?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California legal staff said confirmation of the taxpayer's Chapter 11 plan lifted the automatic stay, so the Board could resume the pending redetermination petition and protective refund claim.
The taxpayer had petitioned a jeopardy determination and posted security before filing Chapter 11. The later plan and confirmation order contained no provision changing the statutory lifting of the stay. Staff therefore treated the stay as ending when the confirmation order was entered.
The determined liability had not yet become due, payable, or final under California law. Staff concluded that it had not been discharged and could now be resolved with the refund claim.
Common questions
When did staff say the stay ended?
When the Chapter 11 confirmation order was entered.
Had the petitioned liability been discharged?
No.
Did the memorandum decide the tax amount or refund?
No. It said those matters could resume.
Citations and references
- 11 U.S.C. section 362(c) — duration of the automatic stay
- 11 U.S.C. section 1141(b), (d)(1) — property vesting and Chapter 11 discharge upon confirmation
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/170-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/170-0007-003.pdf
Original ruling text
State of California
Board of Equalization
Legal Division-MIC: 82
Memorandum
To :
Mr. Vic Anderson
Supervisor, Petitions Section
From :
Thomas J. Cooke
Tax Counsel
Subject:
P--- L--- Co. Inc.
Account No. SR BH XX-XXXXXX-010
170.0007.003
Date:
August 28, 1996
Telephone:
(916) 445-6496
CalNet 485-6496
Gary Jugum has requested that I respond to your memorandum to him dated August 20, 1996 concerning the above taxpayer. In your memorandum, you state that a Jeopardy Notice of Determination was issued to the taxpayer for the period 07-01-90 to 09-30-93 on December 7, 1993. Shortly thereafter, the taxpayer filed a timely petition for redetermination and posted security equal to the determined liability. A protective claim for refund was later filed by the taxpayer’s representative in the amount of the security posted. On January 10, 1994, the taxpayer filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The taxpayer’s Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by order of the bankruptcy court on December 28, 1995. You ask that the Legal Section provide guidance on the action to be taken on the taxpayer’s petition and protective claim for refund. 11 U.S.C. section 362(c) provides that a bankruptcy “stay” continues until property of the bankruptcy estate is no longer property of the estate or until a bankruptcy discharge is granted or denied. 11 U.S.C. section 1141(b) provides that except as otherwise provided in the plan or the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan vests all of the property of the estate in the debtor. 11 U.S.C. section 1141(d)(1) provides that except as otherwise provided in the subsection, in the plan, or in the order confirming the plan, the confirmation of a plan discharges the debtor from any debt that arose before the date of such confirmation.
Mr. Vic Anderson
-2-
August 28, 1996
170.0007.003
We have not discovered any provision in the taxpayer’s plan or in the order confirming the plan which modifies the date that the “automatic stay” is lifted by statute. It is our opinion that the taxpayer’s “automatic stay” was lifted when the order confirming the taxpayer’s plan was entered and that the Board may now resolve the taxpayer’s determined liability and claim for refund. The taxpayer’s determined liability has not become “due and payable” or “final” under California law and therefore has not been discharged in the taxpayer’s bankruptcy action. TJC/cmm cc:
Audit Program Manager (MIC:49)
Robert Buntjer, Refunds and Allocation Section (MIC:39)
San Francisco District Administrator (BH)
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace