How did California tax cosmetic samples used in-state, shipped out for use, or withdrawn from resale inventory?

Short answer Specific sample purchases were retail unless an interstate-sale rule applied. Proper resale-inventory withdrawals were taxed by cost when used in California, but not when merely stored here and used outside; an improper resale certificate could shift tax responsibility to the buyer on the full price.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 280.0960
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1953-12-22
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
A wholesale cosmetic distributor (identity redacted)

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1953. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1953
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This Dec. 22, 1953 junior-counsel letter addresses distinct sample acquisition, storage, shipment, withdrawal, gift, and demonstration patterns. The PDF does not reproduce the inquiry, products, orders, invoices, resale certificates, warehouse or withdrawal records, studio transfers, bills of lading, recipients, demonstrations, costs, returns, tax payments, or enclosed Rulings 55 and 72. Two passages are bracketed without author, date, or editorial explanation; that provenance limit is preserved. CDTFA's current annotation omits temporary-storage, direct-gift, and section 6094.5 responsibility details. Another taxpayer should check current sample, acquisition intent, certificate, temporary storage, gift completion, shipment, in-state and out-of-state use, responsibility, records, and sales-and-use-tax law. Another taxpayer should not treat it as binding. This summary is informational only and is not legal or tax advice.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A wholesale cosmetic distributor bought specifically identified samples along with regular merchandise and sent many to out-of-state studios for giveaways or demonstrations. The source treated the distributor as consumer of specific samples. A California retail sale remained taxable unless the seller was required to ship the property outside California under historical Ruling 55.

Mere temporary California storage before actual use outside the state did not create use tax. When the distributor properly bought undifferentiated regular inventory for resale and later withdrew samples, use tax applied by cost to items used in California but not to items merely stored here and used outside. The bracketed source text separately says direct common-carrier shipment of giveaways from California was treated as California use.

Property known at purchase to be for sample use could not properly be bought with a resale certificate, although a qualifying out-of-state purchase could avoid sales tax and be tested under use-tax rules. If sales tax applied but the buyer nevertheless issued a resale certificate, the source said section 6094.5 shifted primary payment responsibility to the buyer on the total sale price, regardless of where some property would be used.

Citations and references

  • California Revenue and Taxation Code § 6094.5
  • Historical California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 55, paragraphs A-1-(a) and B — cited and characterized; copy identified as enclosed but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Historical California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 72 — cited and characterized; copy identified as enclosed but not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Specific sample purchases, regular cosmetic inventory, California use, out-of-state studios, giveaways, demonstration, temporary storage, direct common-carrier gifts, withdrawals, acquisition intent, resale certificates, seller shipment duties, total sale price, and tax responsibility — facts and rules supplied; inquiry, products, sample and inventory orders, invoices, certificates, warehouse and withdrawal records, studio transfers, bills of lading, recipient and demonstration records, costs, returns, and tax payments not reproduced in the official PDF
  • Bracketed PDF language concerning outside-California purchaser use and California common-carrier gifts — text supplied without author, date, or editorial explanation
  • Official Annotation 280.0960's specific-sample purchase, consumer, interstate shipment, inventory withdrawal, California use, and improper-certificate summary — annotation omits temporary-storage, direct-gift, section 6094.5 responsibility, and bracketed provenance and supplies no additional transaction record
  • Possible later sample purchase, withdrawal, transfer, return filing, audit, assessment, payment, refund claim, appeal, or other agency action — not supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

280.0960

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION

December 22, 1953

--- --- ----- --- ----- --- --Gentlemen:
You are a wholesale distributing company and purchase, along with your regular cosmetic items, samples of these same products. Some of the samples are used in California, but most are sent to your studios out of state for the purpose of being given away or used in demonstrating the products. The California sales tax applies to retail sales of tangible personal property in this State and is legally imposed upon the retailer. As indicated in Sales and Use Tax Ruling 72 (copy enclosed), you are the consumer of the samples and the sale of the samples to you is at retail. If a retail sale is made in this State, the fact that the purchaser will use the property outside the State does not exempt the transaction from the sales tax unless the retailer is required to ship the property outside this State (Ruling 55, copy enclosed). In addition to the sales tax, California has a use tax which is legally imposed on the purchaser and applies to the use in this State of property which has been purchased for use in this State. The use tax does not apply to any transaction which is subject to the sales tax. As indicated in Paragraph B of Ruling 55, the use tax would not apply to the mere temporary storage in California of sample merchandise which is eventually used outside California. If sample merchandise is obtained by merely withdrawing a sufficient quantity from your inventory of regular merchandise, it is proper for you to purchase all such merchandise ex tax for resale. That is, at the time of purchase you know that some of the merchandise will be used rather than resold but you do not know which specific items will be used and which will be resold.

--- --- ---

-2-

December 22, 1953
280.0960

If a person properly purchases property ex tax for resale and uses the property, he is liable for a use tax measured by the cost of the property used. The use tax will not apply to such of your samples as are properly purchased for resale and used [by the purchaser] outside California but will apply to samples properly purchased for resale and used in California. [If you give samples away by shipping them by common carrier from California directly to the recipients, you would be regarded as using them in California and use tax would apply to that use]. If particular merchandise is purchased specifically for sample use, it is improper to give a resale certificate because you know at the time of purchase that it will be used and not resold. Such purchase, however, might still be exempt from the sales tax if purchased from an out-of-state seller under the conditions outlined in Paragraph A-1-(a) of Ruling 55. If it is exempt from the sales tax, the use tax is the applicable tax and applies to samples used in California but does not apply to samples merely stored in California but used outside California. If property is purchased under such circumstances that the sales tax applies but you nevertheless give a resale certificate, the transaction is not thereby shifted from a sales tax situation to a use tax situation. Your supplier may still be liable for the tax, but by giving a resale certificate improperly, you shift the primary responsibility for the payment of the tax to yourself. You are then under a duty to report and pay the tax measured by the total sale price and it is immaterial that some of the property purchased will not be used in California. See also Section 6094.5 Very truly yours,

Bill Holden
Junior Counsel

BH:ja

cc:

Inglewood - Auditing

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1953. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace