Was a seller of certificates redeemable for personalized cards and calendars the retailer of the finished products?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1996. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A California business sold certificates that customers redeemed by sending their photograph, text, and a separate postage-and-handling payment to a Texas supplier. The supplier produced personalized calendars, trading cards, business cards, or postcards and shipped them to the customers.
California staff treated the certificate seller as the retailer of the finished personalized products, not merely as a seller of paper certificates. The Texas supplier delivered the products on the seller's behalf.
The opinion assumed title passed outside California when the Texas supplier completed its physical-delivery responsibility. California customers therefore owed use tax rather than sales tax, and the certificate seller had to collect and remit it as the retailer. The written letter superseded an initial oral opinion from June 1996.
Common questions
What property was the business treated as selling?
The finished personalized printed products.
Who fulfilled the orders?
The Texas supplier, on the certificate seller's behalf.
Why did the opinion apply use tax rather than sales tax?
It assumed title passed outside California during shipment.
Did this letter replace an earlier answer?
Yes. It superseded the initial telephone opinion.
Citations and references
- California Revenue and Taxation Code section 6203 — retailer's use-tax collection duty applied
- California Revenue and Taxation Code sections 6012(a), 6051, 6201, and 6401 — taxable measure and sales/use tax framework discussed
- California Commercial Code section 2401 — passage of title used to locate the sale
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/175-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/175-0148-750.pdf
Original ruling text
175.0148.750
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
LEGAL DIVISION (MIC:82)
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
Telephone: (916) 324-2637
FAX: (916) 323-3387
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
July 2, 1996
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
E. L. Sorensen, Jr.
Executive Director
REDACTED TEXT
Re:
Sales of “Personal Pictures”
Dear REDACTED TEXT:
This is in response to your letter dated June 6, 1996 regarding the application of tax on “personal picture” certificates which are redeemable for printed materials that contain a picture and text provided by your customers. You state: “I buy these certificates at a cost and then turn around and sell them to who[m]ever wants to buy them.... When the certificate is redeemed by the person who purchases ... [it], the customer, now owner of the certificate, takes it home, selects their picture, writes their own words, ... enclos[es] a check for $5.95 for postage and handling, [and] sends [these items] ... to Texas[.] In 2-4 weeks, [the customer receives] ... their product [consisting of either] a set of trading cards, their business card with a picture on it, [a] calendar with a picture or a set of postcards.” You ask whether tax applies to your company’s operations. For purposes of this opinion, we assume that the Texas company manufactures the certificates and transfers title to these certificates to you outside the state. (We will not therefore discuss whether California tax applies to the Texas company’s sales or use of these certificates.) Discussion California imposes a sales tax on a retailer's gross receipts from the retail sale of tangible personal property inside this state unless the sale is specifically exempted from taxation by statute. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6051). Taxable gross receipts include all amounts received with respect to the sale, with no deduction for the cost of materials, service, or other expense of the retailer passed on to the purchaser unless there is a specific statutory exclusion. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6012(a)). When sales tax does not apply, use tax is imposed on the sales price of
REDACTED TEXT
-2-
July 2, 1996
175.0148.750
tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for the storage, use, or consumption of that property in California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401). A retailer engaged in business inside this state is required to collect the applicable use tax from the purchaser at the time of sale of property to be used inside this state. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203.) We understand that you collect a predetermined amount from your customers for “personalized” picture items and provide them with a certificate which they mail (along with a picture and text) to your supplier in Texas. Your supplier then ships a finished “personal picture” to your customer inside this state on your behalf. Under these facts, we regard you as the retailer of the personalized calendars, trading cards and post cards purchased by your customers. We assume that title to these items passes from the Texas company to you (and then from you to your customer) outside this state when the Texas company completes its responsibilities with respect to physical delivery of the property. (See Cal. U. Com. Code § 2401.) Since title to this property passes outside this state, your customers owe use tax measured by the purchase price of the property since they purchased the property for storage or use inside California. (Rev. & Tax. Code §§ 6201, 6401.) You are responsible to collect this tax from your customers and remit it to this Board since you are the retailer of these goods. (Rev. & Tax. Code § 6203.) This letter supersedes and replaces our initial opinion regarding the application of tax on your operations as expressed to you during our telephone conversation in June, 1996. If you have any additional questions or information which may change our opinion, please write again. Sincerely,
Warren L. Astleford
Tax Counsel
WLA:rz
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1996. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace