Could a lessor buy packing materials for resale when it unpacked and assembled leased equipment at the lessee's premises?

Short answer Yes. When the lease was a continuing sale taxed on rental receipts, California treated the packing material as sold with the leased property.
State
CA
Ruling
Annotation 195.2029
Tax type
Sales and Use Tax
Issued
1982-02-10
Issued by
California State Board of Equalization
Requested by
Board district and subdistrict principal auditors

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1982. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.

Currency note: this ruling is from 1982
Subsequent statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later rulings may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, rate, or position mentioned here.
Disclaimer: The official PDF combines Gary Jugum's undated Non-Attorney Opinions review with D. F. Brady's underlying February 10, 1982 audit memorandum, which supplies the date used here. The audit memorandum describes a recent petition without identifying the taxpayer, date, or matter and reports a Board finding without supplying the petition or separate Board decision. The listed copies to four named staff members and Headquarters Audit Unit Supervisors have no separate transmittal records. The policy concerns leases treated as continuing sales with tax reported on rental receipts and the same lessor delivering, unpacking, and assembling the equipment. Lease tax method, packing flow, seller role, later authority, and current law control.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official state tax ruling. The original ruling (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original ruling (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A lessor packaged equipment, delivered it to the lessee, then unpacked and assembled it at the lessee's premises. The lease was treated as a continuing sale, with tax reported on rental receipts.

California concluded that the packing material was sold to the lessee with the leased equipment even though the lessor removed the packaging and performed assembly onsite.

The lessor could buy the packing material under a resale certificate. The audit memorandum directed that the policy be applied retroactively when the same circumstances existed.

Common questions

Did onsite unpacking make the lessor the packaging consumer?

No, under the stated continuing-sale lease facts.

Did the tax method matter?

Yes. The memorandum expressly addressed tax reported on the rental-receipts basis.

Citations and references

  • Recent petition concerning packing materials used for equipment leased as a continuing sale — date, taxpayer, identifier, and petition copy not provided in the official PDF
  • D. F. Brady's February 10, 1982 memorandum to District and Subdistrict Principal Auditors — continuing-sale lease packing policy and retroactive direction
  • Gary Jugum's undated Non-Attorney Opinions memorandum to Glenn Bystrom — concurrence with Brady's memorandum
  • Copies to J. D. Dotson, R. Nunes, G. Jugum, R. Lively, and Headquarters Audit Unit Supervisors — copy recipients listed; no separate transmittal records supplied in the official PDF

Source

Original ruling text

195.2029

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
To

:

Mr. Glenn Bystrom

From

:

Gary Jugum

Subject

:

Non-Attorney Opinions

I have reviewed D F. Brady's memorandum of February 10, 1982 to District and Subdistrict Principal Auditors. We are in agreement with his conclusion, as follows:

Packing Material -Leased Equipment. Leased equipment which is packaged by the lessor is delivered to the lessee's premises and unpacked and assembled by the lessor. The packing material is "sold" with leased property when tax on the lease is reported on the rental receipts basis. The lessor may properly issue a resale certificate. 2/10/82

State of California

Board of Equalization

Memorandum

To:

District and Subdistrict Principal Auditors

From:

Headquarters – Principal Tax Auditor

Subject:

Containers Used to Ship Rental Equipment

195.2029

Date:

February 10, 1982

A recent petition raised the question of whether packaging material used to package property that is leased, under conditions making the lease a continuing sale, may be purchased for resale or whether it is consumed by the lessor. In this case, the equipment was unpacked by the lessor on the lessees premises and set up (assembled) by the lessor. It was originally held that, since the lease did not commence until the equipment was unpacked and set up, the packing material did not qualify as non-returnable containers sold with the product. The Board found that such packing material is sold to the lessee with the leased property and that the lessor may properly purchase the packing materials under a resale certificate. This policy should be applied retroactively when the same circumstances are encountered. DFB:j cc:

Mr. J. D. Dotson
Mr. R. Nunes
Mr. G. Jugum.
Mr. R. Lively
Headquarters Audit Unit Supervisors

What does the law say today, for your facts?

This ruling is from 1982. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace