Were preloaded, nonreusable Visistat skin staplers exempt from California sales and use tax?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1995. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
California had previously concluded that the Visistat skin staplers did not qualify for the medicine treatment because the information then available suggested they were refillable and reusable.
The company then confirmed that the staplers were sold prefilled and could not be reused. On those corrected facts, counsel said the staplers were containers sold with contents whose sale was exempt as medicine, so sales of the preloaded staplers were exempt.
Common questions
Why did California change its answer?
The company's follow-up corrected the factual assumption about refillability and reuse.
Did the letter exempt every skin-stapling product?
No. The conclusion rests on this product being sold preloaded and nonreusable.
Citations and references
- Regulation 1591 — medicine treatment discussed in the letter
- Regulation 1589(b)(1)(C) — exemption for the qualifying preloaded container stated by counsel
- Requester's August 21, 1995 letter — preloaded and nonreusable product facts confirmed; separate letter not reproduced in the official PDF
- Senior Staff Counsel John L. Waid's July 27, 1995 letter — earlier refillable-and-reusable factual assumption and adverse conclusion summarized; separate letter not reproduced in the official PDF
- Prior Board determination — qualifying staplers treated as containers sold with exempt medicine; date, author, identifier, and separate source not supplied in the official PDF
- Regulation 1589 — copy listed as enclosed but not included in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/195-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/195-1208.pdf
Original ruling text
195.1208
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
JOHAN KLEHS
First District, Hayward
LEGAL DIVISION - MIC 82
450 N STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
(P.O. BOX 942879, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 94279-0082)
DEAN ANDAL
Second District, Stockton
Telephone No.: (916) 324-3828
Fax No: (916) 323-3387
ERNEST J. DRONENBURG, JR.
Third District, San Diego
BRAD SHERMAN
Fourth District, Los Angeles
September 26, 1995
KATHLEEN CONNELL
Controller, Sacramento
────────
Mr. M--- W. P--General Ledger Supervisor
P--One --- Drive
P.O. Box XXXXX
R--- T--- Park, NC XXXXX
BURTON W. OLIVER
Executive Director
RE:
SC OH XX-XXXXXX
Skin Staplers
Dear Mr. P---:
I am answering your letter to me dated August 21, 1995, following up on mine to you of July 27, 1995, wherein I determined that the Visistat Skin Staplers did not qualify as medicines under Sales and Use Tax Regulation 1591, based on my conclusion, from the information you supplied, that the staplers were refillable and reusable. You now confirm that they are sold pre-filled and are not reusable. We have previously determined that such staplers constitute containers sold with contents the sale of which are exempt from tax under Regulation 1591. As a result, sales of such pre-loaded staplers are exempt from tax under Regulation 1589(b)(1)(C). For your information, I have included a copy of Regulation 1589. I hope the above discussion has answered your question. If you need anything further, please do not hesitate to write again. Sincerely,
John L. Waid
Senior Staff Counsel
JLW:sr
Enclosure:
cc:
Reg. 1589
Out-of-State District Administrator - OH
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1995. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace