Were movable telescoping airport jetways materials or transportation equipment?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1961. Ask about yours and see what current California tax law says, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Airport Jetways were materials because they operated as extensions of the terminal structure and served as stationary hallways for passengers moving between the building and aircraft.
Their telescoping action and movement did not change the result. Each unit remained permanently attached to the building at one end and functioned more like an adjustable ramp than an elevator or conveyor that transports people through its own movement.
The installing contractor consumed the steel and other materials incorporated into the finished Jetways. Materials known at purchase to be used in the installation should not be bought under a resale certificate.
Common questions
Did movement and telescoping make the Jetway equipment?
No.
Why was it treated as material?
It was a permanently attached extension of the terminal functioning as a passenger corridor.
Could known installation materials be purchased for resale?
No. The letter said resale certificates were improper when use rather than resale was known at purchase.
Citations and references
- Former California Sales and Use Tax Ruling 11 — Jetways as structural materials and installer as consumer of incorporated steel and other materials applied; a copy was identified as enclosed but is not reproduced in the official PDF
- Unspecified provisions of the California Sales and Use Tax Law — resale-certificate purchases authorized only when the purchaser intends resale or cannot determine at purchase whether property will be resold or otherwise used, as paraphrased; the official PDF gives no section number
- May 11, 1961 requester letter and enclosure — Jetway status, permanent building attachment, movement, function, and stock-resale purchasing reviewed and applied; not reproduced in the official PDF
Source
- Annotated Legal Opinions collection: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/taxes-and-fees/annotations-menu.htm
- Annotation page: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/vol2/suta/190-0000-all.html
- Original supporting opinion: https://cdtfa.ca.gov/lawguides/annotations/190-1840.pdf
Original ruling text
190.1840
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
June 7, 1961
P. I. S--- Corporation
XXXXX South --- Street
--- --- X, California
Attention:
Mr. V. A. R--Office Manager
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed your letter of May 11 and the enclosure in connection with the proper status for sales and use tax purposes of Jetway units. As these units are in effect and in operation a part of, or at least extensions of, a structure and constitute corridors for passenger use similar to any other hallway or corridor in a building, we believe the Jetways may be regarded as a part of the structure and thus constituting “materials” within the meaning of Ruling 11, copy enclosed. Notwithstanding the fact that the Jetways are movable and have a telescopic action, they are nevertheless, as we understand it, permanently attached at one end to the building. They are somewhat analogous to ramps, raised and lowered from docks to the decks of a vessel. They differ from elevators and conveyors in that their function is not to transport passengers by actual movement, as in the case of an elevator, but simply to provide a stationary hallway for the use of passengers traveling between the main airport structure and the planes. Accordingly, we believe that the installing contractor is the consumer of the materials which it uses in making these installations, and tax applies with respect to the sale to the installing contractor of the steel and other materials which are incorporated into the finished Jetways. With reference to your statement that all materials for these items are bought for “stock resale”, we suggest that if it is known at the time of purchase that these materials are to be used rather than resold, they should not be purchased under a resale certificate. To so purchase them would be contrary to the provisions of the Sales and Use Tax Law, which authorizes purchases under a resale certificate only when the purchaser at the time of purchase intends to sell the property
Mr. ---
-2-
May 25, 1970
585.0280
or is unable to ascertain at the time of purchase whether it will be resold or used for some other purpose. Very truly yours,
E. H. Stetson
Tax Counsel
EHS:tl
Enc.
cc:
Los Angeles - Administrator
What does the law say today, for your facts?
This ruling is from 1961. Ezel checks current California tax law against your situation and cites the authority it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace